Summary
The goal of the present study is to investigate the variability of simulated convective precipitation by three convection-resolving models using different set-ups and initial and boundary conditions. The COSMO, MM5 and WRF models have been used to simulate the atmospheric situation on 12 July 2006, when local convection occurred in central Europe under weak synoptic forcing. The focus of this investigation is on the convective precipitation in the northern Black Forest in South-West Germany. The precipitation fields from the nine model simulations differ considerably. Six simulations capture the convective character of the event. However, they differ considerably in the location and timing of the intense convective cells. Only one model simulation captures the early onset of precipitation; in all other simulations, the onset of convective precipitation is delayed by up to five hours. All model simulations significantly underpredict the amount of surface precipitation compared to gauge-adjusted radar observations. The simulated diurnal cycles show maximum CAPE and minimum CIN values in the early afternoon. The different onset times of precipitation in the model simulations are shifted in accordance to the simulated diurnal cycles of CAPE and CIN. In the simulations with an early onset of precipitation maximum CAPE and minimum CIN values also appear early. The amount of simulated precipitation, however, does not correlate with CAPE or CIN.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aoshima F, Behrendt A, Bauer H-S, Wulfmeyer V (2008) Statistics of convection initiation by use of Meteosat Rapid Scanning Data during the Convective and Orographically-Induced Precipitation Study (COPS). Meteorol Z (submitted)
M Didone D Lüthi HC Davies (2007) ArticleTitleSome factors in the design of a regional prediction model: an examination based upon two MAP events Meteorol Z 16 261–273 Occurrence Handle10.1127/0941-2948/2007/0202
U Finke T Hauf (1996) ArticleTitleThe characteristics of lightning occurence in Southern Germany Beitr Phys Atmos 69 361–374
Grell G, Dudhia J, Stauffer D (1995) A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech Notes 398+STR, NCAR, Boulder, CO
Groenemeijer P, Barthlott Ch, Behrendt A, Corsmeier U, Handwerker J, Kohler M, Kottmeier Ch, Mahlke H, Pal S, Radlach M, Trentmann J, Wieser A, Wulfmeyer V (2008) Multisensor measurements of a convective storm cluster over a low mountain range: adaptive observations during PRINCE. Mon Wea Rev (submitted)
Grzeschik M, Bauer H-S, Wulfmeyer V, Engelbart D, Wandinger U, Mattis I, Althausen D, Engelmann R, Tesche M, Riede A (2008) Four-dimensional variational analysis of water-vapor Raman lidar data and their impact on mesoscale forecasts. J Atmos Oceanic Technol (in press)
C Hohenegger D Lüthi C Schär (2006) ArticleTitlePredictability mysteries in cloud-resolving models Mon Wea Rev 134 2095–2107 Occurrence Handle10.1175/MWR3176.1
C Keil GC Craig (2007) ArticleTitleA displacement-based error measure applied in a regional ensemble forecasting system Mon Wea Rev 135 3248–3259 Occurrence Handle10.1175/MWR3457.1
Keil C, Leuenberger D, Craig GC (2007) Radar rainfall assimilation and short-range QPF in a high-resolution EPS, Extended abstract, ICAM 2007
D Leuenberger A Rossa (2007) ArticleTitleRevisiting the latent heat nudging scheme for the rainfall assimilation of a simulated convective storm Meteorol Atmos Phys 98 195–215 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00703-007-0260-9
F Molteni R Buizza C Marsigli A Montani F Nerozzi T Paccagnella (2001) ArticleTitleA strategy for high-resolution ensemble prediction. Part I: Definition of representative members and global-model experiments Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 127 2069–2094 Occurrence Handle10.1002/qj.49712757612
Schättler U, Doms G, Schraff C (2005) A description of the nonhydrostatic regional model LM, Part VII: User’s guide. Consortium for Small-Scale Modelling
Schwitalla T, Bauer H-S, Wulfmeyer V, Zängl G (2008) Systematic errors of QPF in low-mountain regions. Meteorol Z (submitted)
Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG (2005) A description of the advanced research WRF Version V2, NCAR/TN-486/STR, Boulder, CO, USA
J Steppeler G Doms U Schättler HW Bitzer A Gassmann U Damrath G Gregoric (2003) ArticleTitleMeso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydrostatic model LM Meteorol Atmos Phys 82 75–96 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00703-001-0592-9
Wernli H, Paulat M, Hagen M, Frei C (2008) SAL – a novel quality measure for the verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts. Mon Wea Rev (in press)
V Wulfmeyer H-S Bauer M Grzeschik A Behrendt F Vandenberghe EV Browell S Ismail RA Ferrare (2006) ArticleTitleFour-dimensional variational assimilation of water vapor differential absorption lidar data: the first case study within IHOP_2002 Mon Wea Rev 134 209–230 Occurrence Handle10.1175/MWR3070.1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Correspondence: Jörg Trentmann, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Trentmann, J., Keil, C., Salzmann, M. et al. Multi-model simulations of a convective situation in low-mountain terrain in central Europe. Meteorol Atmos Phys 103, 95–103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-008-0323-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-008-0323-6