Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics

, Volume 128, Issue 3, pp 315–330 | Cite as

Atmospheric sensitivity to roughness length in a regional atmospheric model over the Ohio–Tennessee River Valley

  • Arturo I. Quintanar
  • Rezaul MahmoodEmail author
  • Astrid Suarez
  • Ronnie Leeper
Original Paper


The response of a regional atmospheric model to small changes in roughness length of two vegetation categories (crops and deciduous broadleaf forest) was analyzed for three synoptic events in June 2006. These were characterized by two convective events (June 11 and 22) and one prefrontal event (June 17). The responses of the model, for precipitation, equivalent potential temperature and wind field were notable in general. However, the response became muted as roughness lengths were increased or decreased. Atmospheric response to these changes varied for different convective events. A small dependence on roughness length was found for the sensible and latent heat fluxes and planetary boundary layer heights during the convective event of June 11. For the June 22 event, the model response was weaker for the crop-only and forest-only roughness length experiments compared to the response when both the crop and forest-only roughness length were changed in combination.


Latent Heat Flux Roughness Length Planetary Boundary Layer Height Deciduous Broadleaf Forest Precipitation Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments which helped to improve this paper. Thanks also go to Michael Grogan and Andrew Quilligan for technical assistance. This work is funded by the USDA Grant #58-6445-6-068 and benefited from a NSF Grant #UKRF 3048032200-07-248 and a NSF-EPSCoR grant.


