Abstract
Purpose
Due to the risk of intracranial aneurysm (IA) recurrence and the potential requirement for re-treatment following endovascular treatment (EVT), radiological follow-up of these aneurysms is necessary. There is little evidence to guide the duration and frequency of this follow-up. The aim of this study was to establish the current practice in neurosurgical units in the UK and Ireland.
Methods
A survey was designed with input from interventional neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons.
Neurovascular consultants in each of the 30 neurosurgical units providing a neurovascular service in the UK and Ireland were contacted and asked to respond to questions regarding the follow-up practice for IA treated with EVT in their department.
Results
Responses were obtained from 28/30 (94%) of departments. There was evidence of wide variations in the duration and frequency of follow-up, with a minimum follow-up duration for ruptured IA that varied from 18 months in 5/28 (18%) units to 5 years in 11/28 (39%) of units. Young patient age, previous subarachnoid haemorrhage and incomplete IA occlusion were cited as factors that would prompt more intensive surveillance, although larger and broad-necked IA were not followed-up more closely in the majority of departments.
Conclusions
There is a wide variation in the radiological follow-up of IA treated with EVT in the UK and Ireland. Further standardisation of this aspect of patient care is likely to be beneficial, but further evidence on the behaviour of IA following EVT is required in order to inform this process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernat A-L, Clarençon F, André A, Nouet A, Clémenceau S, Sourour N-A, Di Maria F, Degos V, Golmard J-L, Cornu P, Boch A-L (2017) Risk factors for angiographic recurrence after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes from a series of 178 unruptured aneurysms treated by regular coiling or surgery. J Neuroradiol 44:298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2017.05.003
Bradac O, Hide S, Mendelow DA, Benes V (2012) Aneurysm treatment in Europe 2010: an internet survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:971–978; discussion 977–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1340-2
Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, Summers PE, Kerr RS, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Rischmiller J, Byrne JV (2007) Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 38:1538–1544. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.106.466987
Fargen KM, Soriano-Baron HE, Rushing JT, Mack W, Mocco J, Albuquerque F, Ducruet AF, Mokin M, Linfante I, Wolfe SQ, Wilson JA, Hirsch JA (2018) A survey of intracranial aneurysm treatment practices among United States physicians. J NeuroInterv Surg 10:44–49. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012808
Ferns SP, Sprengers MES, Rooij WJV, Rinkel GJE, Rijn JCV, Bipat S, Sluzewski M, Majoie CBLM (2009) Coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 40:e523–e529. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099
Giordan E, Lanzino G, Rangel-Castilla L, Murad MH, Brinjikji W (2019) Risk of de novo aneurysm formation in patients with a prior diagnosis of ruptured or unruptured aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 131:14–24. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.1.Jns172450
Gupta R, Griessenauer CJ, Adeeb N, Chua MH, Moore JM, Patel AS, Thomas AJ, Ogilvy CS (2016) Evaluating imaging follow-up strategies and costs of unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular techniques: a survey of academic neurovascular centers in the United States. World Neurosurg 94:360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.030
Hall S, Abouharb A, Anderson I, Bacon A, Bahl A, Brydon H, Dow G, Fouyas I, Galea J, Ghosh A, Gurusinghe N, Kamel M, Minhas P, Mitchell P, Mowle D, Mukerji N, Nair R, Norris J, Patel H, Patel J, Patel K, St George J, Teo M, Toma A, Trivedi R, Uff C, Visca A, Walsh DC, White E, Whitfield P, Bulters D (2021) A survey of the radiological follow-up of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United Kingdom. Br J Neurosurg 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2021.1995587
Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Lawton MT, Duckwiler GR, Gress DR (2008) Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 39:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495747
Kemp WJ 3rd, Fulkerson DH, Payner TD, Leipzig TJ, Horner TG, Palmer EL, Cohen-Gadol AA (2013) Risk of hemorrhage from de novo cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 118:58–62. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.Jns111512
Lecler A, Raymond J, Rodriguez-Régent C, Al Shareef F, Trystram D, Godon-Hardy S, Ben Hassen W, Meder JF, Oppenheim C, Naggara ON (2015) Intracranial aneurysms recurrences more than 10 years after endovascular treatment-a prospective cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Radiology 277:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142496
Menke J, Schramm P, Sohns JM, Kallenberg K, Staab W (2014) Diagnosing flow residuals in coiled cerebral aneurysms by MR angiography: meta-analysis. J Neurol 261:655–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7053-5
Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67214-5
Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, Gobin YP, Jahan R, Frazee J, Martin N, Viñuela F (2003) Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience. J Neurosurg 98:959–966. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959
O’Kelly C, Macdonald RL (2008) Coiling and aneurysm rerupture: incomplete treatment is a causal intermediate not a confounder. Stroke 39:e121–e121. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.519561
Ries T, Siemonsen S, Thomalla G, Grzyska U, Zeumer H, Fiehler J (2007) Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy–prediction and outcome of retreatment. Am J Neuroradiol 28:1755. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0649
Sadato A, Hayakawa M, Adachi K, Nakahara I, Hirose Y (2016) Large residual volume, not low packing density, is the most influential risk factor for recanalization after coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. PLoS ONE 11:e0155062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155062
Soize S, Gawlitza M, Raoult H, Pierot L (2016) Imaging follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular means. Stroke 47:1407–1412. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011414
Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM, Albuquerque FC, Hills NK, Nakaji P, Karis JP, Wallace RC (2019) Ten-year analysis of saccular aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 132:771–776. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.8.Jns181846
Sweeney K, Silver N, Javadpour M (2016) Subarachnoid haemorrhage (spontaneous aneurysmal). BMJ Clin Evid 2016:1213
Toccaceli G, Diana F, Cagnazzo F, Cannizzaro D, Lanzino G, Barbagallo GMV, Certo F, Bortolotti C, Signorelli F, Peschillo S (2020) Microsurgical clipping compared with new and most advanced endovascular techniques in the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a meta-analysis in the modern era. World Neurosurg 137:451-464.e451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.118
van Amerongen MJ, Boogaarts HD, de Vries J, Verbeek AL, Meijer FJ, Prokop M, Bartels RH (2014) MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:1655–1661. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3700
van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M (2009) Opinion: imaging follow-up after coiling of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1646–1648. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1673
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was not required for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Vascular Neurosurgery – Aneurysm
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Fig. 1
(PNG 212 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hannan, C.J., Islim, A.I., Alalade, A.F. et al. Radiological follow-up of endovascularly treated intracranial aneurysms: a survey of current practice in the UK and Ireland. Acta Neurochir 165, 451–459 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05379-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05379-4