Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in improving physical function and quality of life in trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and determine improvements in quality of life (QoL) and daily functional status.

Methods

Data from primary TN (pTN) patients treated with PBC from December 2018 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assessments were used to evaluate patients’ QoL and physical function every 6 months after surgery, and facial pain was evaluated every 3 to 6 months post-surgery.

Results

A total of 80 pTN patients were enrolled for analysis. The Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scores of I-II were achieved in 67 (83.8%) patients immediately after the surgery. The estimated rates of BNI I-II pain relief at one, two, and three years were 94.2%, 87.6%, and 83.2%, respectively. All aspects of the SF-36 questionnaire were significantly improved after the PBC, especially in terms of role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), and social functioning (SF). Patients’ functional outcomes measured by FIM at the 6-month follow-up examination were 108.6 ± 9.9, which was significantly improved compared with the pretreatment scores (90.8 ± 12.7). There was no difference between the severity of facial numbness in FIM and any item of the SF-36 except RP (P = 0.004) at 6 months after surgery. There was also no difference in SF-36 and FIM between patients with or without facial hyperalgesia.

Conclusions

PBC can produce long-term and stable pain relief and significantly improve the patient’s QoL and physical function. However, further well-designed, high-level, evidence-based studies are needed to precisely assess the efficacy of PBC for pTN patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions

Abbreviations

BNI:

Barrow Neurological Institute

TN:

trigeminal neuralgia

PBC:

percutaneous balloon compression

FO:

foramen ovale

MC:

Meckel’s cave

PTN:

primary trigeminal neuralgia

MRI:

magnetic resonance image

FIM:

functional independence measure score

References

  1. Abdennebi B, Mahfouf L, Nedjahi T (1997) Long-term results of percutaneous compression of the gasserian ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia (series of 200 patients). Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 68(1-4 Pt 1):190–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asplund P, Blomstedt P, Bergenheim AT (2016) Percutaneous balloon compression vs percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for the primary treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 78(3):421–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barker FG 2nd (2007) Quality of life and individual treatment choice in trigeminal neuralgia. Pain 131(3):234–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bendtsen L et al (2020) Advances in diagnosis, classification, pathophysiology, and management of trigeminal neuralgia. Lancet Neurol 19(9):784–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beloeil H et al (2013) Guidelines for regional anesthetic and analgesic techniques in the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 32(4):275–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bick SKB, Eskandar EN (2017) Surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Clin N Am 28(3):429–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM et al (1992) Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 305(6846):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown JA et al (1996) Axon and ganglion cell injury in rabbits after percutaneous trigeminal balloon compression. Neurosurgery 38(5):993–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown JA, Pilitsis JG (2005) Percutaneous balloon compression for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: results in 56 patients based on balloon compression pressure monitoring. Neurosurg Focus 18(5):E10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen JF, Tu PH, Lee ST (2011) Long-term follow-up of patients treated with percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia in Taiwan. World Neurosurg 76(6):586–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng JS et al (2014) A review of percutaneous treatments for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 10(Suppl 1):25–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cuschieri S (2019) The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth 13(Suppl 1):S31–s34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. D'Andrea A et al (2020) Functional Independence Measure score is associated with mortality in critically ill elderly patients admitted to an intermediate care unit. BMC Geriatr 20(1):334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Diana C et al (2021) Does the surgical intervention for trigeminal neuralgia refractory to pharmacotherapy improve quality-of-life? - a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 79(11):2227–2239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haviv Y et al (2017) The impact of chronic orofacial pain on daily life: the vulnerable patient and disruptive pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 123(1):58–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kourilsky A et al (2022) Multivariate models to predict pain recurrence and sensitive complications after percutaneous balloon compression in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg:1–10

  17. Little AS et al (2008) Long-term pain response and quality of life in patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 63(5):915–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li MW, Jiang XF, Niu CS (2021) Efficacy of and risk factors for percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia in elderly patients. Br J Neurosurg 35(3):280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luo Y et al (2019) A research on quality of life score (QOLS) of patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). J Infect Public Health 12(5):690–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu MX et al (2021) Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with “microvascular decompression plus” technique. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 82(Suppl 3):e295–e299

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lv W et al (2022) Factors that may affect recurrence of trigeminal neuralgia after percutaneous balloon compression. J Clin Neurosci 99:248–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mullan S, Lichtor T (1983) Percutaneous microcompression of the trigeminal ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 59(6):1007–1012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nascimento RFV, Pipek LZ, de Aguiar PHP (2023) Is percutaneous balloon compression better than microvascular decompression to treat trigeminal neuralgia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 109:11–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nurmikko TJ (2017) Toward an etiology-based management of trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Manag 7(3):149–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Otsu Y et al (2023) Effects of microvascular decompression on pain relief and quality of life in late elderly patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)

  26. Sterman-Neto H et al (2021) Balloon compression vs radiofrequency for primary trigeminal neuralgia: a randomized, controlled trial. Pain 162(3):919–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spatz AL, Zakrzewska JM, Kay EJ (2007) Decision analysis of medical and surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia: how patient evaluations of benefits and risks affect the utility of treatment decisions. Pain 131(3):302–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Symonds T et al (2018) Measuring the impact of trigeminal neuralgia pain: the Penn Facial Pain Scale-Revised. J Pain Res 11:1067–1073

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. The International Classification of Headache Disorders (2013) 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 33(9):629–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Torres A (2018) Capturing Functional Independence Measure (FIM(R)) ratings. Rehabil Nurs 43(1):3–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang H et al (2022) Clinical analysis of the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia by percutaneous balloon compression. Front Surg 9:843982

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yadav YR et al (2017) Trigeminal neuralgia. Asian J Neurosurg 12(4):585–597

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ying X et al (2017) Long-term outcome of percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia patients elder than 80 years: a STROBE-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(39):e8199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zakrzewska JM, Linskey ME (2014) Trigeminal neuralgia. BMJ. Clin Evid:2014

  35. Zhao H et al (2018) Outcomes of two-isocenter gamma knife radiosurgery for patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia: pain response and quality of life. World Neurosurg 109:e531–e538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yaqiong Yu or Xiaohong Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Comments

The authors of this article analyzed the size of the trigeminal nerve root in a series of patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and discovered a higher likelihood of successful pain relief with percutaneous balloon compression in those who exhibited asymmetry between the affected and unaffected sides.

It remains unclear if the observed correlation has anything to do with the underlying mechanism of pain or the specific way the balloon compression produces long-lasting pain relief in TN patients. It is conceivable that nerve asymmetry is the reason TN patients develop pain in the first place, but the asymmetry may also be a result of prolonged nerve malfunction in TN patients when the nerve atrophies due to vascular compression or subsequent focal demyelination.

I applaud the authors for their thorough analysis of their clinical series but feel that it would be too early to make any recommendations in terms of choice of treatment approach or its technical details based on preoperative nerve morphometry.

Konstantin Slavin,

Chicago, USA

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, P., Liu, H., Liu, Z. et al. Effectiveness of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in improving physical function and quality of life in trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study. Acta Neurochir 165, 3905–3912 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05823-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05823-z

Keywords

Navigation