Abstract
Single-channel lidar is a widely used system in atmospheric aerosol and cloud detection. However, many difficulties remain in the automatic and accurate identification of cloud from backscatter signals. Popular methods have been proposed, but there is still large uncertainty in cloud detection, especially when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. In this study, a signal simplification approach based on an improved Douglas-Peucker algorithm is proposed. The layer base and top are then selected using the simplified signal and the raw range-corrected signal. Finally, we use a peak-to-base ratio function to distinguish a cloud layer from a non-cloud layer. The detection results of our algorithm are remarkably better than those obtained using the differential zero-crossing method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badarinath KVS, Kharol SK et al (2011) Characterization of aerosol optical depth, aerosol mass concentration, UV irradiance and black carbon aerosols over Indo-Gangetic plains, India, during fog period. Meteorol Atmos Phys 111:65–73
Ben-David A, Davidson CE et al (2007) Lidar detection algorithm for time and range anomalies. Appl Optics 46:7275–7288
BenZvi SY, Cester R et al (2007) The lidar system of the Pierre Auger observatory. Nucl Instrum Methods A 574:171–184
Bösenberg J, Ansmann A et al (2001) EARLINET: a European aerosol research lidar network. Advances in laser remote sensing, Selected Papers of the 20th International Laser Radar Conference, Vichy, pp 155–158
Brooks IM (2003) Finding boundary layer top: application of a wavelet covariance transform to lidar backscatter profiles. J Atmos Ocean Tech 20:1092–1105
Day DE, Malm WC (2001) Aerosol light scattering measurements as a function of relative humidity: a comparison between measurements made at three different sites. Atmos Environ 35:5169–5176
Diggle P (1985) A kernel method for smoothing point process data. Appl Stat 34:138–147
Douglas DH, Peucker TK (1973) Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. Cartographica Int J Geogr Inform Geovisualization 10:112–122
Flamant C, Pelon J et al (1997) Lidar determination of the entrainment zone thickness at the top of the unstable marine atmospheric boundary layer. Bound-lay Meteorol 83:247–284
Gaumet JL, Heinrich JC et al (1998) Cloud-base height measurements with a single-pulse erbium-glass laser ceilometer. J Atmos Ocean Tech 15:37–45
Keogh E, Chu S et al (2001). An online algorithm for segmenting time series. In: Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining pp 289–296
Kovalev VA, Eichinger WE (2004) Elastic lidar: theory, practice, and analysis methods. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Kovalev VA, Newton J et al (2005) Simple algorithm to determine the near-edge smoke boundaries with scanning lidar. Appl Optics 44:1761–1768
Liou KN (2002) An introduction to atmospheric radiation. Academic Press, San Diego
Mao F, Gong W et al (2010) Cloud detection and coefficient retrieve based on improved differential zero-crossing method for Mie lidar. Acta Optica Sinica 30:3097–3102 (in Chinese)
Morille Y, Haeffelin M et al (2007) STRAT: an automated algorithm to retrieve the vertical structure of the atmosphere from single-channel lidar data. J Atmos Ocean Tech 24:761–775
Pal SR, Steinbrecht W et al (1992) Automated method for lidar determination of cloud-base height and vertical extent. Appl Optics 31:1488–1494
Ramanathan V, Cess RD et al (1989) Cloud-radiative forcing and climate: results from the earth radiation budget experiment. Science 243:57
Ramsay JO, Silverman BW (1998) Functional data analysis. Stat Comput 8:401–403
Saalfeld A (1999) Topologically consistent line simplification with the Douglas–Peucker algorithm. Cartogr Geogr Inform Sci 26:7–18
Steyn DG, Baldi M et al (1999) The detection of mixed layer depth and entrainment zone thickness from lidar back scatter profiles. J Atmos Ocean Tech 16:953–959
Wang Z, Sassen K (2001) Cloud type and macrophysical property retrieval using multiple remote sensors. J Appl Meteorol 40:1665–1682
Weibel R (1997) Generalization of spatial data: principles and selected algorithms. Algorithm Found Geogr Inform Syst 1340(1997):99–152
Welton EJ, Campbell JR et al (2001) Global monitoring of clouds and aerosols using a network of micro-pulse lidar systems, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, pp 151–158
Winker DM, Vaughan MA (1994) Vertical distribution of clouds over Hampton, Virginia observed by lidar under the ECLIPS and FIRE ETO programs. Atmos Res 34:117–133
Winker DM, Pelon JR et al (2003) The CALIPSO mission: Spaceborne lidar for observation of aerosols and clouds. Proc SPIE 4893:1–11
Worthington RM (2009) Radar measurement of the effect of boundary-layer saturation on mountain-wave amplitude. Meteorol Atmos Phys 105:29–35
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by 973 Program (2009CB723905, 2011CB707106), the NSFC (10978003, 40871171).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: C. Simmer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gong, W., Mao, F. & Song, S. Signal simplification and cloud detection with an improved Douglas-Peucker algorithm for single-channel lidar. Meteorol Atmos Phys 113, 89–97 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-011-0144-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-011-0144-x