Summary
The current resolution of operational weather forecast model is not sufficient in general to explicitly resolve even the major cities of the World. As a consequence, urban areas have traditionally been neglected in such models. The introduction of tiled land surface models has enabled sub-gridscale landuse to be modelled, and hence has provided the opportunity to model cities within weather forecast models. However, to date there has been little effort made within the operational weather forecast community.
At present there is only one operational centre that explicitly resolves urban areas. This centre includes a simple urban scheme within its mesoscale and global models, which has been shown to have a positive impact on the forecast. However, with the recent developments within urban meteorology there are now a variety of urban schemes, which vary in their complexity and parameter requirements, that would be suitable for operational weather forecast models. So it is likely that more operational models, and in particular mesoscale models, will include urban areas in the near future.
With the majority of the World‘s population living in cities, the resilience of these cities to the impacts of climate change is also becoming of increasing interest. This means that urban areas will have to be included within climate change simulations, as well as weather forecast simulations, in the future. At present, only one climate change model has included a parametrisation for urban areas. However, this is likely to increase if work in this area grows rapidly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batchvarova E (2005) Progress in urban dispersion and air quality studies. Theor Appl Climatol (in press)
Best MJ (1998) Representing urban areas in numerical weather prediction models. Second urban environment symposium, Albuquerque, NM, November 2–6, 1998, American Meteorological Society, 45 Beacon St., Boston, MA, pp 148–151
Best MJ (2002) Urban areas in climate simulations. Fourth symposium on the urban environment, Norfolk, VA, May 20–24, 2002, American Meteorological Society, 45 Beacon St., Boston, MA, pp 9–10
R Bornstein Q Lin (2000) ArticleTitleUrban heat islands and summertime convective thunderstorms in Atlanta: three case studies. Atmos Environ 34 507–516 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00374-X
Brown MJ, Williams MD (1998) An urban canopy parameterization for mesoscale meteorological models. Second urban environment symposium, Albuquerque, NM, November 2–6, 1998, American Meteorological Society, 45 Beacon St., Boston, MA, pp 144–147
RLH Essery MJ Best RA Betts PM Cox CM Taylor (2003) ArticleTitleExplicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in a GCM land surface scheme. J Hydrometeorol 4 530–543
CSB Grimmond (2006) ArticleTitleProgress in measuring and observing the urban atmosphere. Theor Appl Climatol 84 3–22
M Kanda (2006) ArticleTitleProgress in the scale modeling of urban climate: Review. Theor Appl Climatol 84 23–33
A Lemonsu V Masson (2002) ArticleTitleSimulation of a summer urban breeze over Paris. Bound-Layer Meteor 104 463–490 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016509614936
A Martilli (2003) ArticleTitleA two-dimensional numerical study of the impact of a city on atmospheric circulation and pollutant dispersion in a coastal environment. Bound-Layer Meteor 108 91–119 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023044100064
A Martilli A Clappier MW Rotach (2002) ArticleTitleAn urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models. Bound-Layer Meteor 104 261–304 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016099921195
V Masson (2000) ArticleTitleA physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models. Bound-Layer Meteor 94 357–397 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1002463829265
V Masson (2006) ArticleTitleUrban surface modeling and the meso-scale impact of cities. Theor Applied Climatol 84 35–45
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Best, M. Progress towards better weather forecasts for city dwellers: from short range to climate change. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 84, 47–55 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-005-0143-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-005-0143-2