Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics

, Volume 96, Issue 1–2, pp 21–28 | Cite as

Decay of the Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex and the occurrence of cut-off low systems: An exploratory study

  • L. Gimeno
  • R. Nieto
  • R. M. Trigo
Article

Summary

The authors perform an exploratory analysis on the effect of the timing of the stratospheric vortex breakup in the occurrence of cut-off low systems (COLs) in the Northern Hemisphere. The first multidecadal Northern Hemisphere COLs database (Nieto et al, 2005) covering a 41 year-long period (1958–1998) was used in the analysis. The dates of stratospheric vortex breakup were obtained using two different approaches recently purposed in literature based in potential vorticity and zonal winds. An analysis of differences of COLs occurrences for the five earlier (later) breakup years showed that, at latitudes lower than 45° N, COLs are more frequent for earlier vortex years during the following spring and summer. The monthly analysis showed that, in general, the significant differences start in May lasting until September, being especially relevant for the European sector, the area with the highest rates of COLs occurrence in the Northern Hemisphere.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black, RX, McDaniel, BA, Robinson, WA 2006Stratosphere-troposphere coupling during spring onsetJ Climate1948914901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cayan, DR, Kammerdiener, SA, Dettinger, MD, Caprio, JM, Peterson, DH 2001Changes in the onset of spring in the western United StatesBull Am Met Soc82399415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haynes, PH 2005Stratospheric dynamicsAnn Rev Fluid Mech37263293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Holton, J, Haynes, P, McIntyre, M, Douglas, A, Rood, R, Pfister, L 1995Stratosphere-troposphere exchangeRev Geophys33403439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Karpetchko, A, Kyro, E, Knudsen, BM 2005Arctic and Antarctic polar vortices 1957–2002 as seen from the ERA-40 reanalysisJ Geophys Res110D21109DOI:10.1029/2005JD006113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kentarchos, AS, Roelofs, GJ, Lelieveld, J, Cuevas, E 2000On the origin of elevated surface ozone concentration at Izaña observatory during the last days of March 1996: A model studyGeophys Res Lett2736993702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knudsen, BM, Andersen, SB 2001Longitudinal variation in springtime ozone trendsNature413699700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knudsen, BM, Lahoz, WA, O’Neill, A, Morcrette, JJ 1998Evidence for a substantial role for dilution in northern mid-latitude ozone depletionGeophys Res Lett2545014504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nash, ER, Newman, PA, Rosenfield, JE, Schoeberl, M 1996An objective determination of the polar vortex using Ertel’s potential vorticityJ Geophys Res10194719478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Newman, PA, Nash, ER, Rosenfield, JE 2001What controls the temperature of the Arctic stratosphere during the spring?J Geophys Res1061999920010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nieto, R, Gimeno, L, de la Torre, L, Ribera, P, Gallego, D, García-Herrera, R, García, JA, Nuñez, M, Redaño, A, Lorente, J 2005Climatological features of cut-off low systems in the Northern HemisphereJ Climate1828052823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Palmén E, Newton CW (1969) Atmospheric circulation systems: their structure and physical interpretation. Academic Press, 603 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Porcù, F, Caracciolo, C, Prodi, F 2003Cloud systems leading to flood events in Europe: an overview and classificationMeteor Appl10217228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Price, JD, Vaughan, G 1992Statistical studies of cut off-low systemsAnn Geophys1096102Google Scholar
  15. Tripoli, GJ, Medaglia, CM, Dietrich, SM, Mugnai, A, Panegrossi, G, Pinori, S, Smith, EA 2005The 9–10 November 2001 Algerian flood: A numerical studyBull Am Met Soc8612291235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang, XJ, Key, JR 2003Recent trends in arctic surface, cloud, and radiation properties from spaceScience29917251728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Waugh, DW, Randel, WJ 1999Climatology of arctic and Antarctic polar vortices using elliptical diagnosisJ Atmos Sci5615941613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Waugh, DW, Rong, PP 2002Interannual variability in the decay of lower stratospheric arctic vorticesJ Meteor Soc Japan809971012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Winkler R and coauthors (2005) Manual of synoptic satellite meteorology: Conceptual models, vers. 5.3 [Available from Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Hohe Warte 38, 1190 Vienna, Austria.]Google Scholar
  20. Zhou, ST, Gelman, ME, Miller, AJ, McCormack, JP 2000An inter-hemisphere comparison of the persistent stratospheric polar vortexGeophys Res Lett2711231126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Gimeno
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Nieto
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. M. Trigo
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Física Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias de OurenseUniversidad de VigoOurenseSpain
  2. 2.University of Lisbon, CGUL, IDLLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Departamento de EngenheriasUniversidade LusófonaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations