Skip to main content
Log in

Is the dual-task cost of walking and texting unique in people with multiple sclerosis?

  • Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Neural Transmission Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate cognitive-motor interference of walking while texting in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The study included 30 PwMS, mean disease duration 11.8 (SD = 6.8) years, and 15 healthy controls. The investigation included a cognitive assessment; texting assessment based on 100 typed characters; and gait assessment under two different conditions: normal walking and walking while texting. Outcome measures included the Symbol Digit Modalities Test to assess cognition. Texting measures included accuracy (%) and duration(s). Gait was assessed with axial accelerometers to quantify temporal measures. The dual-task cost percentage for the walking tests and texting accuracy was determined by calculating the percentage change from a single task to a double task. The impact of texting while walking on gait measures was significantly higher in PwMS; furthermore, texting was less accurate compared to the healthy controls. The dual-task cost for texting accuracy in the PwMS group was 153.3 (SD = 105.7) compared to 8.9 (SD = 26.6) in the healthy group. A significant association was found solely in the PwMS group between cognition and texting accuracy while in a sitting position (R2 = 0.564) and while walking (R2 = 0.534). The dual-task cost of walking and texting appears to be unique in the MS population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benedict RH, DeLuca J, Phillips G et al (2017) Validity of the symbol digit modalities test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 23:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak F, King L, Mancini M (2015) Role of body-worn movement monitor technology for balance and gait rehabilitation. Phys Ther 95:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalron A, Allali G (2017) Gait and cognitive impairments in multiple sclerosis: the specific contribution of falls and fear of falling. J Neural Transm 124:1407–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalron A, Dvir Z, Achiron A (2010) Walking while talking - difficulties incurred during the initial stages of multiple sclerosis disease process. Gait Posture 32:332–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasovsky T, Weiss PL, Kizony R (2017) A narrative review of texting as a visually-dependent cognitive-motor secondary task during locomotion. Gait Posture 52:354–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberg EM, Muratori LM (2015) Cell phones change the way we walk. Gait Posture 35:688–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learmonth YC, Ensari I, Motl RW (2017) Cognitive motor interference in multiple sclerosis: Insights from a systematic quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 98:1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone C, Patti F, Feys P (2015) Measuring the cost of cognitive-motor dual tasking during walking in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 21:123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim J, Amado A, Sheehan L, Van Emmerik R (2015) Dual task interference during walking: the effects of texting on situational awareness and gait stability. Gait Posture 42:466–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden M, Rainie L (2010) Adults and cell phone distractions. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, pp 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcay O, Grinberg Y, Berkowitz S, Hershkovitz L, Kalron A (2017) Cognitive-motor interference in multiple sclerosis: what happens when the gait speed is fixed? Gait Posture 57:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda PN, Verrall AM, Finlayson ML, Molton IR, Jensen MP (2015) Falls among adults aging with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96:464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar J, Hecht P, Wener R (2008) Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. Accid Anal Prev 40:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pau M, Corona F, Pilloni G, Porta M, Coghe G, Cocco E (2018) Texting while walking differently alters gait patterns in people with multiple sclerosis and healthy individuals. Mult Scler Relat Disord 19:129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabrun SM, van den Hoorn W, Moorcroft A, Greenland C, Hodges PW (2014) Texting and walking: strategies for postural control and implications for safety. PLoS One 9:e84312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Kerns KA, Baldwin M (1997) The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 52:M232–M240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (2011) Americans and text messaging. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson AJ, Banwell B, Barkhof F et al (2018) Diagnostic of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018 17(2):162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Huang Y, He J, Wei K (2018) What affects gait performance during walking while texting? A comparison of motor, visual and cognitive factors. Ergonomics 16:1–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wajda DA, Motl RW, Sosnoff JJ (2013) Dual task cost of walking is related to fall risk in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 335:160–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alon Kalron.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sirhan, B., Frid, L. & Kalron, A. Is the dual-task cost of walking and texting unique in people with multiple sclerosis?. J Neural Transm 125, 1829–1835 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-018-1939-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-018-1939-4

Keywords

Navigation