Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 98, Issue 3–4, pp 351–359 | Cite as

Trends in middle- and upper-level tropospheric humidity from NCEP reanalysis data

  • Garth PaltridgeEmail author
  • Albert Arking
  • Michael Pook
Original Paper


The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis data on tropospheric humidity are examined for the period 1973 to 2007. It is accepted that radiosonde-derived humidity data must be treated with great caution, particularly at altitudes above the 500 hPa pressure level. With that caveat, the face-value 35-year trend in zonal-average annual-average specific humidity q is significantly negative at all altitudes above 850 hPa (roughly the top of the convective boundary layer) in the tropics and southern midlatitudes and at altitudes above 600 hPa in the northern midlatitudes. It is significantly positive below 850 hPa in all three zones, as might be expected in a mixed layer with rising temperatures over a moist surface. The results are qualitatively consistent with trends in NCEP atmospheric temperatures (which must also be treated with great caution) that show an increase in the stability of the convective boundary layer as the global temperature has risen over the period. The upper-level negative trends in q are inconsistent with climate-model calculations and are largely (but not completely) inconsistent with satellite data. Water vapor feedback in climate models is positive mainly because of their roughly constant relative humidity (i.e., increasing q) in the mid-to-upper troposphere as the planet warms. Negative trends in q as found in the NCEP data would imply that long-term water vapor feedback is negative—that it would reduce rather than amplify the response of the climate system to external forcing such as that from increasing atmospheric CO2. In this context, it is important to establish what (if any) aspects of the observed trends survive detailed examination of the impact of past changes of radiosonde instrumentation and protocol within the various international networks.


Convective Boundary Layer Specific Humidity Latitude Zone Water Vapor Feedback Constant Relative Humidity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arking A (2005) Effects of bias in solar radiative transfer codes on global climate model simulations. Geophys Res Lett 32:L20717. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtsson L, Hagemann S, Hodges KI (2004) Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data? J Geophys Res 109:D11111. doi: 10.1029/2004JD004536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betts AK (1990) Greenhouse warming and the tropical water budget. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 71:1464–1465Google Scholar
  4. Bates JJ, Jackson DL (2001) Trends in upper-tropospheric humidity. Geophys Res Lett 28(9):1695–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bony S et al (2006) How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes. J Climate 19:3445–3482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen J, DelGenio AD, Carlson BE, Bosilovich MG (2008) The spatiotemporal structure of twentieth-century climate variations in observations and reanalysis Part II: Pacific pan-decadal variability. J Climate 21:2634–2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chou MD, Arking A (1980) Computation of infrared cooling rates in water vapour bands. J Atmos Sci 37:855–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chou MD, Kratz DP, Ridgway W (1991) Infrared radiation parameterizations in numerical climate models. J Climate 4:424–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Draper NR, Smith H (1998) Applied regression analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley Interscience, New York, p 706Google Scholar
  10. Elliott WP, Gaffen DJ (1991) On the utility of radiosonde humidity archives for climate studies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 72:1507–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guilderson TP, Schrag DP (1998) Abrupt shift in subsurface temperatures in the tropical Pacific associated with changes in El Nino. Science 281(5374):240–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IGRA (2008) Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive. See the ‘igra-stations.txt’ file available via
  13. Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kistler R et al (2001) The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindzen RS (1990) Some coolness concerning global warming. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 71:288–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindzen RS, Ming-Dah C, Hou AY (2001) Does the earth have an adaptive iris? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McClatchey RA, Fenn RW, Selby JEA, Volz FE, Garing JS (1972) Optical Properties of the Atmosphere, 3rd edn. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Report No. AFCRL-72-0497, L.G. Hanscom Field, Bedford MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Minschwaner K, Dessler AE (2004) Water vapor feedback in the tropical upper troposphere: model results and observations. J Climate 5:5–21Google Scholar
  19. NOAA (2008) Global climate at a glance. Available from National Climatic Data Center via
  20. Pierrehumbert RT, Brogniez H, Roca R (2007) On the relative humidity of the Earth’s atmosphere. In: Schneider T, Sobel AH (eds) The global circulation of the atmosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 143–185Google Scholar
  21. Rind D, Chiou EW, Chu W, Larsen J, Oltmans SW, Lerner J, McCormick MP, McMaster L (1991) Positive water vapour feedback in climate models confirmed by satellite data. Nature 349:500–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soden BJ, Held IM (2006) An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models. J Climate 19:3354–3360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soden BJ, Jackson DL, Ramaswamy V, Schwarzkopf MD, Xianglei H (2005) The radiative signature of upper tropospheric moistening. Science 310:841–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spencer RW, Braswell WD, Christy JR, Hnilo J (2007) Cloud and radiation budget changes associated with tropical intraseasonal oscillations. Geophy Res Lett 34:L15707. doi: 10.1029/2007GL029698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trenberth KE, Hoar TJ (1997) El Nino and climate change. Geophys Res Lett 24(23):3057–3060CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Biology Group, RSBSAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Centre for Australian Weather and Climate ResearchHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations