Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 113, Issue 1–2, pp 337–349 | Cite as

Contemporary surface wind climatology of Turkey

Original Paper


The aim of this study was to examine the climatological characteristics of boundary layer gradient winds in Turkey in detail. In the study, monthly average wind speed (Vm) data measured at 267 stations for the 16 directions, prevailing wind direction (Vp), and station pressure (Ps) data measured at 174 stations during the period 1970–2008 by the Turkish Meteorological Service (TMS) were used. The data were provided by the TMS. To attain the aim of the study, wind patterns of midseason months representing the seasonal wind distributions were used, and surface wind formations were examined through calculation of divergent and rotational components of the average wind rate. Besides, it was aimed at explaining the relationships between sea level pressure (SLP) patterns and wind formations. The patterns of midseason months were examined via the Principal Component Analysis (PCA). In accordance with Vm data, it is seen that air flows in Turkey generally tend to orientate radially from west to east. Climatologically, the strongest prevailing winds in Turkey blow during the summer months, while the weakest winds blow during the autumn months. Vm and Vp distributions show a parallelism (i.e., wind gradient) in the months during which temperature differences between land and sea are high due to the differences in their specific heat values. The distributions of Vm and Vp values vary considerably in spring and autumn months during which temperature differences are relatively lower. According to the PCA results, the first two components represent the strong wind areas in Turkey. These components presumably explain the existence of coherent wind formation areas, which display different characteristics due to regional physical geographical factors and processes (e.g., orography, altitude, exposure, land–sea distribution, surface mechanical and thermodynamic modifications of the air masses and air flows, etc.) in addition to the direct effect of different synoptic-scale pressure and circulation conditions.


  1. Adams JC, Swarztrauber PN (1999) SPHEREPACK 3.0: a model development facility. Mon Weather Rev 127:1872–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atalay İ, Mortan K (2008) Regional geography of Turkey. İnkilap Kitabevi, İstanbul, (in Turkish). ISBN: 9751026446Google Scholar
  3. Berg MD, Cheong O, Kreveld MV, Overmars M (2008) Computational geometry: algorithms and applications, 3rd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Conrad V (1946) Methods in climatology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Second printingGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis B (1996) GIS: a visual approach. On Word Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  6. EİEİ (2009) Türkiye Rüzgar Enerjisi Potansiyel Atlası (REPA). Elektrik İşleri Etüt İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü (EİEİ), AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  7. Erinç S (1984) Climatology and its methods, 3rd edn. Gür-ay Pres Inc, İstanbul, in TurkishGoogle Scholar
  8. Erlat E, Türkeş M (2012) Analysis of observed variability and trends in numbers of frost days in Turkey for the period 1950–2010. Int J Climatol 32:1889–1898. doi:10.1002/joc.2403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster MP, Evans AN (2008) An evaluation of interpolation techniques for reconstructing ionospheric TEC maps. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 46:2153–2164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gold CM (1989) Surface interpolation, spatial adjacency, and GIS. In: Raper J (ed) Three dimensional applications in geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, Ltd., London, pp 21–35.Google Scholar
  11. Haan CT (1977) Statistical methods in hydrology. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones MD, Roberts CN, Leng MJ, Türkeş M (2006) A high-resolution late Holocene lake isotope record from Turkey and links to North Atlantic and monsoon climate. Geology 34:361–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kavasseri GR, Nagarajan R (2005) A multifractal description of wind speed records. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 24:165–173Google Scholar
  14. Koçak K (2008) Practical ways of evaluating wind speed persistence. Energy 33:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koçak K (2009) Examination of persistence properties of wind speed records using detrended fluctuation analysis. Energy 34:1980–1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kutiel H, Türkeş M (2005) New evidence about the role of the North Sea–Caspian Pattern (NCP) on the temperature and precipitation regimes in continental central Turkey. Geogr Ann A Phys Geogr 87:501–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kutiel H, Hirsch-Eshkol TR, Türkeş M (2001) Sea level pressure patterns associated with dry or wet monthly rainfall conditions in Turkey. Theor Appl Climatol 69:39–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lavagnini A, Sempreviva AM, Transerici C et al (2006) Offshore wind climatology over the Mediterranean basin. Wind Energy 9:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rehman S, Halawani TO (1994) Statistical characteristics of wind in Saudi Arabia. Renew Energy 4:949–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rehman S, Ahmad A, El-Amin I, Al-Hadhrami LM (2009) Assessment of wind power, wind exponent, local air density and air turbulence intensity for an isolated site. Int J Sustain Energy 28:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sambridge M, Braun J, McQueen H (1995) Geophysical parameterization and interpolation of irregular data using natural neighbors. Geophys J Int 122:837–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sibson R (1981) A brief description of natural neighbor interpolation. Chapter 2 in Interpolating multivariate data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Tatli H, Dalfes HN, Menteş ŞS (2005) Surface air temperature variability over Turkey and its connection to large scale upper air circulation via multivariate techniques. Int J Climatol 25:331–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Telesca L, Lovallo M (2011) Analysis of time dynamics in wind records by means of multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis and Fisher–Shannon information plane. J Stat Mech-Theory E p. P07001Google Scholar
  25. Türkeş M (1998) Influence of geopotential heights, cyclone frequency and southern oscillation on rainfall variations in Turkey. Int J Climatol 18:649–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Türkeş M (2010) Climatology and meteorology. First Edition, Kriter—Publication No. 63, Physical Geography Series No. 1, ISBN: 978-605-5863-39-6, 650 + XXII pp., (in Turkish), İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  27. Türkeş M, Erlat E (2003) Precipitation changes and variability in Turkey linked to the North Atlantic Oscillation during the period 1930–2000. Int J Climatol 23:1771–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Türkeş M, Erlat E (2006) Influences of the North Atlantic oscillation on precipitation variability and changes in Turkey. Nuovo Cimento Della Societa Italiana Di Fisica C-Geophysics and Space Physics 29:117–135Google Scholar
  29. Türkeş M, Sümer UM (2004) Spatial and temporal patterns of trends and variability in diurnal temperature ranges of Turkey. Theor Appl Climatol 77:195–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Türkeş M, Koç T, Sarış F (2009) Spatiotemporal variability of precipitation total series over Turkey. Int J Climatol 29:1056–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watson DF (1992) Contouring: a guide to the analysis and display of spatial data. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Watson DF, Phillip G (1987) Neighborhood-based interpolation. Geobyte 2:12–16Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering Department, Engineering FacultyNamik Kemal UniversityÇorluTurkey
  2. 2.Physical Geography Division, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences and ArtsÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityÇanakkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations