Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraoperative prevention of nasal mucosal injury and surgical field contamination during single-nostril transnasal endoscopic pituitary adenomas resection

  • How I Do it
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The common complications of transnasal endoscopic pituitary adenomas resection include nasal hemorrhage, olfactory disorder, nasal adhesion, and intracranial infection. Consequently, the protection of nasal mucosa and the prevention of surgical field contamination are critical.

Method

We presented a step-by-step description of the methods of the disinfection and protection of nasal mucosa and the prevention of surgical field contamination during transnasal endoscopic pituitary adenomas resection, and these comprehensive measures to prevent these complications have not been documented.

Conclusion

These measures effectively reduce the risk of nasal mucosal injury and surgical field contamination, and are easy to perform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data and material generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The code used in this article is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. McKean EL, Bellile E, Akbar NA, Abuzeid WM (2019) Antibiotic prophylaxis in anterior skull-base surgery: a survey of the North American Skull Base Society. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 9(10):1196–1204. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moldovan ID, Agbi C, Kilty S, Alkherayf F (2019) A systematic review of prophylactic antibiotic use in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary. World Neurosurg 128:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ceraudo M, Prior A, Balestrino A, Anania P, Camera M, Fiaschi P, Gatto F, Riccardi N, Zona G, Criminelli Rossi D (2021) Ultra-short antibiotic prophylaxis guided by preoperative microbiological nasal swabs in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163(2):369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04560-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hendricks BL, Shikary TA, Zimmer LA (2016) Causes for 30-day readmission following transsphenoidal surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154(2):359–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815617130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishioka H, Ohno S, Ikeda Y, Ohashi T, Haraoka J (2007) Delayed massive epistaxis following endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 149(5):523–6; discussion 526–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-007-1134-0

  6. Chaaban MR, Chaudhry AL, Riley KO, Woodworth BA (2015) Objective assessment of olfaction after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 29(5):365–368. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zada G, Kelly DF, Cohan P, Wang C, Swerdloff R (2003) Endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas and other sellar lesions: an assessment of efficacy, safety, and patient impressions. J Neurosurg 98(2):350–358. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.2.0350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dusick JR, Esposito F, Mattozo CA, Chaloner C, McArthur DL, Kelly DF (2006) Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: the patient's perspective-survey results from 259 patients. Surg Neurol 65(4):332–41, discussion 341–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2005.12.010

Download references

Funding

It was funded by the Jining Key Research and Development Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in the surgical procedure. Bo Gao participated in the perioperative management; acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and drafted the manuscript. Bin Han assisted in data collection. Gengshi Gu provided critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Haitao Wang supervised the study and finalized the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitao Wang.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

The funders had no role in any aspect of the perioperative procedures; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of The Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University.

Consent to participate

All participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

1. Before performing nasal irrigation, it is imperative to meticulously remove any visible secretions within the bilateral nasal cavities using a suction device.

2. Initial nasal irrigation with 0.5% povidone-iodine solution is performed twice, which is very important for the disinfection of the nasal mucosa, taking care to maintain this step for 3 min.

3. The application of gelatin sponges soaked with povidone-iodine should be carried out after nasal irrigation to reduce the surgical field contamination by the sinuses and hidden corners of the turbinates.

4. The application of neurosurgical patty saturated with povidone-iodine should be performed after the preparation of the mucosal flap, in order to occlude the communication between the nasal cavity and the pharynx. Additionally, it also serves to disinfect the mucosal flap that is flipped towards the nasopharynx.

5. By applying gelatin sponge or neurosurgical patty soaked with povidone-iodine to occlude the opening of the sphenoid sinus on the contralateral side, it is possible to minimize surgical field contamination by the contralateral nasal cavity. There is no need to place the neurosurgical patty soaked with povidone-iodine in the contralateral nasopharynx.

6. After removal of the osseous layer enveloping the sella turcica, it is also very important to irrigate the nasal and sphenoid sinus cavities again with povidone-iodine solution and physiological saline.

7. The introduction of the soft sheath through the nostril into the nasal cavity, extending to the anterior region of the sphenoid sinus, plays a critical role in protecting the nasal mucosa and preventing contamination within the sphenoid sinus.

8. The procedure of tumor resection is consistently performed within the soft sheath, while caution is exercised to avoid introducing or removing surgical instruments through the contralateral nasal cavity.

9. The opportune moment for the extraction of the soft sheath is chosen prior to repositioning the mucosal flap, in order to protect the mucosa to the fullest extent and minimize contamination.

10. It is imperative to remove all pre-placed gelatin sponges and neurosurgical patties to ensure postoperative sinus patency and prevent adhesions.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 263352 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, B., Han, B., Gu, G. et al. Intraoperative prevention of nasal mucosal injury and surgical field contamination during single-nostril transnasal endoscopic pituitary adenomas resection. Acta Neurochir 166, 114 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-05993-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-05993-4

Keywords

Navigation