Skip to main content
Log in

Stereotactic radiosurgery for clinoid meningiomas: a multi-institutional study

  • Original Article - Tumor - Meningioma
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Resection of clinoid meningiomas can be associated with significant morbidity. Experience with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for clinoid meningiomas remains limited. We studied the safety and effectiveness of SRS for clinoid meningiomas.

Methods

From twelve institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, we pooled patients treated with SRS for radiologically suspected or histologically confirmed WHO grade I clinoid meningiomas.

Results

Two hundred seven patients (median age: 56 years) underwent SRS for clinoid meningiomas. Median treatment volume was 8.02 cm3, and 87% of tumors were immediately adjacent to the optic apparatus. The median tumor prescription dose was 12 Gy, and the median maximal dose to the anterior optic apparatus was 8.5 Gy. During a median post-SRS imaging follow-up of 51.1 months, 7% of patients experienced tumor progression. Greater margin SRS dose (HR = 0.700, p = 0.007) and pre-SRS radiotherapy (HR = 0.004, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of better tumor control. During median visual follow-up of 48 months, visual function declined in 8% of patients. Pre-SRS visual deficit (HR = 2.938, p = 0.048) and maximal radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy (HR = 11.297, p = 0.02) independently predicted greater risk of post-SRS visual decline. Four patients experienced new post-SRS cranial nerve V neuropathy.

Conclusions

SRS allows durable control of clinoid meningiomas and visual preservation in the majority of patients. Greater radiosurgical prescription dose is associated with better tumor control. Radiation dose to the optic apparatus of ≥ 10 Gy and visual impairment before the SRS increase risk of visual deterioration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available upon request.

Code availability

N/A.

References

  1. Adler JR, Gibbs IC, Puataweepong P, Chang SD (2006) Visual field preservation after multisession cyberknife radiosurgery for perioptic lesions. Neurosurgery 59(2):244–254 (discussion 244-254)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akyoldaş G, Hergünsel ÖB, Yılmaz M, Şengöz M, Peker S (2020) Gamma Knife radiosurgery for anterior clinoid process meningiomas: a series of 61 consecutive patients. World Neurosurg 133:e529–e534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Mefty O (1990) Clinoidal meningiomas. J Neurosurg 73(6):840–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bassiouni H, Asgari S, Sandalcioglu IE, Seifert V, Stolke D, Marquardt G (2009) Anterior clinoidal meningiomas: functional outcome after microsurgical resection in a consecutive series of 106 patients: Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111(5):1078–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bunevicius A, Anand RK, Suleiman M et al (2021) Stereotactic radiosurgery for perioptic meningiomas: an international, multicenter study. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bunevicius A, Sheehan D, Lee Vance M, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP (2020) Outcomes of Cushing’s disease following Gamma Knife radiosurgery: effect of a center’s growing experience and era of treatment. J Neurosurg 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.JNS192743

  7. Bunevicius A, Suleiman M, Patel S, et al (2021) Stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of radiation-induced meningiomas: a multiinstitutional study. J Neurosurg 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.7.JNS202064

  8. Chukwueke UN, Wen PY (2019) Use of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria in clinical trials and clinical practice. CNS Oncol. https://doi.org/10.2217/cns-2018-0007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Claus EB, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M, Black PM (2005) Epidemiology of intracranial meningioma. Neurosurgery 57(6):1088–1095 (discussion 1088–1095)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen-Inbar O, Lee C-C, Sheehan JP (2016) The contemporary role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 27(2):215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Conti A, Pontoriero A, Midili F, Iatì G, Siragusa C, Tomasello C, La Torre D, Cardali SM, Pergolizzi S, De Renzis C (2015) CyberKnife multisession stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for perioptic meningiomas: intermediate-term results and radiobiological considerations. Springerplus 4:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Demiral S, Dincoglan F, Sager O, Gamsiz H, Uysal B, Gundem E, Elcim Y, Dirican B, Beyzadeoglu M (2016) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for who grade I anterior clinoid meningiomas (ACM). Jpn J Radiol 34(11):730–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ding D, Starke RM, Hantzmon J, Yen C-P, Williams BJ, Sheehan JP (2013) The role of radiosurgery in the management of WHO Grade II and III intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 35(6):E16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flannery TJ, Kano H, Lunsford LD, Sirin S, Tormenti M, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D (2010) Long-term control of petroclival meningiomas through radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 112(5):957–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganz JC, Backlund E-O, Thorsen FA (1993) The results of gamma knife surgery of meningiomas, related to size of tumor and dose. SFN 61(Suppl. 1):23–29

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giammattei L, Starnoni D, Levivier M, Messerer M, Daniel RT (2019) Surgery for clinoidal meningiomas: case series and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications. World Neurosurg 129:e700–e717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goel A, Gupta S, Desai K (2000) New grading system to predict resectability of anterior clinoid meningiomas. Neurol Med Chir 40(12):610–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hiniker SM, Modlin LA, Choi CY et al (2016) Dose-response modeling of the visual pathway tolerance to single-fraction and hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery. Semin Radiat Oncol 26(2):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2008) The principles of skull base radiosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 24(5):E11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leavitt JA, Stafford SL, Link MJ, Pollock BE (2013) Long-term evaluation of radiation-induced optic neuropathy after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87(3):524–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JH, Jeun SS, Evans J, Kosmorsky G (2001) Surgical management of clinoidal meningiomas. Neurosurgery 48(5):1012–1019 (discussion 1019–1021)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee C-C, Trifiletti DM, Sahgal A et al (2018) Stereotactic radiosurgery for benign (World Health Organization Grade I) cavernous sinus meningiomas—International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guideline: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 83(6):1128–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marchetti M, Conti A, Beltramo G, Pinzi V, Pontoriero A, Tramacere I, Senger C, Pergolizzi S, Fariselli L (2019) Multisession radiosurgery for perioptic meningiomas: medium-to-long term results from a CyberKnife cooperative study. J Neurooncol 143(3):597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. al-Mefty O, Ayoubi S, (1991) Clinoidal meningiomas. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 53:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meniai-Merzouki F, Bernier-Chastagner V, Geffrelot J, Tresch E, Lacornerie T, Coche-Dequeant B, Lartigau E, Pasquier D (2018) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with intracranial meningiomas: impact of radiotherapy regimen on local control. Sci Rep 8(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Milano MT, Grimm J, Soltys SG et al (2021) Single- and multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery dose tolerances of the optic pathways. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 110(1):87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakamura M, Roser F, Jacobs C, Vorkapic P, Samii M (2006) Medial sphenoid wing meningiomas: clinical outcome and recurrence rate. Neurosurgery 58(4):626–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pamir MN, Belirgen M, Ozduman K, Kiliç T, Ozek M (2008) Anterior clinoidal meningiomas: analysis of 43 consecutive surgically treated cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150(7):625–635 (discussion 635-636)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pamir MN, Özduman K (2020) Clinoidal meningiomas. Handb Clin Neurol 170:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Park K-J, Kano H, Iyer A, et al (2018) Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous sinus meningioma: long-term follow-up in 200 patients. J Neurosurg 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.2.JNS172361

  31. Pikis S, Bunevicius A, Sheehan J (2021) Outcomes from treatment of asymptomatic skull base meningioma with stereotactic radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir 163(1):83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Santacroce A, Walier M, Régis J et al (2012) Long-term tumor control of benign intracranial meningiomas after radiosurgery in a series of 4565 patients. Neurosurgery 70(1):32–39 (discussion 39)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L, Dinapoli R, Kline R, Loeffler J, Farnan N (2000) Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90–05. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47(2):291–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sheehan J, Pikis S, Islim A, et al (2021) An international multicenter matched cohort analysis of incidental meningioma progression during active surveillance or after stereotactic radiosurgery: the IMPASSE Study. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab132

  35. Sheehan JP, Williams BJ, Yen CP (2010) Stereotactic radiosurgery for WHO grade I meningiomas. J Neurooncol 99(3):407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stafford SL, Pollock BE, Leavitt JA, Foote RL, Brown PD, Link MJ, Gorman DA, Schomberg PJ (2003) A study on the radiation tolerance of the optic nerves and chiasm after stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55(5):1177–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Starke RM, Przybylowski CJ, Sugoto M, Fezeu F, Awad AJ, Ding D, Nguyen JH, Sheehan JP (2015) Gamma Knife radiosurgery of large skull base meningiomas. J Neurosurg 122(2):363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Starke RM, Williams BJ, Hiles C, Nguyen JH, Elsharkawy MY, Sheehan JP (2012) Gamma knife surgery for skull base meningiomas. J Neurosurg 116(3):588–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sughrue M, Kane A, Rutkowski MJ, Berger MS, McDermott MW Meningiomas of the anterior clinoid process: is it wise to drill out the optic canal? Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.321

  40. Tobias S, Kim C-H, Kosmorsky G, Lee JH (2003) Management of surgical clinoidal meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus 14(6):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Vera E, Iorgulescu JB, Raper DMS, Madhavan K, Lally BE, Morcos J, Elhammady S, Sherman J, Komotar RJ (2014) A review of stereotactic radiosurgery practice in the management of skull base meningiomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 75(3):152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Whittle IR, Smith C, Navoo P, Collie D (2004) Meningiomas Lancet 363(9420):1535–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB (2010) Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol 99(3):307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu T, Yan Y, Evins AI et al (2020) Anterior clinoidal meningiomas: meningeal anatomical considerations and surgical implications. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00634

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang D-Y, Sheehan J, Liu Y-S, ChangLai S-P, Pan H-C, Chen C-J, Chou M-C (2009) Analysis of factors associated with volumetric data errors in gamma knife radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 87(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Sheehan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Data collection was approved at each individual center participating in this study.

Consent to participate

N/A.

Consent for publication

N/A.

Conflict of interest

R.L. consultant of Elekta; C.P.C. Carl Zeiss Meditech AG (Speaking Honoraium, unrelated).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Tumor—Meningioma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bunevicius, A., Pikis, S., Anand, R.K. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for clinoid meningiomas: a multi-institutional study. Acta Neurochir 163, 2861–2869 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04972-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04972-3

Keywords

Navigation