Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 104, Issue 1–2, pp 193–207 | Cite as

Impacts of irrigation on dry season precipitation in India

  • Shouraseni Sen Roy
  • Rezaul Mahmood
  • Arturo I. Quintanar
  • Astrid Gonzalez
Original Paper


There is a lack of observed data-based studies examining the role of enhanced soil moisture conditions (due to irrigation) on the prevailing precipitation. Therefore, in the present study, we have examined the impacts of the Green Revolution (GR) related expansion of irrigation and changes in dry season (the rabi (November to May) and the zaid (March to June)) precipitation in India. The results for some regions indicated decreasing and increasing trend in precipitation during the pre- and post-GR periods, respectively. For example, in eastern Madhya Pradesh, the pre- and post-GR precipitation trends for the zaid season were −0.45 and 2.40 mm year−1, respectively. On the other hand, some regions reported lower rate of decline in precipitation during the post-GR period. This paper suggests that both positive and lower declining trend during the post-GR period were linked to increased precipitation due to the introduction of irrigation. The study has found up to 69 mm (121%) increase in total amount of precipitation for growing seasons during the post-GR period. Moreover, a 175% increase in average precipitation was also recorded. All irrigated regions show a notable increase in precipitation during post-GR growing seasons. It was found that differences in growing season average precipitation between the pre- and post-GR periods were statistically significant for most of the regions. For further verification of results, the MM5 and Noah land surface model were applied. These applications show changes in precipitation and various precipitation controlling factors due to changes in soil moisture.


  1. Adegoke JO, Pielke RA, Carleton AM (2007) Observational and modeling studies of the impact of agriculture-related land use change on climate in the central U.S. Agric For Meteorol 142:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aligo EA, Gallus WA, Segal M (2007) Summer rainfall forecast spread in an ensemble initialized with different soil moisture analyses. Weather Forecast 22:299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonge CJ, Mohr KI, Tao W-K (2007) Numerical studies of wet versus dry soil regimes in the West African Sahel. J Hydrometeorol 8:102–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anthes RA (1984) Enhancement of convective precipitation by mesoscale variations in vegetative covering in semiarid regions. J Appl Meteorol 23:541–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlage M, Zeng X (2004) The effects of observed fractional vegetation cover on the land surface climatology of the community land model. J Hydrometeorol 10:823–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnston AG, Schickendanz PT (1984) The effects of irrigation on warm season precipitation in the southern Great Plains. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:865–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basara JB, Crawford KC (2002) Linear relationships between root-zone soil moisture and atmospheric processes in the planetary boundary layer. J Geophys Res 107(D15):4274. doi:10.1029/2001JD000633 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betts AK, Ball JH (1995) The FIFE surface diurnal cycle climate. J Geophys Res 100(25):679–25693Google Scholar
  9. Betts AK, Ball JH, Beljaars ACM, Miller MJ, Viterbo PA (1996) The land surface–atmosphere interaction: a review based on observational and global perspectives. J Geophys Res 101:7209–7225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carleton AM, Adegoke J, Allard JO, Arnold DL, Travis DJ (2001) Synoptic context of summer season land cover-convective cloud associations for the Midwest US “Corn Belt”. Geophys Res Lett 28:1679–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang JT, Wetzel PJ (1991) Effects of spatial variations of soil moisture and vegetation on the evolution of a prestorm environment: a numerical case study. Mon Weather Rev 119:1368–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chase TN, Pielke RA Sr, Kittel TGF, Nemani RR, Running SW (2000) Simulated impacts of historical land cover changes on global climate in northern winter. Clim Dyn 16:93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chase TN, Lawrence PT, Lee E (2007) Comparisons of the effect of land surface hydrology and deforestation on three Asian Monsoon systems. Workshop on detecting the atmospheric response to the changing face of the Earth: a focus on human-caused regional climate forcings, land-cover/land-use change, and data monitoring. Held on August 27–29, 2007, Boulder, CO. Accessed on Apr 2008
