Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biportal endoscopic discectomy versus tubular microscopic discectomy for treating single-level lumbar disc herniation in obese patients: a multicenter, retrospective analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In microscopic lumbar discectomy in obese patients, a correlation is found between the operation time and increase in estimated blood loss according to the increase in body mass index; however, no studies have investigated the outcomes of biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in obese patients. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of microscopic and endoscopic discectomy in obese patients with lumbar herniated discs.

Methods

In this multicenter, retrospective study, clinical and radiological data were compared and analyzed in 73 obese patients with a body mass index of > 30 kg/m2 who underwent microscopic or biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Clinical data on the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) scores were measured, and radiological data were obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results

This study enrolled 43 patients who underwent microscopic discectomy and 30 who underwent biportal endoscopic discectomy. The VAS, ODI, and EQ-5D scores in both groups improved after surgery compared with those before surgery, although there was no difference between the two groups. Although there was a difference in the incidence of recurrent disc herniation confirmed by MRI after surgery, no difference was found in the number of patients requiring surgery between the two groups.

Conclusion

In obese patients with lumbar disc herniation that was not improved with conservative treatment, no significant clinical or radiological differences in outcomes were noted between microscopic and biportal endoscopic surgery methods. In contrast, minor complications were less common in the biportal group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Abdallah DY, Jadaan MM, McCabe JP (2013) Body mass index and risk of surgical site infection following spine surgery: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 22:2800–2809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2890-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn DK, Kim YH, Ko YR, Jang SJ, Jung JS (2023) The influence of systolic blood pressure at the time of extubation on the development of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma. Clin Orthop Surg 15:265–271. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios22297

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson GB (1999) Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 354:581–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andreshak TG, An HS, Hall J, Stein B (1997) Lumbar spine surgery in the obese patient. J Spinal Disord 10:376–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D (2003) Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Casimiro M (2017) Short-term outcome comparison between full-endoscopic interlaminar approach and open minimally invasive microsurgical technique for treatment of lumbar disc herniation. World Neurosurg 108:894–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi JY, Park SM, Kim HJ, Yeom JS (2022) Recent updates on minimally invasive spine surgery: techniques, technologies, and indications. Asian Spine J 16:1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0436

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Apovian CM (2016) Obesity: definition, comorbidities, causes, and burden. Am J Manag Care 22:s176-185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flamme CH (2005) Obesity and low back pain–biology, biomechanics and epidemiology. Orthopade 34:652–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-005-0817-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gepstein R, Shabat S, Arinzon ZH, Berner Y, Catz A, Folman Y (2004) Does obesity affect the results of lumbar decompressive spinal surgery in the elderly? Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:138–144. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000141901.23322.98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta S, Marathe N, Chhabra HS, Destandau J (2021) Long-Term Functional Outcomes of Endoscopic Decompression with Destandau Technique for Lumbar Canal Stenosis. Asian Spine J 15:431–440. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park SM, Park J, Jang HS, Heo YW, Han H, Kim HJ, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS (2020) Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J 20:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang J, Teng Y, Fan Z, Khan S, Xia Y (2014) Does obesity affect the surgical outcome and complication rates of spinal surgery? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:968–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3346-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Junjie L, Jiheng Y, Jun L, Haixiong L, Haifeng Y (2023) Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopy decompression and microscopic decompression effectiveness in lumbar spinal stenosis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Spine J 17:418–430. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Katsevman GA, Daffner SD, Brandmeir NJ, Emery SE, France JC, Sedney CL (2020) Complexities of spine surgery in obese patient populations: a narrative review. Spine J 20:501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim CH, Chung CK, Park CS, Choi B, Kim MJ, Park BJ (2013) Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:581–590. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318274f9a7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Madsbu MA, Oie LR, Salvesen O, Vangen-Lonne V, Nygaard OP, Solberg TK, Gulati S (2018) Lumbar microdiscectomy in obese patients: a multicenter observational study. World Neurosurg 110:e1004–e1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirtz TA, Greene L (2005) Is obesity a risk factor for low back pain? An example of using the evidence to answer a clinical question. Chiropr Osteopat 13:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-13-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Park HJ, Choi JY, You KH, Kang MS, Lee WM, Hyun JT, Park SM (2022) Clinical and radiologic outcomes of biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in obese patients: a retrospective case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:1117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06082-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Park SM, Lee HJ, Park HJ, Choi JY, Kwon O, Lee S, Kim HJ, Yeom JS (2023) Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for lumbar herniated disc: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J 23:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rihn JA, Kurd M, Hilibrand AS, Lurie J, Zhao W, Albert T, Weinstein J (2013) The influence of obesity on the outcome of treatment of lumbar disc herniation: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01558

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberti F, Arsenault KL (2021) Minimally invasive tubular laminectomies in multilevel spine surgery-an illustrative case-based review of techniques and combined approaches. J Spine Surg 7:83–99. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-635

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruan W, Feng F, Liu Z, Xie J, Cai L, Ping A (2016) Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 31:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma A, Shakya A, Singh V, Deepak P, Mangale N, Jaiswal A, Marathe N (2021) Incidence of dural tears in open versus minimally invasive spine surgery: a single-center prospective study. Asian Spine J 16(4):463. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith EJ, Inkrott BP, Kim CY, Du JY, Ahn UM, Ahn NU (2020) The effect of obesity on revision discectomy after singlelevel lumbar discectomy. J Surg Orthop Adv 29:10–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Staartjes VE, Siccoli A, de Wispelaere MP, Schroder ML (2019) Patient-reported outcomes unbiased by length of follow-up after lumbar degenerative spine surgery: do we need 2 years of follow-up? Spine J 19:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walid MS, Zaytseva N (2011) History of spine surgery in older obese patients. Ger Med Sci 9:Doc05. https://doi.org/10.3205/000128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. White AJ, Fiani B, Jarrah R, Momin AA, Rasouli J (2021) Surgical site infection prophylaxis and wound management in spine surgery. Asian Spine J. 16(3):451. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0674

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mixter WJ, Barr JS (1934) Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211(5):210–215. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM193408022110506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yao R, Zhou H, Choma TJ, Kwon BK, Street J (2018) Surgical site infection in spine surgery: who is at risk? Global Spine J 8:5S-30S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218799056

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoo MW, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2014) Does obesity make an influence on surgical outcomes following lumbar microdiscectomy? Korean J Spine 11:68–73. https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2014.11.2.68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.co.kr) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M. Park and H.J. Park contributed to the conception of the study. H.J. Park, S.M. Park, K.H. You, and J.Y. Choi wrote the manuscript. H.J. Kim and J.S. Yeom collected and analyzed data. M.S. Kang, J.Y. Hwang, and J.H. Kim reviewed the manuscript. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Min Park.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital (2022–07-001). Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 59235 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, JY., Park, HJ., Park, SM. et al. Biportal endoscopic discectomy versus tubular microscopic discectomy for treating single-level lumbar disc herniation in obese patients: a multicenter, retrospective analysis. Acta Neurochir 165, 2641–2650 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05686-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05686-4

Keywords

Navigation