Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

VNS implantation in a NF1 patient: massive nerve hypertrophy discovered intra-operatively preventing successful electrode placement. Case report

  • Case Report - Functional Neurosurgery - Epilepsy
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the vast majority of surgeons, no specific investigation is necessary before vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) implantation. We report our intraoperative unexpected finding of a massively enlarged vagus nerve in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The nerve hypertrophy prevented wrapping the coils of the helical electrode. The patient had no signs of vagus nerve dysfunction preoperatively (no hoarseness or dysphonia). This exceptional mishap is undoubtedly related to NF1-associated peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Even though it is not advisable to routinely perform any imaging prior to VNS, in such specific context, preoperative imaging work-up, especially cervical ultrasound, might be judicious to rule out any asymptomatic enlarged left vagus nerve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al Omari AI, Alzoubi FQ, Alsalem MM, Aburahma SK, Mardini DT, Castellanos PF (2017) The vagal nerve stimulation outcome, and laryngeal effect: otolaryngologists roles and perspective. Am J Otolaryngol 38(4):408–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anand IS, Konstam MA, Klein HU et al (2020) Comparison of symptomatic and functional responses to vagus nerve stimulation in ANTHEM-HF, INOVATE-HF, and NECTAR-HF. ESC Heart Fail 7(1):75–83

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Anil G, Tan T-Y (2011) CT and MRI evaluation of nerve sheath tumors of the cervical vagus nerve. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(1):195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Menachem E, Hellström K, Waldton C, Augustinsson LE (1999) Evaluation of refractory epilepsy treated with vagus nerve stimulation for up to 5 years. Neurology 52(6):1265–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonaz B, Sinniger V, Hoffmann D et al (2016) Chronic vagus nerve stimulation in Crohn’s disease: a 6-month follow-up pilot study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 28(6):948–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bottomley JM, LeReun C, Diamantopoulos A, Mitchell S, Gaynes BN (2019) Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy in patients with treatment resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Compr Psychiatry 98:152156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bray DP, Chan AK, Chin CT, Jacques L (2016) Large cervical vagus nerve tumor in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 treated with gross total resection: case report and review of the literature. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 11(1):e48–e54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cartwright MS, Passmore LV, Yoon J-S, Brown ME, Caress JB, Walker FO (2008) Cross-sectional area reference values for nerve ultrasonography. Muscle Nerve 37(5):566–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen H-H, Chen T-C, Yang T-L, Wang C-P (2019) Transcutaneous sonography for detection of the cervical vagus nerve. Ear Nose Throat J. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319875432

  10. Englot DJ, Chang EF, Auguste KI (2011) Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response. J Neurosurg 115(6):1248–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giovagnorio F, Martinoli C (2001) Sonography of the cervical vagus nerve: normal appearance and abnormal findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(3):745–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gutmann DH, Ferner RE, Listernick RH, Korf BR, Wolters PL, Johnson KJ (2017) Neurofibromatosis type 1. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamdi H, Spatola G, Lagarde S, McGonigal A, Paz-Paredes A, Bizeau A, Bartolomei F, Carron R (2019) Use of polyvinyl alcohol sponge cubes for vagal nerve stimulation: a suggestion for the wrapping step. Technical Note and Step-by-Step Operative Technique. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz227

  14. Hammer N, Löffler S, Cakmak YO, Ondruschka B, Planitzer U, Schultz M, Winkler D, Weise D (2018) Cervical vagus nerve morphometry and vascularity in the context of nerve stimulation—a cadaveric study. Sci Rep 8(1):7997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson RL, Wilson CG (2018) A review of vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic intervention. J Inflamm Res 11:203–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kahlow H, Olivecrona M (2013) Complications of vagal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a single center longitudinal study of 143 patients. Seizure 22(10):827–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerasnoudis A, Tsivgoulis G (2015) Nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathies: a review. J Neuroimaging 25(4):528–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knappertz VA, Tegeler CH, Hardin SJ, McKinney WM (1998) Vagus nerve imaging with ultrasound: anatomic and in vivo validation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118(1):82–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JH, Cheng K-L, Choi YJ, Baek JH (2017) High-resolution imaging of neural anatomy and pathology of the neck. Korean J Radiol 18(1):180–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin JLR, Martín-Sánchez E (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of depression: variable results based on study designs. Eur Psychiatry 27(3):147–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McGregor A, Wheless J, Baumgartner J, Bettis D (2005) Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment for refractory epilepsy in humans. Epilepsia 46(1):91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Navas M, Navarrete EG, Pascual JM, Carrasco R, Núñez JA, Shakur SF, Pastor J, Sola RG (2010) Treatment of refractory epilepsy in adult patients with right-sided vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsy Res 90(1–2):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pelz JO, Belau E, Henn P, Hammer N, Classen J, Weise D (2018) Sonographic evaluation of the vagus nerves: protocol, reference values, and side-to-side differences. Muscle Nerve 57(5):766–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Planitzer U, Hammer N, Bechmann I, Glätzner J, Löffler S, Möbius R, Tillmann BN, Weise D, Winkler D (2017) Positional relations of the cervical vagus nerve revisited. Neuromodulation 20(4):361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw GY, Sechtem P, Searl J, Dowdy ES (2006) Predictors of laryngeal complications in patients implanted with the Cyberonics vagal nerve stimulator. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115(4):260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spuck S, Nowak G, Renneberg A, Tronnier V, Sperner J (2008) Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation in humans: an effective therapy? Epilepsy Res 82(2–3):232–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zaidman CM, Al-Lozi M, Pestronk A (2009) Peripheral nerve size in normals and patients with polyneuropathy: an ultrasound study. Muscle Nerve 40(6):960–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romain Carron.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

R.C. received honoraria from Cyberonics/Livanova for sharing expertise about VNS surgery during symposium. Other authors have no relevant disclosure. M.D. is an employee of LivaNova PLC and holds stock options.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Functional Neurosurgery - Epilepsy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamdi, H., Brun, G., Zanello, M. et al. VNS implantation in a NF1 patient: massive nerve hypertrophy discovered intra-operatively preventing successful electrode placement. Case report. Acta Neurochir 162, 2509–2512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04535-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04535-y

Keywords

Navigation