  14. Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land surface—hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Weather Rev 129:934–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon W-T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Menéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickinson RE, Henderson-Sellrs A, Kennedy PJ (1993) Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) version 1E as coupled to the NCAR community climate model. NCAR Tech. Note TN-387. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, p 72Google Scholar
  17. Dudhia J (1993) A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State–NCAR mesoscale model: validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon Weather Rev 121:1493–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feddema JJ, Oleson KW, Bonan GB, Mearns LO, Buja LE, Meehl GA, Washington WM (2005) The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science 310:1674–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Findell K, Eltahir E (1997) An analysis of the soil moisture–rainfall feedback based on direct observations from Illinois. Water Resour Res 33:725–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Findell KL, Eltahir EAB (2003) Atmospheric controls on soil moisture-boundary layer interactions: three-dimensional wind effects. J Geophys Res 108:D8,8385. doi:10.1029/2001JD001515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallus WA Jr, Segal M (2000) Sensitivity of forecast rainfall in a Texas convective system to soil moisture and convective parameterization. Weather Forecast 5:509–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordon LJ, Steffen W, Jonsson BF, Folke C, Falkenmark M, Johannessen A (2005) Human modifications of global water vapor flows from the land surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:7612–7617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hensiak JM, Raddatz RL, Lobban S (2004) Local initiation of deep convection on the Canadian Prairie provinces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 110:455–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hong S-Y, Pan H-L (1996) Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon Weather Rev 124:2322–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kain J (2004) The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteorol 43:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim J-E, Hong S-Y (2007) Impact of soil moisture anomalies on summer rainfall over East Asia: a regional climate model study. J Clim 20:5732–5743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koster RD, Dirmeyer PA, Zhichang G, Bonan G, Chan E, Cox P, Gordon CT, Kanae S, Kowalczyk E, Lawrence D, Liu P, Lu C-H, Malyshev S, McAvaney B, Mitchell K, Mocko D, Oki T, Oleson K, Pitman A, Sud YC, Taylor CM, Verseghy D, Vasic R, Xue Y, Yamada T (2004) Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science 305:1138–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lanicci JM, Carlson TN, Warner TT (1987) Sensitivity of the Great Plains severe storm environment to soil-moisture distribution. Mon Weather Rev 115:2660–2673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Avissar R (1999) A study of persistence in the land-atmosphere system with a fourth-order analytical model. J Clim 12:2154–2168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyons TJ (2002) Clouds prefer native vegetation. Meteorol Atmos Phys 80:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahmood R, Hubbard KG (2002) Anthropogenic land-use change in North American tall-grass transition and modification of near surface hydrologic cycle. Clim Res 21:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahmood R, Hubbard KG, Leeper D, Foster SA (2008) Increase in near-surface atmospheric moisture content due to land use changes: evidence from the observed dewpoint temperature data. Mon Weather Rev 136:1554–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahmood R, Pielke RA Sr, Hubbard KG, Niyogi D, Bonan G, Lawrence P, Baker B, McNider R, McAlpine C, Etter A, Gameda S, Qian B, Carleton A, Beltran-Przekurat A, Chase T, Quintanar AI, Adegoke JO, Vezhapparambu S, Conner G, Asefi S, Sertel E, Legates DR, Wu Y, Hale R, Frauenfeld ON, Watts A, Shepherd M, Mitra C, Anantharaj VG, Fall S, Lund R, Nordfelt A, Blanken P, Du J, Chang H-I, Leeper R, Nair US, Dobler S, Deo R, Syktus J (2010) Impacts of land use land cover change on climate and future research priorities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Narisma GT, Pitman AJ (2003) The impact of 200 years of land cover change on the Australian near-surface climate. J Hydrometeorol 4:424–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Numaguti A (1999) Origins and recycling processes of precipitating water over the Eurasian continent: experiments using an atmospheric general circulation model. J Geophys Res 104:1957–1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ookouchi Y, Segal M, Kessler RC, Pielke RA (1984) Evaluation of soil moisture effects on the generation and modification of mesoscale circulations. Mon Weather Rev 112:2281–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pal JS, Eltahir EAB (2001) Pathways relating soil moisture conditions to future summer rainfall within a model of the land–atmosphere system. J Clim 14:1227–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pant GB, Rupa Kumar K (1997) Climates of South Asia. Wiley, Hoboken, p 320Google Scholar
