Abstract
This study investigates the impact of inversion layers on the dose due to air-born radioactive effluents at tropical coastal site Kalpakkam. Observations from a meteorological tower, GPS Sonde and SODAR are used to identify the presence of inversion conditions. A high resolution mesoscale model WRF is used to simulate the boundary layer meteorological fields. Sensitivity tests with two PBL schemes indicated that the non-local scheme YSU better produced the observed inversion characteristics. Both simulations and observations indicated that inversion layers are marked with strongly stable atmosphere characterized by steep positive temperature gradients and high values of bulk Richardson number. Simulations using FLEXPART dispersion model for hypothetical tracer release on typical days indicated that inversion condition leads to roughly 3 times higher ground level concentration compared to daytime unstable conditions due to confining the plume to a shallow surface layer. FLEXPART simulations using WRF-YSU meteorological data produced roughly 2 to 3 times higher concentrations during inversion condition and roughly 0.5 to 0.7 times lower concentration during daytime unstable condition compared to MYNN. Simulations conducted with FLEXPART for routine Ar-41 releases from an operational reactor at the coastal site suggest that the plume gamma dose rate during inversion condition is almost 2 to 3 times more compared to daytime convective unstable atmospheric condition. Analysis of simulated particle positions suggested that inversion layers trap the radioactive effluents, thereby lead to relatively higher dose rates compared to unstable daytime conditions. The study shows that inversion layers cause unfavourable conditions for dispersion of radioactive effluents and increases the radiological impact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data transparency FNL data used in the study is available at https://rda.ucar.edu/
Code availability
Software application or custom code. The Advanced Research WRF v4.0 is available at https://github.com/wrf-model/WRF/releases/tag/v4.0 The FLEXPART version 3.1 was obtained from https://www.flexpart.eu/
References
Asimakopoulos D, Helmis C, Michopoulos J (2004) Evaluation of Sodar methods for the determination of the atmospheric boundary layer mixing height. Meteorol Atmos Phys 85:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-003-0036-9
Balagurunathan MR, Jaison T, Thulasibrindha J, Kannan V (2007) Radiological dose assessment due to atmospheric releases of Argon-41 at Madras Atomic Power Station, Kalpakkam. Proceeding of 17th National Symposium on Radiation Physics (NSRP-17), Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, Nov. 14(16): 50–55.
Baumbach G, Vogt U (2003) Influence of inversion layers on the distribution of air pollutants in urban areas. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 3:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026098305581
Berg LK, Zhong S (2005) Sensitivity of MM5-Simulated Boundary Layer Characteristics to Turbulence Parameterizations. J Appl Meteorol 44(9):1467. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2292.1
Bourne SM, Bhatt US, Zhang J, Thoman R (2010) Surface-based temperature inversions in Alaska from a climate perspective. Atmosph Res. 95:2–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.09.013
Brioude J, Arias DA, Stohl A, Cassiani M, Morton D, Seibert P, Angevine W, Evan S, Dingwell A, Fast J, Easter R, Pisso I, Burkhart J, Wotawa G (2013) The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART-WRF version 3.1. Geosci Model Develop 6:1889–1904. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1889-2013
Czarnecka M (2017) Nidzgorska-Lencewicz J (2017) The impact of thermal inversion on the variability of PM10 concentration in winter seasons in Tricity. Environ Prot Eng 43:157–172. https://doi.org/10.5277/epe170213
Czarnecka M, Nidzgorska-Lencewicz J, Rawicki K (2018) Temporal structure of thermal inversions in Łeba (Poland). Theor Appl Climatol 136:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2459-8
Devasthale A, Willén U, Karlsson KG (2010) Jones CG (2010) Quantifying the clear-sky temperature inversion frequency and strength over the Arctic Ocean during summer and winter seasons from AIRS profiles. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 10:5565–5572. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5565-2010
Fast, JD, Easter RC (2006) A Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model Compatible with WRF. In: 7th WRF Users’ Workshop, NCAR, June 19e22. Boulder, CO, 6.2 p
Gopalakrishnan V, Boopathy M, Anjukumari VMK, Abhijay PM, Chandrasekaran S, Srinivas CV, Athmalingam S, Venkatraman B (2022) Design and development of a wireless autonomous gamma dose logger for real time radiation field inputs in decision support system. IGC Report. 396:332
Hanna SR (1982) Applications in Air Pollution Modeling. Edited by Nieuwstadt, F.T.M. and Van Dop, H. Atmospheric Turbulence and Air Pollution Modeling, Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland
Hariprasad KBRR, Srinivas CV, Bagavath Singh A, Bharkara Rao SV, Baskaran R, Venkatraman B (2014) Numerical simulation and intercomparison of boundary layer structure with different PBL schemes in WRF using experimental observations at a tropical site. Atmos Res 145–146(2014):27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.03.023
Hariprasad KBRR, Revanth B, Srinivas CV, Rakesh PT, Baskaran R, Venkatraman B (2019) Simulation of atmospheric dispersion of airborne effluent releases at a tropical coastal site under sea-breeze circulation and internal boundary layer development. Meteorol Atmos Phys 131(6):1617–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-019-0660-7
Hong SY, Noh Y, Dudhia J (2006) A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes. Mon Wea Rev 134:2318–2341. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1
Hu Y, Wang S, Ning G, Zhang Y, Wang J (2018) Shang Z (2018) A quantitative assessment of the air pollution purification effect of a super strong cold-air outbreak in January 2016 in China. Air Qual Atmos Health 11:907–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0592-2
Iacono MJ, Delamere JS, Mlawer EJ, Shephard MW, Clough SA, Collins WD (2008) Radiative forcing by long–lived greenhouse gases: calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J Geophys Res 113:D13103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944
Iyer US, Nagar SG (2011) Variability in surface inversion characteristics over India in winter during the recent decades. J Earth Syst Sci 120:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0069-2
Jesan T, Anand S, Manonmani C, Ravi PM, Tripathi RM (2018). Identification of Sea Breeze at Kalpakkam site. Conference: 20th NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENT at IIT-Gn, Gandhinagar 13 to15 December 2018.
Jimenez PA, Dudhia J, Fidel GRJ, Navarro J, Montavez JP, Elena GB (2012) A revised scheme for the WRF surface layer formulation. Mon Wea Rev 140:898–918. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00056.1
Kain JS (2004) The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: An update. J Appl Meteor 43:170–181. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043%3c0170:TKCPAU%3e2.0.CO;2
Kandil HA, Abdelkader MM, Moaty AA, Elhadidi B, Sherif AO (2006) Simulation of atmospheric temperature inversion over greater CAIRO using the MMS MESO-SCALE atmospheric model. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 9:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.010079
Karmakar S, Srinivas CV, Rakesh PT, Gopalakrishnan V, Chandrasekaran S, Athmalingam S, Venkatraman B (2022) Development of a numerical model for sector-average plume gamma dose and its validation with dose rate measurements at kalpakkam NPP site. India. J Environm Radioact. 255(21):107029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.107029
Largeron Y (2016) Staquet C (2016) Persistent inversion dynamics and wintertime PM10 air pollution in Alpine valleys. Atmos Environ 135:92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.045
Legg BJ, Raupach MR (1982) Markov-Chain simulation of particle dispersion in homogeneous flows: the mean drift velocity induced by gradient in Eulerian velocity variance. Bound Layer Meteorol. 24:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121796
Lim KS, Hong SY (2010) Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models. Mon Wea Rev 138:1587–1612. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2968.1
Lyamani H, Olmo FJ, Alados-Arboledas L (2010) Physical and optical properties of aerosols over an urban location in Spain: seasonal and diurnal variability. Atmos Chem Phys 10(1):239–254. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-239-2010
Malek E, Davis T, Martin RS (2006) Silva PJ (2005) meteorological and environmental aspects of one of the worst national air pollution episodes (January, 2004) in logan, cache valley, Utah. USA Atmos Res 79:108–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.05.003
McElroy JL (1969) A comparative study of urban and rural dispersion. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1969)008%3c0019:ACSOUA%3e2.0.CO;2
Mohan M, Siddiqui TA (1998) Analysis of various schemes for the estimation of atmospheric stability classifications. Atmos Environ 32(21):3775–3781
Nakanishi M, Niino H (2006) An improved mellor-yamada level 3 model: its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advecting fog. Bound Layer Meteor 119:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8
Nakanishi M, Niino H (2009) Development of an improved turbulence closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. J Meteor Soc Japan 87:895–912. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.87.895
Nidzgorska-Lencewicz J, Czarnecka M (2016) Rawicki K (2016) Thermal inversions and sulphure dioxide concentrations in some Polish cities in the winter season. J Elem 21:1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2016.21.1.1038
