Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical anatomy and nuances of the expanded transpterygoid approach to the pterygopalatine fossa and upper parapharyngeal space: a stepwise cadaveric dissection

  • How I Do it - Neurosurgical Anatomy
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Superb knowledge of anatomy and techniques to remove the natural barriers preventing full access to the most lateral aspect of the skull base determines the ease of using the transpterygoid approach (ETPA) as the main gateway for all the coronal planes during endonasal surgeries.

Methods

Throughout stepwise image-guided cadaveric dissections, we describe the surgical anatomy and nuances of the ETPA to the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) and upper parapharyngeal space (UPPS).

Conclusion

The ETPA represents a lateral extension of the midline corridor and provides a valuable route to access the PPF/UPPS. Major landmarks for this EEA are the infraorbital canal, sphenopalatine foramen, and vidian nerve. It comprises the removal of the palatine bone, posterior wall of the maxillary sinus, and PPF transposition to drill the pterygoid process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EEA:

Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach

ETPA:

Expanded transpterygoid approach

e-ICG:

Indocyanine-green video angiography

ITF:

Infratemporal fossa

IMA:

Internal maxillary artery

JNA:

Juvenile angiofibroma

PPF:

Pterygopalatine fossa

SPA:

Sphenopalatine artery

PWMS:

The posterior wall of the maxillary sinus

UPPS:

Upper parapharyngeal space

VN:

Vidian nerve

References

  1. Abuzayed B, Tanriover N, Gazioglu N, Cetin G, Akar Z (2009) Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomic study. J Neurosurg Sci 53(2):37–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardesty DA, Montaser AS, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM (2018) Limits of endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach to cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave. J Neurosurg Sci 62(3):332–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaen A, Ruiz-Valdepeñas EC, Di Somma A, Esteban F, Rivas JM, Fernandez JA (2019) Refining the anatomic boundaries of the endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach: the “VELPPHA area” concept. J Neurosurg 131(3):911–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kasemsiri P, Solares CA, Carrau RL, Prosser JD, Prevedello DM, Otto BA, Old M, Kassam AB (2013) Endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approaches: anatomical landmarks for planning the surgical corridor. Laryngoscope 123(4):811–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, Osawa S, Seker A, Rhoton AL (2010) The front door to Meckelʼs cave. Oper Neurosurg 64(March):ons71–ons83

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuet M-L, Kasbekar AV, Masterson L, Jani P (2015) Management of tumors arising from the parapharyngeal space: a systematic review of 1,293 cases reported over 25 years. Laryngoscope 125(6):1372–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li L, London NR, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL (2019) Anatomy based corridors to the infratemporal fossa: implications for endoscopic approaches. Head Neck (October) 1–8

  8. Li L, London NR, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL (2020) Endonasal endoscopic transpterygoid approach to the upper parapharyngeal space. Head Neck (February) 1–7

  9. Statham MM, Tami TA (2006) Endoscopic anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17(3):197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaz-Guimaraes F, Nakassa ACI, Gardner PA, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC (2017) Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral jugular foramen: anatomical basis, technical considerations, and clinical series. Oper Neurosurg 13(4):482–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Thaïs Cristina Rejane-Heim, MD (Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA, and Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil); Thiago Albonette-Felicio, MD (Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA); Leonardo Schmidt Bertazzo Silveira and Andrei Koerbel, MD (Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Joinville, SC, BR); Ahmed Gamal Sholkamy Diab, MD (Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Assiut University, Egypt); Mohammad Salah Mahmoud Mady (Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ain Shams University, Egypt); and Ruichun Li, MD (Department of Neurological Surgery, the first affiliated hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China) for their contribution to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Giuliano Silveira-Bertazzo or Daniel M. Prevedello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This study was performed at ALT-VISION at The Ohio State University. This laboratory receives educational support from the following companies: Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Intuitive Surgical Corp., KLS Martin Corp., Karl Storz Endoscopy, Leica Microsystems, Medtronic Corp., Stryker Corp., and Vycor Medical. Dr. Prevedello is a consultant for Stryker Corp., Medtronic Corp., and Integra; he has received an honorarium from Mizuho and royalties from KLS-Martin and ACE MEdical. Ricardo L. Carrau is a consultant for Medtronic Corp.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

• The ETPA provides an avenue in the-off midline corridor and a valuable route to access the PPF/UPPS.

• If there is no need for extensive drilling of the pterygoid process or PPF/ITF dissections, the VN can be preserved, while the PPF is gently lateralized (still covered by the periosteum) avoiding neurovascular injury.

• The CE of the palatine bone helps to identify the sphenopalatine foramen and control the SPA.

• The adoption of e-ICG can help locate the carotid artery.

• The vascularized nasoseptal flap should be raised from the contralateral side.

• Identification of the VN, ET, and tubal muscles with the full understanding of its surrounding anatomy helps to locate the various ICA segments and avoid catastrophic bleeding.

• The ION serves as a landmark to delineate the PPF/ITF-approach and to estimate the need for early exposures (i.e., Denker)

• Adoption of the endonasal-Doppler and CT-A/MRI-neuronavigation help to reduce vascular complications.

• Cranial nerves and extraocular EMG monitoring reduce postoperative comorbidities.

• Staying anterior to the ET and V3 would avoid parapharyngeal-ICA injury.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurosurgical Anatomy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silveira-Bertazzo, G., Martinez-Perez, R., Carrau, R.L. et al. Surgical anatomy and nuances of the expanded transpterygoid approach to the pterygopalatine fossa and upper parapharyngeal space: a stepwise cadaveric dissection. Acta Neurochir 163, 415–421 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04551-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04551-y

Keywords

Navigation