  39. Parthasarathy B, Munot AA, Kothawale DR (1995) All India monthly and seasonal rainfall series: 1871–1993. Theor Appl Climatol 49:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pielke RA (2001) Influence of the spatial distribution of vegetation and soils on the prediction of cumulus convection rainfall. Rev Geophys 39:151–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pielke RA, Adegoke J, Beltran-Przekurat A, Hiemstra CA, Lin J, Nair US, Niyogi D, Nobis TE (2007a) An overview of regional land use and land cover impacts on rainfall. Tellus Ser B 59:587–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pielke RA, Adegoke JO, Chase TN, Marshall CH, Matsui T, Niyogi D (2007b) A new paradigm for assessing the role of agriculture in the climate system and in climate change. Agric For Meteorol 142:234–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quintanar IA, Mahmood R, Loughrin J, Lovanh NC (2008) A coupled MM5–NOAH land surface model-based assessment of sensitivity of planetary boundary layer variables to anomalous soil moisture conditions. Phys Geogr 29:54–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Quintanar AI, Mahmood R, Motley MV, Yan J, Loughrin J, Lovanh N (2009) Simulation of boundary layer trajectory dispersion sensitivity to soil moisture conditions: MM5 and Noah-based investigation. Atmos Environ 43:3774–3785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rabin SM, Stadler S, Wetzel PS, Stensrud DJP, Gregory MDJ (1990) Observational effects of landscape variability on convective clouds. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 71:272–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raddatz RL (2003) Agriculture and tornadoes on the Canadian Prairies: potential impact of increasing atmospheric CO2 on summer severe weather. Nat Hazards 290:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raddatz RL (2007) Evidence for the influence of agriculture on weather and climate through the transformation and management of vegetation: illustrated by examples from the Canadian Prairies. Agric For Meteorol 142:186–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raddatz RL, Cummine JD (2003) Inter-annual variability of moisture flux from the prairie agro-ecosystem: impact of crop phenology on the seasonal pattern of tornado days. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 106:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ramankutty N, Foley J (1999) Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13:997–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schär C, Luthi D, Beyerle U (1999) The soil-precipitation feedback: a process study with a regional climate model. J Clim 12:722–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Segal M, Arrit RW (1992) Non-classical mesoscale circulations caused by surface sensible heat-flux gradients. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73:1593–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Segal M, Avissar R, McCumber CM, Pielke RA Sr (1988) Evaluation of vegetation effects on the generation and modification of meso-scale circulations. J Atmos Sci 45:2268–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Segal M, Arrit RW, Clark C, Rabin R, Brown J (1995) Scaling evaluation of the effect of surface characteristics on potential for deep convection over uniform terrain. Mon Weather Rev 123:383–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sen OL, Wang B, Wang Y (2004) Impacts of re-greening the desertified lands in Northwestern China: implications from a regional climate model experiments. J Meteorol Soc Japan 82:1679–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sen Roy S, Mahmood R, Niyogi DDS, Lei M, Foster SA, Hubbard KG, Douglas E, Pielke RA Sr (2007) Impacts of the agricultural Green Revolution induced land use changes on air temperatures in India. J Geophys Res 112:D21108. doi:10.1029/2007JD008834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sutton C, Hamill TM, Warner TT (2006) Will perturbing soil moisture improve warm-season ensemble forecasts? A proof of concept. Mon Weather Rev 134:3174–3188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shouraseni Sen Roy
    • 1
  • Rezaul Mahmood
    • 2
  • Arturo I. Quintanar
    • 2
  • Astrid Gonzalez
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Regional StudiesUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  2. 2.Meteorology Program, Department of Geography and Geology and Kentucky Climate CenterWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations