Journal of Neural Transmission

, Volume 122, Issue 3, pp 375–391 | Cite as

The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values

  • David Tomé
  • Fernando Barbosa
  • Kamila Nowak
  • João Marques-Teixeira
Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Review Article


Auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) are widely used in diverse fields of today’s neuroscience, concerning auditory processing, speech perception, language acquisition, neurodevelopment, attention and cognition in normal aging, gender, developmental, neurologic and psychiatric disorders. However, its transposition to clinical practice has remained minimal. Mainly due to scarce literature on normative data across age, wide spectrum of results, variety of auditory stimuli used and to different neuropsychological meanings of AERPs components between authors. One of the most prominent AERP components studied in last decades was N1, which reflects auditory detection and discrimination. Subsequently, N2 indicates attention allocation and phonological analysis. The simultaneous analysis of N1 and N2 elicited by feasible novelty experimental paradigms, such as auditory oddball, seems an objective method to assess central auditory processing. The aim of this systematic review was to bring forward normative values for auditory oddball N1 and N2 components across age. EBSCO, PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar were systematically searched for studies that elicited N1 and/or N2 by auditory oddball paradigm. A total of 2,764 papers were initially identified in the database, of which 19 resulted from hand search and additional references, between 1988 and 2013, last 25 years. A final total of 68 studies met the eligibility criteria with a total of 2,406 participants from control groups for N1 (age range 6.6–85 years; mean 34.42) and 1,507 for N2 (age range 9–85 years; mean 36.13). Polynomial regression analysis revealed that N1 latency decreases with aging at Fz and Cz, N1 amplitude at Cz decreases from childhood to adolescence and stabilizes after 30–40 years and at Fz the decrement finishes by 60 years and highly increases after this age. Regarding N2, latency did not covary with age but amplitude showed a significant decrement for both Cz and Fz. Results suggested reliable normative values for Cz and Fz electrode locations; however, changes in brain development and components topography over age should be considered in clinical practice.


Event-related potentials Auditory oddball paradigm N1 wave N2 wave Aging Normative values 


Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of this study. The contribution of Kamila Nowak was supported by NCBR grant No. INNOTECH-K1/IN1/30/159041/NCBR/12


  1. Akaho R (1996) The effects of antiepileptic drugs on cognition in normal volunteers. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 50:60–61Google Scholar
  2. Altieri N (2013) Neural dynamics of audiovisual integration for speech and non-speech stimuli: a psychophysical study. Open Neurosci J 7:5–18Google Scholar
  3. Amenedo E, Díaz F (1998) Aging-related changes in processing of non-target and target stimuli during an auditory oddball task. Biol Psychol 48:235–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderer P, Semlitsch HV, Saletu B (1996) Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 99:458–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderer P, Pascual-Marqui RD, Semlitsch HV, Saletu B (1998a) Differential effects of normal aging on sources of standard N1, target N1 and target P300 auditory event-related brain potentials revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 108:160–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderer P, Pascual-Marqui RD, Semlitsch HV, Saletu B (1998b) Electrical sources of P300 event-related brain potentials revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography. 1. Effect of normal aging. Neuropsychobiology 37:20–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baltes PB, Lindenberger U (1997) Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychol Aging 12(1):12–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett G, Neshige R, Shibasaki H (1987) Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 66:409–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barry RJ, Kirkaikul S, Hodder D (2000) EEG alpha activity and the ERP to target stimuli in an auditory oddball paradigm. Int J Psychophysiol 39:39–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barry RJ, de Pascalis V, Hodder D, Clarke AR, Johnstone SJ (2003) Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval auditory oddball task, and their effects on ERP components. Int J Psychophysiol 47:187–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR, Croft RJ, Lawrence CA (2004) Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval auditory oddball task, and their effects on ERP components. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2593–2601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Smith JL, Clarke AR, Croft RJ (2006) Dynamics of narrow-band EEG phase effects in the passive auditory oddball task. Eur J Neurosci 24:291–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bennett M, Hacker P (2007) Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. In: Bennett M, Dennett D, Hacker P, Searle J (eds) Neuroscience and philosophy: brain, mind and language, 1st edn. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 3–49Google Scholar
  14. Bentin S, Carmon A (1984) Verbal information processing and hemispheric AEP asymmetry. Ann N Y Acad Sci 425:166–170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Berger H (1929) Uber das Elektrenkephalogramm das menchen. Archiv fur Psychiatrie 87:527–570Google Scholar
  16. Bertoli S, Probst R (2005) Lack of standard N2 in elderly participants indicates inhibitory processing deficit. NeuroReport 16(17):1933–1937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bortoletto M, Tona G, Scozzari S, Sarasso S, Stegagno L (2011) Effects of sleep deprivation on auditory change detection: a N1-Mismatch Negativity study. Int J Psychophysiol 81:312–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Boucher O, Bastien C, Saint-Amour D, Dewailly E, Ayotte P, Jacobson J et al (2010) Prenatal exposure to methylmercury and PCBs affects distinct stages of information processing: an event-related potential study with Inuit children. Neurotoxicology 31:373–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Brigham J, Moss HB, Murrelle EL, Kirisci L, Spinelli JS (1997) Event-related potential negative shift in sons of polysubstance- and alcohol-use disorder fathers. Psych Res 73:133–146Google Scholar
  20. Brown WS, Marsh JT, La Rue A (1983) Exponential electrophysiological aging: P300 latency. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:277–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown KJ, Gonsalvez CJ, Harris AWF, Williams LM, Gordon E (2002) Target and non-target ERP disturbances in first episode vs. chronic schizophrenia. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1754–1763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown CR, Clarke AR, Barry RJ (2006) Inter-modal attention: ERPs to auditory targets in an inter-modal oddball task. Int J Psychophysiol 62:77–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bruneau N, Roux S, Guérin P, Barthélémy C, Lelord G (1997) Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4–8 year-old children. Psychophysiology 34:32–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cahn B, Polich J (2009) Meditation (Vipassana) and the P3a event-related brain potential. Int J Psychophysiol 72:51–60PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cansino S, Williamson SJ, Karron D (1994) Tonotopic organization of human auditory association cortex. Brain Res 663:38–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Čeponienė R, Rinne T, Näätänen R (2002) Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 108:870–882Google Scholar
  27. Čeponienė R, Lepistö T, Alku P, Aro H, Näätänen R (2003) Event-related potential indices of auditory vowel processing in 3-year-old children. Clin Neurophysiol 114:652–661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Čeponienė R, Westerfield M, Torki M, Townsend J (2008) Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Res 1215:53–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Chao LL, Knight RT (1997a) Age-related prefrontal alterations during auditory memory. Neurobiol Aging 18(1):87–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chao LL, Knight RT (1997b) Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging. Cereb Cortex 7(1):63–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chao LL, Lindgren JA, Flenniken DL, Weiner WW (2004) ERP evidence of impaired central nervous system function in virally suppressed HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1583–1591PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chunhau P, Shimono M, Iwanaga M, Hasegawa R, Honda Y, Shirahata A et al (2005) Analysis of P3 in a continuous 40-min auditory oddball task. Int Cong Series 1278:105–108Google Scholar
  33. Cohen HL, Ji J, Chorlian DB, Begleiter H, Porjesz B (2002) Alcohol-related ERP changes recorded from different modalities: a topographic analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 26(3):303–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Courchesne E (1990) Chronology of postnatal human brain development: event-related potential, positron emission tomography, myelinogenesis, and synaptogenesis studies. In: Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson R (eds) Event-related brain potentials: basic issues and applications. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 210–241Google Scholar
  35. Crowley KE, Colrain IM (2004) A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin Neurophysiol 115:732–744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dassanayake T, Gawarammana IB, Weerasinghe V, Dissanayake PS, Pragaash S, Dawson A, Senanayake N (2009) Auditory event-related potential changes in chronic occupational exposure to organophosphate pesticides. Clin Neurophysiol 120:1693–1698PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Davis PA (1939) Effects of acoustic stimuli on the waking human brain. J Neurophysiology 2:494–499Google Scholar
  38. Davis H, Zerlin S (1966) Acoustic relations of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am 39:109–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Demiralp T, Yordanova J, Kolev V, Ademoglu A, Devrim M, Samar VJ (1999) Time-frequency analysis of single-sweep event-related potentials by means of fast wavelet transform. Brain Lang 66:129–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Dixit A, Vaney N, Tandon OP (2006) Evaluation of cognitive brain functions in caffeine users: a P3 evoked potential study. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 50(2):175–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Donchin E (1981) Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!. Surprise? Psychophysiology 18:493–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Duncan C, Barry R, Connolly J, Fischer C, Michie P, Näätänen R et al (2009) Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin Neurophysiol 120:1883–1908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dustman RE, Emmerson RY, Shearer DE (1996) Life span changes in electrophysiological measures of inhibition. Brain Cogn 30(1):109–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Eggermont JJ (1988) On the rate of maturation of sensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 70(4):293–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebech J, Saermark K (1980) Magnetic auditory responses from the human brain. A preliminary report. Scand Audiol 9:185–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Enoki H, Sanada S, Yoshinaga H, Oka E, Ohtahara S (1993) The effects of age on the N200 component of the auditory event-related potentials. Cogn Brain Res 1:161–167Google Scholar
  47. Eysenck MW, Keane MT (2003) (eds) Cognitive psychology: a student’s handbook, 4th edn. Psychology Press, East Sussex, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  48. Fabiani M, Gratton G, Federmeier (2007) Event-related brain potentials: methods, theory, and applications. In: Cacioppo J, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (eds) The Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 94–119Google Scholar
  49. Ford JM, Pfefferbaum A (1991) Event-related potentials and eyeblink responses in automatic and controlled processing: effects of age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78:361–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ford JM, Mathalon DH, Kalba S, Marsh L, Pfefferbaum A (2001) N1 and P300 abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia, epilepsy, and epilepsy with schizophrenia like features. Biol Psychiatry 49:848–860PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Friedman D, Simpson GV, Hamberger M (1993) Age-related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. Psychophysiology 30:383–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Friedman D, Kazmerski V, Fabiani M (1997) An overview of age-related changes in the scalp distribution of P3b. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 104:498–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Gandelman-Marton R, Theitler J, Klein C, Rabey JM (2010) The effects of immediate and short-term retest on the latencies and amplitudes of the auditory event-related potentials in healthy adults. J Neurosci Methods 186:77–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Gilley PM, Sharma A, Dorman M, Martin K (2005) Developmental changes in refractoriness of the cortical auditory evoked potential. Clin Neurophysiol 116:646–657Google Scholar
  55. Gilmore CS, Clementz BA, Buckley PF (2005) Stimulus sequence affects schizophrenia–normal differences in event processing during an auditory oddball task. Cogn Brain Res 24:215–227Google Scholar
  56. Gilmore CS, Clementz BA, Berg P (2009) Hemispheric differences in auditory oddball responses during monaural versus binaural stimulation. Int J Psychophysiol 73:326–333PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Gölgeli A, Süer C, Özesmi Ç, Dolu N, Aşcioğ lu M, Şahin Ö (1999) The effect of sex differences in young adults on event-related potentials. Int J Neurosci 99:69–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Gonsalvez CJ, Gordon E, Grayson S, Barry RJ, Lazzaro I, Bahramali H (1999) Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude? Psychophysiology 36:643–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Goodin DS, Squires KC, Henderson BH, Starr A (1978) Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44:447–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Guney F, Genc B, Kutlu R, Ilhan B (2009) Auditory P300 event-related potential in tobacco smokers. J Clin Neurosci 16:1311–1315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Haig AR, Rennie C, Gordon E (1997) The use of Gaussian component modelling to elucidate average ERP component overlap in schizophrenia. J Psychophysiol 11:173–187Google Scholar
  62. Hamm JP, Ethridge LE, Shapiro JR, Pearlson GD, Tamminga CA, Sweeney JA, Keshavan MS, Thaker GK, Clementz BA (2013) Family history of psychosis moderates early auditory cortical response abnormalities in non-psychotic bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 15:774–786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Hari R, Aittoniemi K, Järvinen M-L, Katila T, Varpula T (1980) Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Localization of neural generators. Exp Brain Res 40:237–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Hasher L, Zacks RT (1988) Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and new view. In: Bower GH (ed) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 193–225Google Scholar
  65. Hegerl U, Gaebel W, Gutzman H, Ulrich G (1988) Auditory evoked potentials as possible predictors of outcome in schizophrenic outpatients. Int J Psychophysiol 6:207–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Henkin Y, Kishon-Rabin L, Gadoth N, Pratt H (2002) Auditory event-related potentials during phonetic and semantic processing in children. Audiol Neurootol 7:228–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Hillyard SA, Kutas M (1983) Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Ann Rev Psychol 34:33–61Google Scholar
  68. Hillyard SA, Hink RF, Schwent VL, Picton TW (1973) Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182:177–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Hirata K, Katayama S, Yamazaki K, Fujikane M, Katayama K (1996) Electric field distribution of event-related potentials in stroke patients. Brain Topogr 8(3):279–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Ho M-C, Chou C-Y, Huang C-F, Lin Y-T, Shih C-S, Han S-Y, Shen M-H et al (2012) Age-related changes of task-specific brain activity in normal aging. Neurosci Lett 507:78–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Huttenlocher PR (1979) Synaptic density in human frontal cortex—developmental changes and effects of aging. Brain Res 163(2):195–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Inui K, Okamoto H, Miki K, Gunji A, Kakigi R (2006) Serial and parallel processing in the human auditory cortex: a magnetoencephalographic study. Cereb Cortex 16:18–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Iragui VJ, Kutas M, Mitchiner MR, Hillyard SA (1993) Effects of aging on event-related brain potentials and reaction times in an auditory oddball task. Psychophysiology 30:10–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Jääskeläinen IP (2012) Introduction to cognitive neuroscience. Ventus Publishing ApS, Denmark, pp 92–112. Google Scholar
  75. Jääskeläinen IP, Ahveninen J, Bonmassar G, Dale AM, Ilmoniemi RJ, Levänen S et al (2004) Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness. Proc Nat Acad Sci (USA) 101:6809–6814Google Scholar
  76. Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, Anderson JW, Coyle SF (1996) Age-related changes in child and adolescent event-related potential component morphology, amplitude and latency to standard and target stimuli in an auditory oddball task. Int J Psychophysiol 24:223–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, Anderson JW (2001) Topographic distribution and developmental timecourse of auditory event-related potentials in two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Int J Psychophysiol 42:73–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Kazis A, Kimiskidis V, Georgiadis G, Kapinas K (1996) Cognitive event-related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in myotonic dystrophy. Neurophysiol Clin 26:75–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Kok A (1999) Varieties of inhibition: manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging. Acta Psychol (Amst) 101(2–3):129–158Google Scholar
  80. Kreukels BPC, Hamburger HL, de Ruiter MB, van Dam FS, Ridderinkhof KR, Boogerd W, Schagen SB (2008) ERP amplitude and latency in breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Neurophysiol 119:533–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Ladish C, Polich J (1989) P300 and probability in children. J Exp Child Psychol 48:212–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Lembreghts M, Crasson M, EL Ahmadi A, Timsit-Berthier M (1995) Éude de la variabilité interindividuelle des potentiels évoqués auditifs exogènes et endogènes en condition d’attention volontaire. Neurophysiol Clin 25:203–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Liasis A, Bamiou DE, Boyd S, Towell A (2006) Evidence for a neurophysiologic auditory deficit in children with benign epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes. J Neural Transm 113:939–949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Lucchesi L, Pompéia S, Manzano G, Kohn A, Galduroz J, Bueno O, Tufik T (2003) Flunitrazepam-induced changes in neurophysiological, behavioural, and subjective measures used to assess sedation. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 27:525–533Google Scholar
  85. Martin BA, Tremblay KL, Korczak P (2008) Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic. Ear Hear 29:285–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. May P, Tiitinen H (2010) Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47:66–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. McGee T, Kraus N, Nicol T (1997) Is it really a mismatch negativity? An assessment of methods for determining response validity in individual subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 104:359–368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Mueller V, Brehmer Y, von Oertzen T, Li S-C, Lindenberger U (2008) Electrophysiological correlates of selective attention: a lifespan comparison. BMC Neurosci 9:18PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Mulert C, Jäger L, Schmitt R, Bussfeld P, Pogarell O, Möller H-J et al (2004) Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection. Neuroimage 22:83–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Murray MM, Brunet D, Michel CM (2008) Topographic ERP analyses: a step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Top 20(4):249–264Google Scholar
  92. Näätänen R (1975) Selective attention and evoked potentials in humans—a critical review. Biol Psychol 2:237–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Näätänen R (1982) Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull 92:605–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Näätänen R, Picton T (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Näätänen R, Gaillard AWK, Mäntysalo S (1978) Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Amst) 42:313–329Google Scholar
  96. Näätänen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, Alho K (2007) The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol 118:2544–2590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Neuhaus AH, Popescu FC, Rentzsch J, Gallinat J (2013) Critical evaluation of auditory event-related potential deficits in schizophrenia: evidence from large-scale single-subject pattern classification. Schizophr Bull doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt151
  98. Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA (2009) Pre-attentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training. Ear Hear 30:43–46Google Scholar
  99. Novak GP, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr, Wiznitzer ML (1990) Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:255–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Novak GP, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr (1992) Mismatch detection and the latency of temporal judgements. Psychophysiology 29:399–411Google Scholar
  101. Ogawa T, Tanaka H, Hirata K (2009) Cognitive deficits in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis evaluated by event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 120:659–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Pantev C, Bertrand O, Eulitz C, Verkindt C, Hampson S, Schuierer G et al (1995) Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 94:26–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Papanicolaou AC, Baumann S, Rogers RL, Saydjari C, Amparo EG, Eisenberg HM (1990) Localization of auditory response sources using magnetoencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 47:33–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D (1994) Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 18:49–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Peters A (2002) Structural changes in the normally aging cerebral cortex of primates. Prog Brain Res 136:455–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Picton TW, Stuss DT, Champagne SC, Nelson RF (1984) The effects of age on human event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 21:312–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Polich J (2007) Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118:2128–2148PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Ponton CW, Moore JK, Eggermont JJ (1999) Prolonged deafness limits auditory system developmental plasticity: evidence from evoked potentials study in children with cochlear implants. Scand Audiol Suppl 51:13–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B, Don M (2000) Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 111:220–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Potts G, Hirayasu Y, O’Donnell B, Shenton M, McCarley R (1998a) High-density recording and topographic analysis of the auditory oddball event-related potential in patients with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 44:982–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Potts G, Dien J, Hartry-Speiser A, McDougal L, Tucker D (1998b) Dense sensor array topography of the event-related potential to task-relevant auditory stimuli. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 106:444–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Rance G, Cone-Wesson B, Wunderlich J, Dowell R (2002) Speech perception and cortical event related potentials in children with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear 23:239–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. Raz N, Gunning FM, Head D, Dupuis JH, McQuain J, Briggs SD et al (1997) Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: differential vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter. Cereb Cortex 7(3):268–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Reinvang I, Nordby H, Nielsen CS (2000) Information processing deficits in head injury assessed with ERPs reflecting early and late processing stages. Neuropsychologia 38:995–1005PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Ritter W, Vaughan HG (1969) Averaged evoked responses in vigilance and discrimination: a reassessment. Science 164:326–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan H, Friedman D (1979) A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. Science 203:1358–1361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Rosburg T, Boutros NN, Ford JM (2008) Reduced auditory evoked potential component N100 in schizophrenia—a critical review. Psychiatry Res 161:259–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Sakamoto K, Nakata H, Kakigi R (2009) The effect of mastication on human cognitive processing: a study using event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 120:41–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Sams M, Paavilainen P, Alho K, Näätänen R (1985) Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62:437–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Schneider A, Leigh MJ, Adams P, Nanakul R, Chechi T, Olichney J, Hagerman R, Hessl D (2013) Electrocortical changes associated with minocycline treatment in fragile X syndrome. J Psychopharmacol 27(10):956–963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Segalowitz S, Bernstein D, Lawson S (2001) P300 event-related potential decrements in well-functioning university students with mild head injury. Brain Cogn 45:342–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee TJ, Nicol TG (1997) Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 104:540–545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Shelley A-M, Silipo G, Javitt D (1999) Diminished responsiveness of ERPs in schizophrenic subjects to changes in auditory stimulation parameters: implications for theories of cortical dysfunction. Schizophr Res 37:65–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Siedenberg R, Goodin DS, Aminoff MJ, Rowley HA, Roberts TPL (1996) Comparison of late components in simultaneously recorded event-related electrical potentials and event-related magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 99:191–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Squires NK, Squires KC, Hillyard SA (1975) Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 38(4):387–401PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Sumi N, Nan’no H, Fujimoto O, Ohta Y, Takeda M (2000) Interpeak latency of auditory event-related potentials (P300) in senile depression and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 54(6):679–684PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Tanaka H, Arai M, Harada M, Hozumi A, Hirata K (2012) Cognition and event-related potentials in adult-onset non-demented myotonic dystrophy type 1. Clin Neurophysiol 123:261–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Tarter R, Blackson T, Brigham J, Moss H, Caprara G (1995) The association between childhood irritability and liability to substance use in early adolescence: a 2-year follow-up study of boys at risk for substance abuse. Drug Alcohol Depend 39:253–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Tiitinen H, May P, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R (1994) Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 372:90–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Tomé D, Marques-Teixeira J, Barbosa F (2012) Temporal lobe epilepsy in childhood—a study model of auditory processing. J Neurol Neurophysiol 3(2). doi: 10.4172/2155-9562.1000123
  131. Toscano J, McMurray B, Dennhardt J, Luck S (2010) Continuous perception and graded categorization: electrophysiological evidence for a linear relationship between the acoustic signal and perceptual encoding of speech. Psychological Sci 21(10):1532–1540Google Scholar
  132. Tremblay KL, Piskosz M, Souza P (2003) Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues. Clin Neurophysiol 114(7):1332–1343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Tsai M-L, Hung K-L, Tung W, Chiang T-R (2012) Age-changed normative auditory event-related potential value in children in Taiwan. J Form Med Assoc 111:245–252Google Scholar
  134. Ullsperger P, Freude G, Erdmann U (2001) Auditory probe sensitivity to mental workload changes—an event-related potential study. Int J Psychophysiol 40:201–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Valkonen-Korhonen M, Purhonena M, Tarkka I, Sipilä P, Partanen J, Karhu J et al (2003) Altered auditory processing in acutely psychotic never-medicated first-episode patients. Cogn Brain Res 17:747–758Google Scholar
  136. van Dinteren R, Arns M, Jongsma MLA, Kessels RPC (2014) P300 development across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(2):e87347PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. van Harten B, Laman DM, van Duijn H, Knol DL, Stam CJ, Scheltens P, Weinstein HC (2006) The auditory oddball paradigm in patients with vascular cognitive impairment: a prolonged latency of the N2 complex. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 21:322–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Verma N, Nichols C, Greiffenstein M, Singh R, Hurst-Gordon D (1989) Waves earlier than P3 are more informative in putative subcortical dementias: a study with mapping and neuropsychological techniques. Brain Topogr 1(3):183–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Wang W, Wang Y-H (2001) Sensation seeking correlates of passive auditory P3 to a single stimulus. Neuropsychologia 39:1188–1193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Wang W, Datta H, Sussman E (2005) The development of the length of the temporal window of integration for rapidly presented auditory information as indexed by MMN. Clin Neurophysiol 116:1695–1706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. West RL (1996) An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychol Bull 120:272–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Wetzel N, Widmann A, Schröger E (2011) Processing of novel identifiability and duration in children and adults. Biol Psychol 86:39–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Whelan R, Lonergan R, Kiiski H, Nolan H, Kinsella K, Bramham J, O’Brien M et al (2010) A high-density ERP study reveals latency, amplitude, and topographical differences in multiple sclerosis patients versus controls. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1420–1426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Winkler I (2007) Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J Psychophysiol 21(3–4):147–163Google Scholar
  145. Winter O, Kok A, Kenemans J, Elton M (1995) Auditory event-related potentials to deviant stimuli during drowsiness and stage 2 sleep. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 96:398–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Wise V, McFarlane AC, Clark CR, Battersby M (2009) Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder. Int J Psychophysiol 74:34–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Wolpaw JR, Penry JK (1975) A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalogr clin Neurophysiol 39(6):609–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Woods DL, Alho K, Algazi A (1993) Intermodal selective attention: evidence for processing in tonotópica auditory fields. Psychophysiology 30:287–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Wright MJ, Geffen GM, Geffen LB (1996) ERP measures of stimulus processing during an auditory oddball task in Parkinson’s disease: evidence for an early information processing deficit. Parkinsonism Rel Disord 2(1):13–21Google Scholar
  150. Yamamoto T, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L, Nicholson C, Llinás R (1988) Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain. Proc Nat Acad Sci (USA) 85:8732–8736Google Scholar
  151. Yvert B, Crouzeix A, Bertrand O, Seither-Preisler A, Pantev C (2001) Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans. Cereb Cortex 11:411–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. Yvert B, Fischer C, Bertrand O, Pernier J (2005) Localization of human supratemporal auditory areas from intracerebral auditory evoked potentials using distributed source models. Neuroimage 28:140–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. Zheng Y, Zhao F, Liang M, Bardsley B, Yang H, Zhang Z (2011) Toward an understanding of auditory evoked cortical event-related potentials: characteristics and classification. Audiol Med 1–10. doi: 10.3109/1651386X.2010.537910
  154. Zhu W, Zhang J, Liu H, Ding X, Ma Y, Zhou C (2008) Differential cognitive responses to guqin music and piano music in Chinese subjects: an event-related potential study. Neurosci Bull 24(1):21–28PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Tomé
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fernando Barbosa
    • 2
  • Kamila Nowak
    • 3
  • João Marques-Teixeira
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Audiology, School of Allied Health SciencesPolytechnic Institute of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Laboratory of NeuropsychologyNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations