Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pupillary responses to intranasal trigeminal and olfactory stimulation

  • Basic Neurosciences, Genetics and Immunology - Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Neural Transmission Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether pupillary responses to odorous stimuli reflect their intensity or hedonic tone. A total of 21 healthy subjects participated in the study. Using a computer-controlled olfactometer, subjects received intranasal stimuli including odors of rose (PEA; 2 concentrations), lemon and rotten eggs, plus the trigeminal irritant CO2 (also at two concentrations). Changes in the pupil diameter were obtained ipsilaterally to the side of stimulus presentation. Both trigeminal and olfactory stimulation produced an increase in pupillary diameter. Latencies for pupillary reaction were fastest for the higher concentration of CO2 and slowest after the presentation of PEA at the low concentration. Response amplitudes were largest in response to stimulation with CO2 at the high concentration, while they were smallest in response to odorous stimulation with PEA. Response latencies decreased with increasing stimulus intensity. No such correlation was found for hedonic ratings and pupillary reactions. Thus, the change in the pupillary diameter indicates differences between stimulus modalities and stimulus strength, but not pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaoui-Ismaïli O, Vernet-Maury E, Dittmar A, Delhomme G, Chanel J (1997a) Odor hedonics: connection with emotional response estimated by autonomic parameters. Chem Senses 22:237–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alaoui-Ismaïli O, Robin O, Rada H, Dittmar A, Vernet-Maury E (1997b) Basic emotions evoked by odorants: comparison between autonomic responses and self-evaluation. Physiol Behav 62:713–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badia P, Harsh J, Balkin T, O’Rourke D, Burton S (1985) Behavioral control of respiration in sleep and sleepiness to signal-induced sleep fragmentation. Psychophysiology 22:517–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barkat S, Thomas-Danguin T, Bensafi M, Rouby C, Sicard G (2003) Odor and color of cosmetic products: correlations between subjective judgement and autonomous nervous system response. Int J Cosmet Sci 25(6):273–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty J, Lucero-Wagoner B (2000) The pupillary system. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology. University Press, Cambridge, pp 142–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennaroch EE (2001) Pain-autonomic interactions: a selective review. Clin Auton Res 11:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensafi M, Rouby C, Farget V, Bertrand B, Vigouroux M, Holley A (2002) Autonomic nervous system responses to odours: the role of pleasantness and arousal. Chem Senses 27(8):703–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley MM, Miccoli L, Escrig MA, Lang PJ (2008) The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology 45(4):602–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braüchli P, Rüegg PB, Etzweiler F, Zeier H (1995) Electrocortical and autonomic alteration by administration of a pleasant and an unpleasant odor. Chem Senses 20:505–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton AR, Birznieks I, Bolton PS, Henderson LA, Macefield VG (2009) Effects of deep and superficial experimentally induced acute pain on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in human subjects. J Physiol 587:183–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CR, Oka S, Bradshaw DH, Jacobson RC, Donaldson GW (1999) Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation in normal volunteers: relationship to brain-evoked potentials and pain report. Psychophysiology 36(1):44–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Brugger WE, Jurs PC, Orndorff MA, Snyder PJ, Lowry LD (1978) Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol Behav 20(2):175–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL, Deems DA, Frye RE, Pelberg R, Shapiro A (1988) Olfactory sensitivity, nasal resistance, and autonomic function in patients with multiple chemical sensitivities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114(12):1422–1427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grunberger J, Linzmayer L, Grunberger M, Saletu B (1993) Pupillometry in clinical psychophysiological studies. Methodology and proposals for applications in psychiatry. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 29:100–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks RA, Williams SL, Ferrante F (1979) Pupillary attributions of college students to happy and angry faces. Percept Mot Skills 48:401–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Kobal G (2001) Olfactory event-related potentials. In: Simon SA, Nicolelis MAL (eds) Methods and frontiers in chemosensory research. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 429–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Konnerth CG, Rosenheim K, Kobal G (2001) Screening of olfactory function with a four-minute odor identification test: reliability, normative data, and investigations in patients with olfactory loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:976–981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Graham JE, Malarkey WB, Porter K, Lemeshow S, Glaser R (2008) Olfactory influences on mood and autonomic, endocrine, and immune function. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33(3):328–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobal G (1985) Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation. Pain 22:151–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T (1942) Pain. McMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida H (1971) Significance of pupillometry in otorhinolaryngology. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 74:1631–1652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oka S, Chapman CR, Jacobson RC (2000) Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation: effect of conduction distance, sex, and age. J Psychophysiol 14(2):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes. Oxford University Press, London, p 430

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin LS, Graham D, Pasker R, Calhoun W (1985) Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in common migraine. Headache J Head Face Pain 25(1):40–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt H, Lötsch J (2007) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the miotic effects of dihydrocodeine in humans. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 63:1045–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sneppe R, Gonay P (1973) Evaluation objective, quantitative et qualitative de l’olfaction. Electrodiagn Ther 10:5–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tassorelli C, Micieli G, Osipova V, Rossi F, Nappi G (1995) Pupillary and cardiovascular responses to the cold-pressor test. J Auton Nerv Syst 55(1–2):45–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uryvaev YV, Zverev YP (1993) The perception of an odogen is proportional to the activity of the autonomous nervous system in man. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova 43(6):1075–1079

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winneke G (1992) Structure and determinants of psychophysiological response to odorant/irritant air pollution. Ann NY Acad Sci 641:261–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LL, Niemann CU, Larson MD (2003) Mechanism of pupillary reflex dilation in awake volunteers and in organ donors. Anesthesiology 99(6):1281–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, University of Dresden Medical School, Dresden, Germany

    Christine B. Schneider & Tjalf Ziemssen

  2. Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Benno Schuster, Han-Seok Seo, Antje Haehner & Thomas Hummel

  3. Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Christine B. Schneider

Authors
  1. Christine B. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tjalf Ziemssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benno Schuster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Han-Seok Seo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Antje Haehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas Hummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Hummel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, C.B., Ziemssen, T., Schuster, B. et al. Pupillary responses to intranasal trigeminal and olfactory stimulation. J Neural Transm 116, 885–889 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-009-0244-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-009-0244-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation