Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic-assisted single-position lateral for multilevel circumferential lumbar interbody fusion: how I do it

  • How I Do it
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with insertion of pedicle screws is a surgical procedure that has gained popularity in the last years, becoming an important tool in the armamentarium of spine surgeons. In recent years, there is a trend to complete both procedures in a single position, thus avoiding flipping the patient prone to insert the pedicle screws.

Methods

We describe a step-by-step workflow of the robotic-assisted technique for multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with posterior instrumentation. The surgical procedure is performed in a single lateral position. For access to L4–5 or L5–S1, an oblique abdominal incision is performed in the same position, and the desired disc space is approached through an oblique or anterior corridor in the retroperitoneal space.

Conclusion

Robotic-assisted single-position lateral for multilevel circumferential lumbar interbody fusion is a safe and effective procedure in patients where lumbar stabilization is required. This technique provides patients with a faster recovery and low risk of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and materials presented in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Buckland AJ, Ashayeri K, Leon C, Manning J, Eisen L, Medley M, Protopsaltis TS, Thomas JA (2021) Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion. Spine J 21(5):810–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummock MD, Vanni S, Levi AD, Yu Y, Wang MY (2011) An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 15(1):11–18. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.SPINE10374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farber SH, Walker CT, Uribe JS (2022) Anterior and anterolateral lumbar spine decompression and fusion: minimally invasive surgery approaches. In: Steinmetz MP, Berven SH, Benzel EC (eds) Benzel’s spine surgery techniques, complication avoidance, and management. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1146–1156

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guiroy A, Carazzo C, Camino-Willhuber G, Gagliardi M, Fernandes-Joaquim A, Cabrera JP, Menezes C, Asghar J (2021) Single-position surgery versus lateral-then-prone-position circumferential lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic literature review. World Neurosurg 151:e379–e386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ouchida J, Kanemura T, Satake K, Nakashima H, Ishikawa Y, Imagama S (2020) Simultaneous single-position lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using O-arm-based navigation reduces the occupancy time of the operating room. Eur Spine J 29(6):1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06388-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL (2010) Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 13(2):260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LAR: methodology, original draft, conceptualization, and writing. SS: methodology, writing, visualization, and review. TU: methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis A. Robles.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Miami and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

The patients consented to the publication of their case in this paper.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

1. Robotic-assisted single lateral position is an adequate option for multilevel circumferential lumbar interbody, especially when a shorter operative time is desired.

2. The anatomy of vascular structures and psoas muscle should be carefully studied before surgery. The presence of vascular structures hindering the access to the disc, or an anterior position of psoas muscle may indicate that a different approach is more suitable.

3. In cases of L4-5 disc surgery, the position of the iliac crest is analyzed to determine the suitability of a lateral approach at that level.

4. In cases of scoliosis, it is important to study the characteristics of the curve to plan the lateral approach and orientation of the pedicle screws insertion.

5. Because more personnel and equipment are necessary to perform both surgeries, the operating room setup must be adequately organized to allow surgeons to work comfortably.

6. Patient is firmly immobilized and fixed to the table to prevent any movement during surgery. A gel roll is inserted in the waist to open the space between the rib cage and pelvis.

7. After prepping and draping the patient, the navigation frame is inserted in the iliac crest, then the O arm and the robotic system are used to establish the surgical plan. Pedicle screw size and trajectory should be selected in the robot before starting surgery.

8. Performing both surgical procedures simultaneously results in a shorter operative time and fewer complications.

9. If an interbody lumbar fusion at L5-S1 is required, it can be performed during the same lateral position by using a different anterolateral abdominal incision.

10. RASLPC is a low-risk and effective technique to perform circumferential stabilization. Single position lateral shows the same clinical outcome and local lordosis compared to two-stage surgery.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 209937 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robles, L.A., Shah, S. & Urakov, T. Robotic-assisted single-position lateral for multilevel circumferential lumbar interbody fusion: how I do it. Acta Neurochir 165, 3963–3967 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05874-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05874-2

Keywords

Navigation