Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis and quantification of contrasts in observed meteorological fields for foggy and non-foggy days

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genesis and dynamics of fog take place under certain meteorological conditions. Thus quantification of the differences in different meteorological variables between foggy and non-foggy days can provide insight into the dynamics of fog; such contrasts can also help to identify and quantify precision and the accuracy required in the meteorological forecasts for driving fog prediction models. However, systematic evidence and quantification of differences in meteorological variables for foggy and non-foggy days are missing. Based on analyses of composites of differences between meteorological variables (temperature, relative humidity, wind and dew-depression) for days with no fog, mild fog and dense fog (based on visibility) days over Delhi, a fog-prone metropolis, we show that consistent and appreciable distinctions exist between days with fog and no fog (characterized in terms of hourly visibility) for both December and January. An important finding is that the differences persist not only near the surface, but also at 850 hPa level. Expectedly but consistently, the contrasts were stronger for long-duration (duration ≥4 h) than those for short duration (duration <2 h) fog; the contrasts were also stronger for dense (visibility <500 m) fog. The average differences between non-foggy and dense fog (duration ≥4 h) in composite temperature, relative humidity and wind are of the order of 3 °C, 10 % and 5 m/s, respectively; these findings can help to assess and validate meteorological forecasts for driving fog prediction. Fog is a high-impact event over many locations world-wide; while the present analysis is for a specific location, the methodology is generic to be applied over any fog-prone location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens DC (1988) Meteorology today. West Publishing Company, New York, p 171

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali K, Momin GA, Tiwari S, Safai PD, Chate DM, Rao PSP (2004) Fog and precipitation chemistry at Delhi, North India. Atmos Environ 38:4215–4222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmik SKR, Sud AM, Singh C (2004) Forecasting fog over Delhi—an objective method. Mausam 55(2):313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott A, Trautmann T (2002) PAFOG—a new efficient forecast model of radiation fog and low-level stratiform clouds. Atmos Res 64(1–4):191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R, Roach WT (1976) The physics of radiation fog: II–a numerical study. Q J R Meteorol Soc 102:335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury S, Rajpala H, Sarafa AK, Panda S (2007) Mapping and forecasting of North Indian winter fog: an application of spatial technologies. Int J Remote Sens 28:3649–3663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choularton TW et al (1981) A field study of radiation fog in Meppen. West Germany. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 107:381–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark PA, Hopwood WP (2001) One-dimensional Site-specific forecasting of radiation fog. Part I: model formulation and idealized sensitivity studies. Meteorol Appl 8:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynkerke PG (1991) Radiation fog: a comparison of model simulation with detailed observation. Mon Weather Rev 11:324–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuzzi S et al (1992) The Po valley fog experiment 1989: anoverview. Tellus Set B J4:448–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami P, Rakesh V, Patra GK, Prakash VS (2012) Real-time quantitative rainfall forecasts at hobli-level over Karnataka: evaluation for the winter monsoon 2010. Curr Sci 102(10):1426–1433. (http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/102/10/1426.pdf)

  • Gultepe I et al (2007) Fog research: a review of past achievements and future perspectives. Pure appl Geophys 164:1121–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houssos EE et al (2012) On the atmospheric circulation characteristics associated with fog in Ioannina, north-western Greece. Int J Climatol 32(12):1847–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman GJ, Adler RF, Bolvin DT, Gu G, Nelkin EJ, Bowman KP, Hong Y, Stocker EF, Wolff DB (2007) The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J Hydrometeorol 8:38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenamani RK (2007) Alarming rise in fog and pollution causing a fall in maximum temperature over Delhi. Curr Sci 93(3):314–322. (http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Downloads/article_id_093_03_0314_0322_0.pdf)

  • Meyer MB, Jiusto JE (1986) FOG-82: a cooperative field study of radiation fog. Bull Am Meteor Soc 67:825–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MB, Lala GG (1990) Climatological aspects of radiation fog occurrence at Albany, New York. J Clim 3(5):577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra AK, SankarNath, Sharma AK (2008) Fog forecasting using rule-based fuzzy inference system. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 36(3):243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi M (2000) Large-eddy simulation of radiation fog. Bound Layer Meteor 94:461–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagowski M, Gultepe I, King P (2004) Analysis and modeling of an extremely dense fog event in Southern Ontario. J Appl Meteor 43:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasricha PK, Gera BS, Shastri S, Maini HK, Ghosh AB, Tiwari MK, Garg SC (2003) Role of the water vapor greenhouse effect in the forecasting of fog occurrence. Bound Layer Meteorol 107(2):469–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakesh V, Goswami P (2014) Evaluation of high resolution rainfall forecasts over Karnataka for the 2011 southwest and northeast monsoon seasons. Meteorol Appl. doi:10.1002/met.1438

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach WT, Brown R, Caughey SJ, Garland JA, Readings CJ (1976) The physics of radiation fog: I- a field study. Q J R Meteorol Soc 102:313–333. doi:10.1002/qj.49710243204

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodhe B (1962) The effect of turbulence on fog formation. Tellus 14(1):49–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraf AK, Bora AK, Das JD, Rawat V, Sharma K and Jain SK (2010) Winter fog over the Indo-Gangetic Plains: mapping and modelling using remote sensing and GIS. Nat Hazards 58(1):199–220. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9660-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch RM, Ravichandran MG, Cox SK (1986) Prediction of quasi-periodic oscillations in radiation fogs. Part I: comparison of simple similarity approaches. J Atmos Sci 43:633–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou B, Ferrier BS (2008) Asymptotic analysis of equilibrium in radiation fog. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47(6):1704–1722. doi:10.1175/2007JAMC1685.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a research grant under a network project, Integrated Analysis for Impact, Mitigation and Sustainability (IAIMS), CSIR, Government of India. The high-performance computing (HPC) facility of CSIR Centre for Mathematical modeling and Computer Simulation Institute (CSIR C-MMACs) is acknowledged gratefully for providing fast access to archived data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Goswami.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: R. Roebeling.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

703_2015_384_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 637 kb) Supplementary Fig. S1 Wintertime (December-January) climatology (1980-2012) of (a) surface temperature, (b) surface relative humidity and (c) sea level pressure and 1000 mb wind vectors from NCEP (2.5° × 2.5°) reanalysis data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goswami, P., Sarkar, S. Analysis and quantification of contrasts in observed meteorological fields for foggy and non-foggy days. Meteorol Atmos Phys 127, 605–623 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-015-0384-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-015-0384-2

Keywords

Navigation