Palarz A, Celiński-Mysław D (2018) Ustrnul Z (2018) Temporal and spatial variability of surface-based inversions over Europe based on ERA-interim reanalysis. Int J Clim 38:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5167
Radhakrishnan D, Boopathy M, Gopalakrishnan V, Rakesh PT (2021) Long-term trends in gamma radiation monitoring at the multi-facility nuclear site Kalpakkam South-India. Radiat Prot Environm 44(2):79. https://doi.org/10.4103/rpe.rpe_18_21
Rakesh PT, Venkatesan R, Hedde T, Roubin P, Baskaran R (2015) Simulation of radioactive plume gamma dose over a complex terrain using Lagrangian particle dispersion model. J Environ Radioact 145:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.03.021
Revanth B, Srinivas CV, Venkatraman B (2022) Impact of sea-breeze circulation on the characteristics of convective thunderstorms over southeast India. Meteorol Atmosph Phys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-022-00941-2
Sandradewi J, Prévôt ASH, Szidat S, Perron N, Alfarra MR, Lanz VA, Weingartner E, Baltensperger URS (2008) Using aerosol light abosrption measurements for the quantitative determination of wood burning and traffic emission contribution to particulate matter. Environ Sci Technol 42(9):3316–3323. https://doi.org/10.1021/es702253m
Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Duda MG et al. (2008) A Description ofthe Advanced ResearchWRF Ver.3.0. In: Skamarock WC (eds) NCARTechnical Note NCAR/TN-475STR. Mesocale andMicroscale Meteorology Davison National Centre for Atmospheric Research. Boulder Colorado, USA
Srinivas CV (2005) Venkatesan R (2005) A simulation study of dispersion of air borne radionuclides from a nuclear power plant under a hypothetical accidental scenario at a tropical coastal site. Atmos Environ 39(8):1497–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.11.016
Srinivas CV, Rakesh PT, Baskaran R, Venkatran B (2017) Source term assessment using inverse modeling and environmental radiation measurements for nuclear emergency response. Air Qual Atmos Health 10:1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0495-7
Srinivas CV, Bagavath Singh A, Venkatesan R, Baskaran R (2011) Creation of benchmark meteorological observations for RRE on atmospheric flow field simulation at Kalpakkam. IGC Report-313
Stensrud DJ (2007) Parameterization Schemes: Keys to understanding Numerical Weather Prediction models. Cambridge University Press, USA
Stohl A, Forster C, Frank A, Seibert P, Wotawa G (2005) Technical Note: the lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 5:4739–4799
Stryhal J, Huth R, Sládek I (2017) Climatology of low-level temperature inversions at the Prague-Libušaerological station. Theor Appl Climatol 127(409):420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1639-z
Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Springer
Tewari M, Chen F, Wang W, Dudhia J, LeMone MA, Mitchell K, Ek M, Gayno G, Wegiel J, Cuenca RH (2004) Implementaion and verification of the unified NOAH land surface model in WRF model. 20th conference on weather analysis and forecasting/ 16th conference on numerical weather prediction, pp. 11–15.
Thomson JD (1987) Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 180:529–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112087001940
Turner DB (1970) Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates. U.S. Environ. Prot, Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
Whiteman CD, Zhong S, Shaw WJ, Hubbe JM, Bian X, Mittelstadt J (2001) Cold pools in the Columbia basin. Weather Forecast 16:432–447. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2001)016%3C0432:CPITCB%3E2.0.CO;2
Zhang Y, Seidel DJ, Golaz JC, Deser C (2011) Tomas RA (2011) climatological characteristics of arctic and antarctic surface-based inversions. J Clim 24:5167–5186. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4004.1
Zhang H, Xu T, Zong Y et al (2015) Influence of meteorological conditions on pollutant dispersion in street canyon. Procedia Eng 121:899–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.09.047
Funding
Information that explains whether and by whom the research was supported. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Optional: please review the submission guidelines from the journal whether statements are mandatory NA.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Ethical approval
Include appropriate approvals or waivers NA.
Consent to Participate
Include appropriate statements NA.
Consent for publication
Include appropriate statements NA.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Clemens Simmer, Ph.D.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kundu, D., Srinivas, C.V., Gopalakrishnan, V. et al. Study of atmospheric dispersion of radioactive effluents under inversion condition at coastal station Kalpakkam for radiological impact. Meteorol Atmos Phys 135, 22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-023-00962-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-023-00962-5