Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of four ensemble methods combining regional climate simulations over Asia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of uncertainties exist in climate simulation because the results of climate models are influenced by factors such as their dynamic framework, physical processes, initial and driving fields, and horizontal and vertical resolution. The uncertainties of the model results may be reduced, and the credibility can be improved by employing multi-model ensembles. In this paper, multi-model ensemble results using 10-year simulations of five regional climate models (RCMs) from December 1988 to November 1998 over Asia are presented and compared. The simulation results are derived from phase II of the Regional Climate Model Inter-comparison Project (RMIP) for Asia. Using the methods of the arithmetic mean, the weighted mean, multivariate linear regression, and singular value decomposition, the ensembles for temperature, precipitation, and sea level pressure are carried out. The results show that the multi-RCM ensembles outperform the single RCMs in many aspects. Among the four ensemble methods used, the multivariate linear regression, based on the minimization of the root mean square errors, significantly improved the ensemble results. With regard to the spatial distribution of the mean climate, the ensemble result for temperature was better than that for precipitation. With an increasing number of models used in the ensembles, the ensemble results were more accurate. Therefore, a multi-model ensemble is an efficient approach to improve the results of regional climate simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Casanova S, Ahrens B (2009) On the weighting of multimodel ensembles in seasonal and short-range weather forecasting. Mon Wea Rev 137:3811–3822. doi:10.1175/2009MWR2893.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves RR, Ross RS, Krishnamurti TN (2005) Weather and seasonal climate prediction for South America using a multi-model superensemble. Int J Climatol 25:1881–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JH, Machenhauer B, Jones RG et al (1997) Validation of present-day regional climate simulations over Europe: LAM simulations with observed boundary conditions. Clim Dyn 13:489–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson RE, Errico RM, Giorgi F, Bates GT (1989) A regional climate model for the western United States. Clim Change 15:383–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblas-Reyes FJ, Hagedorn R, Parmer TN (2005) The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting–II. Calibration and combination. Tellus 57A:234–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein E (1969) Stochastic dynamic prediction. Tellus 21:739–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng JM, Fu CB (2006) Inter-comparison of 10-year precipitation simulated by several RCMs for Asia. Adv Atmos Sci 23(4):531–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu CB, Zeng ZM (1998) Monsoon regions: the highest rate of precipitation changes observed from global data. Chin Sci Bull 43:662–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu CB, Wei HL, Qian Y (2000) Documentation on a regional integrated environment model system (RIEMS version 1), TEACOM Science Report No.1, START Regional Committee for Temperate East Asia, Beijing, China, pp 26

  • Fu CB, Wang SY, Xiong Z, Gutowski WJ, Lee DK, McGregor JL, Sato Y, Kato H, Kim JW, Suh MS (2005) Regional climate model intercomparison project for Asia. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F (1990) Simulation of regional climate using a limited area model nested in general circulation model. J Clim 2(3):941–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang I-S, Yoo JH (2006) Examination of multi-model ensemble seasonal prediction methods using a simple climate system. Clim Dyn 26:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato H, Nishizawa K, Hirakuchi H et al (2001) Performance of RegCM2.5/NCAR-CSM nested system for the simulation of climate change in East Asia caused by global warming. J Meteor Soc Jpn 79:99–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharin VV, Zwiers FW (2002) Climate predictions with multimodel ensembles. J Clim 15:793–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti TN, Kishtawal CM, LaRow T et al (1999) Improved weather and seasonal climate forecasts from multimodel superensemble. Science 285:1548–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti TN, Kishtawal CM, Zhang Z et al (2000) Multimodel ensemble forecasts for weather and seasonal climate. J Clim 13:4196–4216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacis AA, Hansen JE (1974) A parameterization for the absorption of solar radiation in the earth’s atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 31:118–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DK, Kang HS (1999) Coupling of the NCAR/LSM into the MM5 and its application for the East Asian summer monsoon. Preprints, Ninth PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model Users, Workshop, Boulder, CO, NCAR, 198–201

  • Leith CE (1974) Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecast. Mon Wea Rev 102:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic non-periodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi K, Sato Y, Kida H, Saigusa N, Oikawa T (1997) A Biosphere-Atmosphere Interaction Model (BAIM) and its primary verifications using grassland data. Meteor Geophys 47:115–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabuchi K, Sato Y, Kida H (2002) Verification of the climatic features of a regional climate model with BAIM. J Meteor Soc Jpn 80:621–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor JL (1996) Semi-Lagrangian advection on conformal-cubic grids. Mon Wea Rev 124:1311–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor LJ, Katzfey JJ (1998) Simulating typhoon recurvature with a variable resolution conformal-cubic model. Research activities in atmospheric and oceanic modeling, WMO/TD-No.942, 3.19-3.20

  • Mellor GL, Yamada T (1974) A hierarchy of turbulent closure models for planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 31:1791–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer TN, Alessandri A, Andersen U et al (2004) Development of a European Multimodel Ensemble System for Seasonal-to-Interannual Prediction (DEMETER). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 85:853–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng P, Kumar A, van den Dool H (2002) An analysis of multimodel ensemble predictions for seasonal climate anomalies. J Geophys Res 107:4710. doi:10.1029/2002JD002712

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugi M, Kuma K, Tada K, Tamiya K, Hasegawa N, Iwasaki T, Yamada S, Kitade T (1990) Description and performance of the JMA operational global spectral model (JMA-GSM89). Geophys Mag 43:105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Takle ES, Gutowski WJ, Arritt RW et al (1999) Project to Intercompare Regional Climate Simulations (PIRCS): description and initial results. J Geophys Res 104:19443–19462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang JP, Su BK, Zhao M et al (2004) Long term climate change numerical simulation in east Asia. Acta Meteorol Sin (in Chinese) 62(6):752–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Z, Wang SY, Zeng ZM, Fu CB (2003) Analysis of simulated heavy rain over the Yangtze river valley during 11–30 June 1998 using RIEMS. Adv Atmos Sci 20:815–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun WT, Stefanova L, Krishnamurti TN (2003) Improvement of the multimodel superensemble technique for seasonal forecasts. J Clim 16:3834–3840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun WT, Stefanova L, Mitra AK et al (2005) A Multi-model Superensemble algorithm for seasonal climate prediction using DEMETER forecasts. Tellus 57A:280–289

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Program for Developing Basic Sciences of China (2009CB723904) and the General Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40975048). We thank all participants of RMIP for their efforts in conducting the model simulations and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinming Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feng, J., Lee, DK., Fu, C. et al. Comparison of four ensemble methods combining regional climate simulations over Asia. Meteorol Atmos Phys 111, 41–53 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-010-0115-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-010-0115-7

Keywords

Navigation