  1. Allen T (2006) Flow over hills with variable roughness. Bound Layer Meteorol 121:475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avissar R, Pielke RA (1989) A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology. Mon Weather Rev 117:2113–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottema M, Klaassen W, Hopwood WP (1998) Landscape roughness parameters for Sherwood forest—experimental results. Bound Layer Meteorol 89:285–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carruthers DJ, Hunt CR (1990) Fluid mechanics of airflow over hills: turbulence, fluxes, and waves in the boundary layer. In: Blumen W (ed) Atmospheric processes over complex terrain. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 83–103Google Scholar
  5. Charney J, Quirck WJ, S-h Chow, Kornfield J (1977) A comparative study of the effects of albedo change on drought in semi-arid regions. J Atmos Sci 34:1366–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Weather Rev 129:569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng F, Byun D, Kim S (2003) Sensitivity study of the effects of land surface characteristics on meteorological simulations during the TexAQS2000 period in the Houston–Galveston area, 13th PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model Users’ Workshop, June 10–11, Boulder, CO.
  8. Chervin RM, Schneider SH (1976) On determining the statistical significance of climate experiments with general circulation models. J Atmos Sci 33:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claussens M (1991) Estimation of aerially-average surface fluxes. Bound Layer Meteorol 54:387–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Ridder K, Neirynck J, Mensik C (2004) Parameterising forest edge deposition using effective roughness length. Agric For Meteorol 123:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dorman JL, Sellers PJ (1989) A global climatology of albedo, roughness length and stomatal resistance for atmospheric general circulation models as represented by the simple biosphere model (SiB). J Appl Meteorol 28:833–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiments using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46:3077–3107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eng K, Brutsaert W (2002) How representative are local measurements of the surface shear stress for regional values? Adv Water Resour 25:1349–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finnigan JJ, Shaw RH, Patton EG (2009) Turbulence structure above a vegetation canopy. J Fluid Mech 637:387–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garratt JR (1993) Sensitivity of climate simulations to land–surface and atmospheric boundary-layer treatments—a review. J Clim 6:419–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garret AJ (1982) A parameter study of interactions between convective clouds the convective boundary layer, and a forested surface. Mon Weather Rev 110:1041–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grimmenes AA, Thue-Hansen V (2004) Annual variation of surface roughness obtained from wind profile measurements. Theor Appl Climatol 79:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form. J Appl Meteorol 38:1262–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harman IN (2012) The role of roughness sublayer dynamics within surface exchange schemes. Bound Layer Meteorol 142:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harman IN, Finnigan JJ (2007) A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Bound Layer Meteorol 123:339–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hassager CB, Nielsen WN, Jensen ON, Boegh E, Christensen HJ, Dellwik E, Soegaard H (2003) Effective roughness calculated from satellite-derived land cover maps and hedge-information used in a weather forecasting model. Bound Layer Meteorol 109:227–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hong SY, Pan HL (1996) Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon Weather Rev 124:2322–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kain J (2004) The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteorol 43:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leeper R, Mahmood R, Quintanar AI (2009) Near surface atmospheric response to simulated changes in land-cover, vegetation fraction, and soil moisture over Western Kentucky. Publ Climatol 62(2):41Google Scholar
  25. LeMone MA, Tewari M, Chen F, Alfieri JG, Niyogi D (2008) Evaluation of the Noah Land surface Model using data from a fair-weather IHOP_2002 day with heterogeneous surface fluxes. Mon Weather Rev 136:4915–4940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lettau H (1969) Note on Aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness element description. J Appl Meteorol 8:829–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahrt L, Ek M (1984) The influence of atmospheric stability on potential evaporation. J Clim Appl Meteorol 23:222–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McPherson RA, Stensrud VJ (2005) Influences of a winter wheat belt on the evolution of the boundary layer. Mon Weather Rev 133:2178–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mesinger F, Mego G, Kalnay E, Mitchell K, Shafran PC, Ebisuzaki W, Jović D, Woollen J, Rogers E, Berbery EH, Ek MB, Fan Y, Grumbine R, Higgins W, Li H, Lin Y, Manikin G, Parrish D, Shi W (2006) North American regional analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:343–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oke TR (1987) Boundary layer climates, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, p 435Google Scholar
  31. Pielke RA (1973) A three-dimensional numerical model of the sea breezes over south Florida. Mon Weather Rev 102:115–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pielke RA, Marland G, Betts RA, Chase TN, Eastman JL, Niles JO, Niyogi D, Running SW (2002) The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of green house gases. Philos Trans R Soc 360:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pitman AJ, Narisma GT, Pielke RA, Holbook NJ (2004) Impact of land cover change on the climate of southwest Western Australia. J Geophys Res 109:D18109. doi: 10.1029/2003JDD004347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quintanar AI, Mahmood R, Loughrin J, Lovahn N (2008) A coupled MM5-Noah land surface model-based assessment of sensitivity of planetary boundary layer variables to anomalous soil moisture conditions. Phys Geogr 29:56–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quintanar AI, Mahmood R, Motley MV, Yan J, Loughrin J, Lovahn N (2009) Simulation of boundary layer trajectories dispersion sensitivity to soil moisture conditions: MM5 and Noah-based investigation. Atmos Environ 43:3774–3785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raupach MR (1994) Simplified expressions for vegetation roughness length and zero-plane displacement as function of canopy area height and area index. Bound Layer Meteorol 71:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sud CY, Smith WE (1984) The influence of surface roughness of deserts on the July circulation. Bound Layer Meteorol 33:15–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sud YC, Smith WE (1985) Influence of local land-surface on the Indian monsoon: a numerical study. J Clim Appl Meteorol 24:1015–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sud YC, Shukla J, Mintz Y (1988) Influence of land surface roughness on atmospheric circulation and precipitation: a sensitivity study with a general circulation model. J Appl Meteorol 27:1036–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sugita M, Brutsaert W (1992) The stability functions in the bulk similarity formulation for the unstable boundary layer. Bound Layer Meteorol 61:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson RS (1978) Note on the aerodynamic roughness length for complex terrain. J Appl Meteorol 17:1042–1043Google Scholar
  43. Troen I, Mahrt L (1986) A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer model: sensitivity to surface evaporation. Bound Layer Meteorol 37:129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weligepolage K, Gieske ASM, van der Tol C, Timmermans J, Su Z (2012) Effect of sub-layer corrections on the roughness parameterization of a Douglas fir forest. Agric For Meteorol 162–163:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wieringa J (1992) Representative roughness parameters for homogeneous terrain. Bound Layer Meteorol 63:323–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu Y, Nair US, Pielke RA, McNider RT, Christopher SA, Anantharaj VG (2009) Impact of land surface heterogeneity on mesoscale atmospheric dispersion. Bound Layer Meteorol 133:367–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zehnder JA (2002) Simple modifications to improve fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model performance for the Phoenix, Arizona, Metropolitan Area. J Appl Meteorol 9:971–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang D-L, Zheng WZ (2004) Diurnal cycles of surface winds and temperatures as simulated by five boundary layer parameterizations. J Appl Meteorol 43:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arturo I. Quintanar
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Rezaul Mahmood
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Astrid Suarez
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • Ronnie Leeper
    • 2
    • 3
    • 6
  1. 1.Meteorology ProgramWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography and GeologyWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  3. 3.Kentucky Climate CenterWestern Kentucky UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  4. 4.Centro de Ciencias de la AtmosferaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexicoMexico
  5. 5.Department of MeteorologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  6. 6.Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites (CICS)North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations