Advertisement

Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics

, Volume 116, Issue 3–4, pp 95–111 | Cite as

Observed and simulated sea breeze characteristics over Rayong coastal area, Thailand

  • Tung Thanh Phan
  • Kasemsan ManomaiphiboonEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This work presents the detailed characterization of sea breeze (SB) over the Rayong coastal area, one of the most rapidly developed and highly industrialized areas during the last decade in Thailand, using observation data analysis and fine-resolution (2 km) mesoscale meteorological modeling with incorporation of new land cover and satellite-derived vegetation fraction data sets. The key characteristics considered include frequency of SB occurrence, sea-breeze day (SBD) identification, degree of inland penetration, and boundary layer development. It was found that SBs occur frequently in the winter due mainly to relatively large land–sea temperature contrasts and minimally in the wet season. Monthly mean SB onset and cessation times are at around 12–15 local time (LT) and 18–21 LT, respectively, and its strength peaks during the early- to mid-afternoon. Monthly SB hodographs generally exhibit clockwise rotations, and SB inland penetration (at PCD-T tower) ranges widely with the monthly means of 25–55 km from the coast. Mesoscale MM5 modeling was performed on two selected SBDs (13 January and 16 March 2006), on which the SBs are under weak and onshore strong influences from background winds, respectively. Simulated near-surface winds and temperature were found to be in fair-to-acceptable agreement with the observations. The SB circulation along the Rayong coast is clearly defined with a return flow aloft and a front on 13 January, while it is enhanced by the onshore background winds on 16 March. Another SB along the Chonburi coast also develops separately, but their fronts merge into one in the mid-afternoon, resulting in large area coverage by the SB. Simulated planetary boundary layer height over the land area is significantly affected by a thermal internal boundary layer (TIBL) induced by an SB, which is found to be low near the coast and increases toward the front (up to 800–1,000 m along the Rayong coast).

Keywords

Local Time Background Wind Planetary Boundary Layer Height Land Breeze Thermal Internal Boundary Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the Pollution Control Department, the Department of Energy Development and Efficiency, the Land Development Department, and the Thai Meteorological Department for providing local data, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (US) for the availability of the MM5 model, and the National Centers for Environmental Protection (US) for the FNL Reanalysis and RTG SST data. The authors also thank Dr. Robert H. B. Exell and Dr. Chumnong Sorapipatana (JGSEE), Dr. Dusadee Sukawat (KMUTT), Mr. Nawarat Mitjit (PCD), and the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions. Assistance by members at the JGSEE computational laboratory is acknowledged. This study was financially supported mainly by the JGSEE and the Thailand Research Fund (under Grant No. RDG5050016) and partially by the Postgraduate Education and Research Development Office (under Grant No. JGSEE/PROJECT/002-2011) and the National Research Council of Thailand (under Grant No. POR KOR 2550-46).

Supplementary material

703_2012_185_MOESM1_ESM.doc (312 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 312 kb)

