Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How I do it: management of M2 tear injury caused by drilling during intradural anterior clinoidectomy for microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms

  • How I Do it - Vascular Neurosurgery - Aneurysm
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

High-speed drilling is associated with potential injury to neurovascular structures, particularly during intradural drilling of the anterior clinoid process.

Method

During an anterior clinoidectomy, a cotton patty and middle cerebral artery branches became inadvertently wrapped around the bit, causing a tear on the inferior M2 trunk. Following temporary clipping of the internal carotid artery, the tear was identified. Temporary clips were placed proximally and distally. The tear was then repaired with interrupted microsutures.

Conclusion

Extreme care should be exercised during clinoidectomy. Should small vascular injury occur, direct microsuturing can be a good alternative to sacrificing or implantation anastomosis repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apuzzo MLJ (1993) Use and misuse of instruments. Brain surgery: Complication avoidance and management. Churchill Livingstone, New York Edinburgh London Melbourne Tokyo, pp 81–82

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dolenc V (1985) A combined epi- and subdural direct approach to carotid-ophthalmic artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 62(5):667–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dolenc V (1983) Direct microsurgical repair of intra- cavernous vascular lesions. J Neurosurg 58:824–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huynh-Le P, Natori Y, Sasaki T (2004) Surgical anatomy of the anterior clinoid process. J Clin Neurosci 11(3):283–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Korosue K, Heros RC (1992) “Subclinoid” carotid aneurysm with erosion of the anterior clinoid process and fatal intraoperative rupture. Neurosurgery 31(2):356–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhoton AL Jr (2002) The cavernous sinus, the cavernous venous plexus, and the carotid collar. Neurosurgery 51(4 Suppl):S375-410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spektor S, Dotan S, Mizrahi CJ (2013) Safety of drilling for clinoidectomy and optic canal unroofing in anterior skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 155(6):1017–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takahashi JA, Kawarazaki A, Hashimoto N (2004) Intradural en-bloc removal of the anterior clinoid process. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146(5):505–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasargil MG (1984). Carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms. In: Microneurosurgery. Stuttgart Georg Thieme, 1984, Vol II, pp 43–70.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Kemal Başkaya.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests. Senior Author (MKB) is a Stryker consultant.

Additional information

Key points

1. Drilling of the ACP is associated with a risk of injury to neurovascular structures even in experienced hands.

2. Many complications have been reported that are associated with drilling, including CSF leaks, optic nerve injury, oculomotor palsy, vascular injury, and both direct injury from the rotating tip of the drill and indirect thermal injury from the heating effect of the power drill.

3. In the paraclinoidal region, surgical exposure is hampered by the anterior clinoid process and drilling the ACP enhances the exposure.

4. Anterior clinoidectomies can be performed in extra- or intradural fashion.

5. Extreme care should be exercised during clinoidectomy, and normal vasculature should be carefully preserved.

6. Vascular injury is a drilling complication that can be catastrophic if not handled properly.

7. With skull base and cerebrovascular surgeries, the surgical team should be versatile and ready to perform salvaging procedures.

8. If a tear is small, direct microsuturing may be a good alternative to sacrificing or implantation of the artery.

9. Blood transfusion, adenosine and barbiturates should be readily available, and normovolemia and normotension should be maintained by the anesthesia team.

10. No matter how experienced the surgeon, the procedure should never be underestimated.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Vascular Neurosurgery – Aneurysm

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (M4V 102689 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keleş, A., Gürbüz, M.S., Erginoğlu, U. et al. How I do it: management of M2 tear injury caused by drilling during intradural anterior clinoidectomy for microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neurochir 164, 2541–2544 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05189-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05189-8

Keywords

Navigation