Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comment: Invasive tests for predicting shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus—the risk aspect

  • Letter to the Editor (by Invitation) - CSF Circulation
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Thavarajasingam SG, El-Khatib M, Rea M, Russo S, Lemcke J, Al-Nusair L, Vajkoczy P (2021) Clinical predictors of shunt response in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163:2641–2672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2010) Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 66(1):80–91. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000363408.69856.B8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eide PK (2011) Cardiac output in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: association with arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure wave amplitudes and outcome of shunt surgery. Fluids Barriers CNS 8(1)

  4. Eide PK, Brean A (2006) Intracranial pulse pressure amplitude levels determined during preoperative assessment of subjects with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 148(11):1151–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0896-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eide PK (2005) Intracranial pressure parameters in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 148(1):21–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-005-0654-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. (2010) Cerebral microdialysis and intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: association with clinical response to extended lumbar drainage and shunt surgery. J Neurosurg 112(2):414–424. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.5.JNS09122

  7. Eide PK, Park EH, Madsen J (2010) Arterial blood pressure vs intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 122(4):262–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01304.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eide PK, Brean A (2010) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitude during lumbar infusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus can predict response to shunting. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8454-7-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2016) Outcome of surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: role of preoperative static and pulsatile intracranial pressure. World neurosurgery 86:186-193e181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on CSF Circulation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thavarajasingam, S.G., El-Khatib, M. & Rea, M. Comment: Invasive tests for predicting shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus—the risk aspect. Acta Neurochir 164, 479–480 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05049-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05049-x

Navigation