References

  1. Abbs DJ, Physick WL (1992) Sea breeze observations and modeling: a review. Aust Meteorol Mag 41:7–9Google Scholar
  2. Arritt RW (1992) Effects of the large-scale flow on characteristic features of the sea breeze. J Appl Meteor 32:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azorin-Molina C, Chen D (2008) A climatological study of the influence of synoptic-scale flows on sea breeze evolution in the Bay of Alicante (Spain). Theor Appl Climatol 96:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borne K, Chen D, Nunez M (1998) A method for finding sea-breeze days under stable synoptic conditions and its application to the Swedish west coast. Int J Climatol 18:901–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai XM, Steyn DG (2000) Modelling study of sea breezes in a complex coastal environment. Atmos Environ 34:2873–2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land–surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Wea Rev 129:569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen XL, Feng YR, Li JN, Lin WS, Fan SJ, Wang AY, Fong SK, Lin H (2009) Numerical simulations on the effect of sea–land breezes on atmospheric haze over the Pearl River Delta region. Environ Model Assess 14:351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crosman ET, Horel JD (2010) Sea and lake breezes: a review of numerical studies. Bound Layer Meteorol 137:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dandou A, Tombrou M, Soulakellis N (2009) The influence of the city of Athens on the evolution of the sea breeze front. Bound Layer Meteorol 131:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding AJ, Wang T, Zhao M, Wang TJ, Li ZK (2004) Simulation of sea–land breezes and a discussion of their implications on the transport of air pollution during a multi-day ozone episode in the Pearl River Delta of China. Atmos Environ 38:6737–6750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (EC-JRC) (2003) Global Land Cover 2000 database Website: http://bioval.jrc.ec.europa.eu/products/glc2000/glc2000.php. Accessed: September 2009
  12. Furberg M, Steyn DG, Baldi M (2002) The climatology of sea breezes on Sardinia. Int J Climatol 22:917–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gemmill, William, Bert Katz, Xu Li (2007) Daily real-time global sea surface temperature-high resolution analysis at NOAA/NCEP. NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB Office Note Nr. 260. Website: http://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/sst. Accessed September 2008
  14. Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1994) A Description of the fifth generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). Technical Note, NCAR, Boulder, Colorado, USGoogle Scholar
  15. Gutman G, Ignatov A (1997) Satellite derived green vegetation fraction for the use in numerical weather prediction models. Adv Space Res 19:477–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hadi TW, Horinouchi T, Tsuda T, Hashiguchi H, Fukao S (2002) Sea-breeze circulation over Jakarta, Indonesia: a climatology based on boundary layer radar observations. Mon Wea Rev 130:2153–2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haurwitz B (1947) Comments on the sea-breeze circulation. J Meteorol 4:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helmis CG, Papadopoulos KH, Kalogiros JA, Soilemes AT, Asimakopoulos DN (1995) Influence of background flow on evolution of Saronic Gulf sea breeze. Atmos Environ 29:3689–3701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janjic ZI (1994) The step-mountain ETA coordinate model: further development of the convection, viscous sublayer and turbulent closure schemes. Mon Wea Rev 122:927–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joseph B, Bhatt BC, Koh TY, Chen S (2008) Sea breeze simulation over the Malay Peninsula in an intermonsoon period. J Geophys Res 113:d20122. doi: 10.1029/2008jd010319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kain JS (2004) The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteor 43:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kusuda M, Alpert P (1983) Anti-clockwise rotation of the wind hodograph. Part I: theoretical study. J Atmos Sci 40:487–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LDD (2007) Land use and land cover data of Thailand for the years 2006–2007. CD-ROM Product, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin WS, Wang AY, Wu CS, Fong SK, Ku CM (2001) A case modeling of sea–land breeze in Macao and its neighborhood. Adv Atmos Sci 18:1231–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu X, Chow KC, Yao T, Lau AKH, Fung JCH (2009) Effects of urbanization on the land sea breeze circulation over the Pearl River Delta region in winter. Int J Climatol 30:1089–1104Google Scholar
  26. Manomaiphiboon K, Prabamroong A, Chanaprasert W, Rajpreeja N, Phan TT (2010) Dual database system of wind resource for Thailand. Final Report of Project “Wind Resource Assessment Using Advanced Atmospheric Modeling and GIS Analysis”, Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (in Thai, with English Abstract). Website: http://complabbkt.jgsee.kmutt.ac.th/wind_proj Accessed: August 2010
  27. Miao JF, Kroon LJM, Vilà-Guerau de Arellano J, Holtslag AAM (2003) Impacts of topography and land degradation on the sea breeze over eastern Spain. Meteorol Atmos Phys 84:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miao JF, Chen D, Borne K (2007) Evaluation and comparison of Noah and Pleim-Xiu land surface models in MM5 using GÖTE2001 data: spatial and temporal variations in near-surface air temperature. J Appl Meteor Climatol 46:1587–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miao JF, Chen D, Wyser K, Borne K, Lindgren J, Strandevall MKS, Thorsson S, Achberger C, Almkvist E (2008) Evaluation of MM5 mesoscale model at local scale for air quality applications over the Swedish west coast: influence of PBL and LSM parameterizations. Meteorol Atmos Phys 99:77–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miao JF, Wyser K, Chen D, Ritchie H (2009) Impacts of boundary layer turbulence and land surface process parameterizations on simulated sea breeze characteristics. Ann Geophys 27:2303–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller STK, Keim BD, Talbot RW, Mao H (2003) Sea breeze: structure, forecasting, and impacts. Rev Geophys 41:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. NASA Landsat Program (2010) Landsat scenes from epoch 2005 collection. Website: http://landsat.usgs.gov. Accessed August 2010
  33. National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) (2010) FNL operational model global tropospheric analyses. Website: http://dss.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2. Accessed September 2008
  34. Papanastasiou DK, Melas D (2009) Climatology and impact on air quality of sea breeze in an urban coastal environment. Int J Climatol 29:305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Papanastasiou DK, Melas D, Lissaridis I (2010) Study of wind field under sea breeze conditions; an application of WRF model. Atmos Res 98:102–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pham TBT, Manomaiphiboon K, Vongmahadlek C (2008) Development of an inventory and temporal allocation profiles of emissions from power plants and industrial facilities in Thailand. Sci Total Environ 397:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pielke RA, Cotton WR, Walko RL, Tremback CJ, Lyons WA, Grasso LD, Nicholls ME, Moran MD, Wesley DA, Lee TJ, Copeland JH (1992) A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS. Meteorol Atmos Phy 49:69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pollution Control Department (PCD) (2007) Thailand state of pollution in 2006. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Website: http://www.pcd.go.th/count/mgtdl.cfm?FileName=Report_Eng2549.pdf. Accessed: September 2009
  39. Pushpadas D, Vethamony P, Sudheesh K, George S, Babu MT, Nair TMB (2010) Simulation of coastal winds along the central west coast of India using the MM5 mesoscale model. Meteorol Atmos Phys 109:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simpson JE (1994) Sea breeze and local winds. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG (2005) A description of the advanced research WRF Version 2. Technical Note 468 + STR, NCAR, Boulder, Colorado, USGoogle Scholar
  42. Srinivas CV, Venkatesan R, Somayaji KM, Singh AB (2006) A numerical study of sea breeze circulation observed at a tropical site Kalpakkam on the east coast of India, under different synoptic flow situations. J Earth Syst Sci 115:557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thai Meteorological Department (TMD) (2010) Climate of Thailand. Ministry of Information and Communication Technology. Website: http://www.tmd.go.th/en/archive/surfacewind.php. Accessed: September 2009
  44. Thepanondh S, Varoonphan J, Sarutichart P, Makkasap T (2010) Airborne volatile organic compounds and their potential health impact on the vicinity of petrochemical industrial complex. Water Air Soil Pollut. doi: 10.1007/s11270-010-0406-0 Google Scholar
  45. van Ulden AP, Holtslag AAM (1985) Estimation of atmospheric boundary layer parameters for diffusion applications. J. Clim Appl Meteorol 24:1196–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. VITO (2010) Free vegetation products. Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Belgium. Website: http://free.vgt.vito.be. Accessed September 2009

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE)King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT)BangkokThailand
  2. 2.Center for Energy Technology and Environment, Ministry of EducationBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations