Abstract
Background
The advantages of biportal endoscopic approaches over conventional open surgery include the preservation of the normal structures, less intraoperative bleeding, fast postoperative recovery, and preservation of the motion segments.
Method
We attempted the posterior biportal endoscopic approach for cervical stenosis at the C5-C6-C7 levels. Biportal endoscopic right ipsilateral hemilaminectomy with bilateral decompression at the C5-C6-C7 levels and right foraminotomy at the C6-C7 level were performed under general anesthesia.
Conclusions
We successfully performed neural decompression at the C5-C6-C7 levels using biportal endoscopic surgery. The biportal endoscopic posterior cervical approach may be an alternative surgical method for treating cervical myelopathy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heo DH, Ha JS, Lee DC, Kim HS, Chung HJ (2020) Repair of incidental durotomy using sutureless nonpenetrating clips via biportal endoscopic surgery. Global Spine J:2192568220956606. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220956606
Heo DH, Hong YH, Lee DC, Chung HJ, Park CK (2020) Technique of biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurospine 17:S129–S137. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040178.089
Heo DH, Sharma S, Park CK (2019) Endoscopic treatment of extraforaminal entrapment of L5 nerve root (far out syndrome) by unilateral biportal endoscopic approach: technical report and preliminary clinical results. Neurospine 16:130–137. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1938026.013
Hernandez RN, Wipplinger C, Navarro-Ramirez R, Soriano-Solis S, Kirnaz S, Hussain I, Schmidt FA, Soriano-Sánchez JA, Härtl R (2020) Ten-step minimally invasive cervical decompression via unilateral tubular laminotomy: technical note and early clinical experience. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 18:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz156
Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K (1996) Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199609010-00005
Hwa Eum J, Hwa Heo D, Son SK, Park CK (2016) Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg Spine 24:602–607. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.Spine15304
Sayit E, Daubs MD, Aghdasi B, Montgomery SR, Inoue H, Wang CJ, Wang BJ, Phan KH, Scott TP (2013) Dynamic changes of the ligamentum flavum in the cervical spine assessed with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Global Spine J 3:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1337121
Song KS, Lee CW (2020) The biportal endoscopic posterior cervical inclinatory foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: technical report and preliminary results. Neurospine 17:S145–S153. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040228.114
Szewczyk BS, Riccio AR, Entezami P, German JW (2020) The effect of minimally invasive dorsal cervical decompression for myelopathy on spinal alignment and range of motion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 196:105967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105967
Wang M, Luo XJ, Deng QX, Li JH, Wang N (2016) Prevalence of axial symptoms after posterior cervical decompression: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 25:2302–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4524-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key points
1. Posterior cervical unilateral laminectomy and bilateral decompression using the biportal endoscopic approach may be an alternative surgical treatment for cervical stenosis associated with myelopathy.
2. This biportal endoscopic technique may minimize injury to the cervical spinous processes, ligaments, and muscles and preserve the motion of the segment.
3. This biportal endoscopic technique should be attempted in highly selective patients with CSM at one or two levels.
4. Although there are controversies regarding the minimally invasive approaches, including endoscopic approaches, in the treatment of cervical myelopathy, these approaches have several benefits such as preservation of muscles and ligaments, small amount of intraoperative bleeding, fast postoperative recovery, and preservation of the motion segments.
5. We successfully performed full decompression of cervical stenosis using a biportal endoscopic posterior approach.
6. Conventional surgeries such as laminoplasty or laminectomy with fusion procedures should be considered for multilevel cervical stenosis instead of minimally invasive microscopic laminotomy or endoscopic laminotomy.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine degenerative
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 Video 1 A video clip of the biportal endoscopic decompressive procedure for cervical stenosis (MP4 128289 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, J., Heo, D.H., Lee, D.C. et al. Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir 163, 2537–2543 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04921-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04921-0