Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The diagnostic utility of inspiratory-expiratory radiography for the assessment of phrenic nerve palsy associated with brachial plexus injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The phrenic nerve is commonly injured with trauma to the brachial plexus. Hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis may be well-compensated in healthy individuals at rest but can be associated with persistent exercise intolerance in some patients. This study aims to determine the diagnostic value of inspiratory-expiratory chest radiography compared to intraoperative stimulation of the phrenic nerve for assessing phrenic nerve injury associated with brachial plexus injury.

Methods

Over a 21-year period, the diagnostic utility of three-view inspiratory-expiratory chest radiography for identification of phrenic nerve injury was determined by comparison to intraoperative phrenic nerve stimulation. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of phrenic nerve injury and having an incorrect radiographic diagnosis.

Results

A total of 237 patients with inspiratory-expiratory chest radiography underwent intraoperative testing of phrenic nerve function. Phrenic nerve injury was present in approximately one-fourth of cases. Preoperative chest radiography had a sensitivity of 56%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive negative of 75%, and negative predictive value of 86% for identification of a phrenic nerve palsy. Only C5 avulsion was found to be a predictor of having an incorrect diagnosis of phrenic nerve injury on radiography.

Conclusion

While inspiratory-expiratory chest radiography has good specificity for detecting phrenic nerve injuries, a high number of false negatives suggest that it should not be relied upon for routine screening of dysfunction after traumatic brachial plexus injury. This is likely multifactorial and relates to variation in diaphragm shape and position, as well as limitations regarding static image interpretation of a dynamic process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to conditions of ethical approval but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bell D, Siriwardena A (2000) Phrenic nerve injury following blunt trauma. J Accid Emerg Med 17(6):419–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen ZY, Xu JG, Shen LY, Gu YD (2001) Phrenic nerve conduction study in patients with traumatic brachial plexus palsy. Muscle Nerve 24(10):1388–1390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chetta A, Rehman AK, Moxham J et al (2005) Chest radiography cannot predict diaphragm function. Respir Med 99:39–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chuang ML, Chuang DC, Lin IF, Vintch JR, Ker JJ, Tsao TC (2005) Ventilation and exercise performance after phrenic nerve and multiple intercostal nerve transfers for avulsed brachial plexus injury. Chest. 128(5):3434–3439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuieng-Yi LJ, An-Jou Lin J, Lee CS, Nai-Jen Chang T, Chwei-Chin CD (2022) Phrenic nerve as an alternative donor for nerve transfer to restore shoulder abduction in severe multiple root injuries of the adult brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Am

  6. Couto C, Pereira P, Moreira AC, Ribeiro V, Duarte J (2020) Bilateral isolated phrenic neuropathy: a rare cause of dyspnoea. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med 7(2):001258

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. FitzMaurice TS, McCann C, Nazareth DS, Walshaw MJ (2022) Characterisation of hemidiaphragm dysfunction using dynamic chest radiography: a pilot study. ERJ Open Res 8(1):00343–02021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Flores LP, Socolovsky M (2016) Phrenic nerve transfer for reconstruction of elbow extension in severe brachial plexus injuries. J Reconstr Microsurg 32(7):546–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Franko OI, Khalpey Z, Gates J (2008) Brachial plexus trauma: the morbidity of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Emerg Med J 25(9):614–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freedman B (1950) Unilateral paralysis of the diaphragm and larynx associated with inflammatory lung disease. Thorax 5(2):169–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson GJ (1989) Diaphragmatic paresis: pathophysiology, clinical features, and investigation. Thorax. 44(11):960–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Houston JG, Fleet M, Cowan MD, McMillan NC (1995) Comparison of ultrasound with fluoroscopy in the assessment of suspected hemidiaphragmatic movement abnormality. Clin Radiol 50(2):95–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang S, Xu WD, Shen YD, Xu JG, Gu YD (2011) An anatomical study of the full-length phrenic nerve and its blood supply: clinical implications for endoscopic dissection. Anat Sci Int 86(4):225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kharma N (2013) Dysfunction of the diaphragm: imaging as a diagnostic tool. Curr Opin Pulm Med 19(4):394–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khurram OU, Sieck GC, Mantilla CB (2017) Compensatory effects following unilateral diaphragm paralysis. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 246:39–46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lahrmann H, Grisold W, Authier FJ, Zifko UA (1999) Neuralgic amyotrophy with phrenic nerve involvement. Muscle Nerve 22(4):437–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lakranbi M, Harmouchi H, Belliraj L et al (2018) Phrenic paralysis after chest trauma: about 3 cases. J Nurs Healthcare Manage 1:105

    Google Scholar 

  18. Legarreta C, Brea Folco J, Burgos D, Arce S, Luna C (2018) Bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis after an unusual physical effort. Respir Med Case Rep 23:145–147

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lloyd T, Tang YM, Benson MD, King S (2006) Diaphragmatic paralysis: the use of M mode ultrasound for diagnosis in adults. Spinal Cord 44(8):505–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Loukas M, Kinsella CR Jr, Louis RG Jr, Gandhi S, Curry B (2006) Surgical anatomy of the accessory phrenic nerve. Ann Thorac Surg 82(5):1870–1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mak PH, Irwin MG, Ooi CG et al (2001) Incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis following supraclavicular brachial plexus block and its effect on pulmonary function. Anaesthesia 56(4):352–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCool FD, Tzelepis GE (2012) Dysfunction of the diaphragm. N Engl J Med 366(10):932–942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nason LK, Walker CM, McNeeley MF, Burivong W, Fligner CL, Godwin JD (2012) Imaging of the diaphragm: anatomy and function. Radiographics. 32(2):E51–E70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Neal JM, Moore JM, Kopacz DJ et al (1998) Quantitative analysis of respiratory, motor, and sensory function after supraclavicular block. Anesth Analg 86(6):1239–1244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Petrar SD, Seltenrich ME, Head SJ et al (2015) Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 40(2):133–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Richman PS, Yeung P, Bilfinger TV, Yang J, Stringer WW (2019) Exercise capacity in unilateral diaphragm paralysis: the effect of obesity. Pulm Med:1090982

  27. Sivashanmugam T, Maurya I, Kumar N, Karmakar MK (2019) Ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis after a supraclavicular and costoclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized observer blinded study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 36(10):787–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Suwatanapongched T, Gierada DS, Slone RM, Pilgram TK, Tuteur PG (2003) Variation in diaphragm position and shape in adults with normal pulmonary function. Chest 123(6):2019–2027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wynn-Williams N (1954) Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis and paresis of unknown aetiology without any marked rise in level. Thorax 9(4):299–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Institutional review board

Protocol #22-009551

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to study design and manuscript drafting. CSC contributed to data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Y. Shin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board as an exempt study (ID 22-009551).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crowe, C.S., Pulos, N., Spinner, R.J. et al. The diagnostic utility of inspiratory-expiratory radiography for the assessment of phrenic nerve palsy associated with brachial plexus injury. Acta Neurochir 165, 2589–2596 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05622-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05622-6

Keywords

Navigation