Advertisement

Journal of Neural Transmission

, Volume 125, Issue 7, pp 1087–1097 | Cite as

Evaluation of artifact-corrected electroencephalographic (EEG) training: a pilot study

  • Jeffry P. La Marca
  • Daniel Cruz
  • Jennifer Fandino
  • Fabiana R. Cacciaguerra
  • Joseph J. Fresco
  • Austin T. Guerra
Psychiatry and Preclinical Psychiatric Studies - Original Article

Abstract

This double-blind study examined the effect of electromyographical (EMG) artifacts, which contaminate electroencephalographical (EEG) signals, by comparing artifact-corrected (AC) and non-artifact-corrected (NAC) neurofeedback (NF) training procedures. 14 unmedicated college students were randomly assigned to two groups: AC (n = 7) or NAC (n = 7). Both groups received 12 sessions of NF and were trained using identical NF treatment protocols to reduce their theta/beta power ratios (TBPR). Outcomes on a continuous performance test revealed that the AC group had statistically significant increases across measures of auditory and visual attention. The NAC group showed smaller gains that only reached statistical significance on measures of visual attention. Only the AC group reduced their TBPR, the NAC group did not. AC NF appears to play an important role during training that leads to improvements in both auditory and visual attention. Additional research is required to confirm the results of this study.

Keywords

Attention deficit Artifact Continuous performance test EEG biofeedback EMG Neurofeedback 

References

  1. Adler LA, Kessler RC, Spencer T (2003) Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale-V1.1 (ASRS-V1.1) Symptoms Checklist. World Health Organization, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics (2011) ADHD: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 128(5):1007–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arns M, de Ridder S, Strehl U, Breteler M, Coenen A (2009) Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: the effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: a meta-analysis. Clin EEG Neurosci 40(3):180–189.  https://doi.org/10.1177/155005940904000311 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arns M, Conners CK, Kraemer HC (2013) A decade of EEG theta/beta ratio research in ADHD: a meta-analysis. J Atten Disord 17(5):374–383.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712460087 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arns M, Heinrich H, Strehl U (2014) Evaluation of neurofeedback in ADHD: the long and winding road. Biol Psychol 95:108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentivoglio AR, Bressman SB, Cassetta E, Carretta D, Tonali P, Albanese A (1997) Analysis of blink rate patterns in normal subjects. Mov Disord 12(6):1028–1034.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.870120629 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bresnahan SM, Barry RJ (2002) Specificity of quantitative EEG analysis in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 112(2):133–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunner D, Vasko R, Detka C, Monahan J, Reynolds C III, Kupfer D (1996) Muscle artifacts in the sleep EEG: automated detection and effect on all-night EEG power spectra. J Sleep Res 5(3):155–164.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2869.1996.00009.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunner P, Bianchi L, Guger C, Cincotti F, Schalk G (2011) Current trends in hardware and software for brain–computer interfaces (BCIs). J Neural Eng 8:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025001 Google Scholar
  10. Bush G, Frazier JA, Rauch SL, Seidman LJ, Whalen PJ, Jenike MA, Rosen BR, Biederman J (1999) Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the Counting Stroop. Biol Psychiatry 45(12):1542–1552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  12. De Luca CJ (2002) Surface electromyography: detection and recording. DelSys IncorporatedGoogle Scholar
  13. Demos J (2005) Getting started with neurofeedback. WW Norton and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Fulton BD, Scheffler RM, Hinshaw SP, Levine P, Stone S, Brown TT, Modrek S (2009) National variation of ADHD diagnostic prevalence and medication use: health care providers and education policies. Psychiatr Serv 60(8):1075–1083CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gloss D, Varma JK, Pringsheim T, Nuwer MR (2016) Practice advisory: the utility of EEG theta/beta power ratio in ADHD diagnosis: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 87(22):2375–2379.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003265 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Goncharova II, McFarland DJ, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR (2003) EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1580–1593.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00093-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammond DC, Walker J, Hoffman D, Lubar JF, Trudeau D, Gurnee R, Horvat J (2004) Standards for the use of quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) in neurofeedback: a position paper of the International Society for Neuronal Regulation. J Neurother 8(1):5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jasper HH, Solomon P, Bradley C (1938) Electroencephalographic analyses of behavior problem children. Am J Psychiatry 95(3):641–658.  https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.95.3.641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaiser DA, Sterman MB (2000) Automatic artifact detection, overlapping windows, and state transitions. J Neurother 4(3):85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kessler RC, Adler L, Ames M, Demler O, Faraone S, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Jin R, Secnik K, Spencer T (2005) The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychol Med 35(02):245–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kessler RC, Adler LA, Gruber MJ, Sarawate CA, Spencer T, Van Brunt DL (2007) Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Screener in a representative sample of health plan members. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 16(2):52–65.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.208 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. La Marca JP (2018) Historical overview of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and neurofeedback: implications for academic achievement, assessment, and intervention in schools. Contemp Sch Psychol 22(1):1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0155-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. La Marca JP, O’Connor RE (2016) Neurofeedback as an intervention to improve reading achievement in students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, inattentive subtype. NeuroRegulation 3(2):55–77.  https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.3.2.55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakens D (2013) Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Linden M, Habib T, Radojevic V (1996) A controlled study of the effects of EEG biofeedback on cognition and behavior of children with attention deficit disorder and learning disabilities. Biofeedback Self-regulation 21(1):35–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214148 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lofthouse N, Arnold LE, Hersch S, Hurt E, DeBeus R (2012) A review of neurofeedback treatment for pediatric ADHD. J Atten Disord 16(5):351–372.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054711427530 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Loo SK, Barkley RA (2005) Clinical utility of EEG in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Appl Neuropsychol 12(2):64–76.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an1202_2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. St. Louis E, Frey LE (eds) (2016) Electroencephalography (EEG): an introductory text and atlas of normal and abnormal findings in adults, children, and infants. American Epilepsy Society, Chicago.  https://doi.org/10.5698/978-0-9979756-0-4
  29. Lubar JF (1991) Discourse on the development of EEG diagnostics and biofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Biofeedback Self-Regulation 16(3):201–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01000016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lubar JF, Lubar JO (1999) Neurofeedback assessment and treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders. In: Evans J, Abarbanel A (eds) Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 103–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lubar JF, Shouse MN (1976) EEG and behavioral changes in a hyperkinetic child concurrent with training of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR). Biofeedback Self-Regulation 1(3):293–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01001170 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lubar JF, Swartwood MO, Swartwood JN, Timmermann DL (1995) Quantitative EEG and auditory event-related potentials in the evaluation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: effects of methylphenidate and implications for neurofeedback training. J Psychoeduc Assess 98:143–160Google Scholar
  33. Maddux CD (2010) Review of the IVA + Plus: integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test. In: Spies RA, Carlson JF, Geisinger KF (eds) The eighteenth mental measurements yearbook. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, Lincoln, pp 434–437Google Scholar
  34. Monastra VJ, Lubar JF, Linden M, VanDeusen P, Green G, Wing W, Phillips A, Fenger TN (1999) Assessing attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via quantitative electroencephalography: an initial validation study. Neuropsychology 13(3):424–433.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.13.3.424 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Monastra VJ, Lynn S, Linden M, Lubar JF, Gruzelier J, La Vaque TJ (2005) Electroencephalographic biofeedback in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 30(2):95–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-005-4305-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Montgomery DD (2001) Change: detection and modification. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 26(3):215–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rossiter T, La Vaque TJ (1995) A comparison of EEG biofeedback and psychostimulants in treating attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders. J Neurother 1(1):48–59.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J184v01n01_07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sandford JA (2015) SmartMind-3. BrainTrain Inc, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  39. Sandford JA, Sandford SE (2014) Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA-2). BrainTrain Inc, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  40. Sandford JA, Sandford SE (2017) BrainTrain IVA-2 Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test Manual. BrainTrain Inc, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  41. Sawilowsky SS (2009) New effect size rules of thumb. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 8(2):597–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sime W (2010) Review of the IVA + Plus: Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test. In: Spies RA, Carlson JF, Geisinger KF (eds) The eighteenth mental measurements yearbook. Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, Lincoln, pp 437–439Google Scholar
  43. Snyder SM, Quintana H, Sexson SB, Knott P, Haque A, Reynolds DA (2008) Blinded, multi-center validation of EEG and rating scales in identifying ADHD within a clinical sample. Psychiatry Res 3(159):346–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thompson L, Thompson M (1998) Neurofeedback combined with training in metacognitive strategies: effectiveness in students with ADD. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 23(4):243–263.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022213731956 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tinius TP (2003) The Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test as a neuropsychological measure. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 18(5):199–214.  https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/18.5.439 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. van Boxtel A (2001) Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface EMG activity of facial, jaw, oral, and neck muscles. Psychophysiology 38(1):22–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Weber E, Köberl A, Frank S, Doppelmayr M (2011) Predicting successful learning of SMR neurofeedback in healthy participants: methodological considerations. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 36(1):37–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-010-9142-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seton Hall UniversitySouth OrangeUSA
  2. 2.Rutgers UniversityNewarkUSA
  3. 3.Palo Alto UniversityPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations