Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detecting small conflicting drainages with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography for surgical planning: a technical description and quantified analysis

  • Technical Note - Functional Neurosurgery - Epilepsy
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have shown the challenges involved in detecting small conflicting vessels (1.0–1.5 mm) on contrast-enhanced (CE) T1 images during stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) planning. Improving the resolution of non-invasive approaches to identify these vessels is possible and important. We present a superior sagittal sinus mapping–based CE-magnetic resonance venography (CE-MRV) protocol calibrated by craniotomies.

Method

Seven patients with epileptic symptoms who received craniotomy were enrolled. CE-MRV was acquired with a bolus mapping of the superior sagittal sinus. Together with the T1 image, 3D veins and the brain surface were visualized. The resolution of the CE-MRV was quantified by measuring the diameter of superficial drainages after exposure of the brain surface during craniotomy.

Results

A total of 37 superficial drainages were exposed in the bone windows. CE-MRV visualized all these drainages. On average, one superficial drainage could be found in every 13.2 mm diameter of the bone window. The boundary resolution of the CE-MRV was 0.58–0.8 mm in vessel diameter, while drainages larger than 0.8 mm were visualized consistently.

Conclusions

The resolution of the CE-MRV in the present study met the requirement for detection of small conflicting vessels during SEEG planning. The visualized venous landmarks could be used for visual guidance to the surgical zone. As a non-invasive approach, CE-MRV is practical to use in the clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

CE:

Contrast-enhanced

SEEG:

Stereoelectroencephalography

CE-MRV:

CE-magnetic resonance venography

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

SSS:

Superior sagittal sinus

BRAVO:

Brain volume imaging

SPM:

Statistical Parametric Mapping toolkits

TPM:

Tissue probability maps

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

FMRIB:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain

FSL:

FMRIB Software Library

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

SCV:

Superior cerebral veins

SMCF:

Superficial middle cerebral vein

ICV:

Inferior cerebral veins

References

  1. Agrawal D, Naik V (2015) Postoperative cerebral venous infarction. J Pediatr Neurosci 10:5–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-1745.154314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Balanescu B, Franklin R, Ciurea J, Mindruta I, Rasina A, Bobulescu RC, Donos C, Barborica A (2014) A personalized stereotactic fixture for implantation of depth electrodes in stereoelectroencephalography. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 92:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayer S, Maier A, Ostermeier M, Fahrig R (2017) Intraoperative imaging modalities and compensation for brain shift in tumor resection surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging 2017:6028645. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6028645

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, Casaceli G, Schiariti MP, Miserocchi A, Fuschillo D, Moscato A, Caborni C, Arnulfo G, Lo Russo G (2013) Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery 72:353–366; discussion 366. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827d1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardinale F, Pero G, Quilici L, Piano M, Colombo P, Moscato A, Castana L, Casaceli G, Fuschillo D, Gennari L, Cenzato M, Lo Russo G, Cossu M (2015) Cerebral angiography for multimodal surgical planning in epilepsy surgery: description of a new three-dimensional technique and literature review. World Neurosurg 84:358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilard V, Proust F, Gerardin E, Lebas A, Chastan N, Freger P, Parain D, Derrey S (2016) Usefulness of multidetector-row computerized tomographic angiography for the surgical planning in stereoelectroencephalography. Diagn Interv Imaging 97:333–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.10.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guénot M (2012) SEEG electrodes implantation using flat-panel X-ray detectors and robot. Stereotaxy and Epilepsy Surgery Montrouge. John Libbey Eurotext, France, pp 219–244

    Google Scholar 

  8. Han H, Yao Z, Wang H, Deng X, Yu Fong AH, Zhang M (2008) Dural entrance of the bridging vein into the transverse sinus provides a reliable measure for preoperative planning: an anatomic comparison between cadavers and neuroimages. Neurosurgery 62:ONS289–ONS295; discussion ONS295-286. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000326009.46197.ab

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kallmes DF, Layton K, Marx WF, Tong F (2007) Death by nondiagnosis: why emergent CT angiography should not be done for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1837–1838. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li K, Vakharia VN, Sparks R, Rodionov R, Vos SB, McEvoy AW, Miserocchi A, Wang M, Ourselin S, Duncan JS (2019) Stereoelectroencephalography electrode placement: detection of blood vessel conflicts. Epilepsia 60:1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Minkin K, Gabrovski K, Penkov M, Todorov Y, Tanova R, Milenova Y, Romansky K, Dimova P (2017) Stereoelectroencephalography using magnetic resonance angiography for avascular trajectory planning: technical report. Neurosurgery 81:688–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirzayan MJ, von Roden M, Bulacio J, von Podewils F, Gonzalez-Martinez J (2016) The usefulness of intraoperative cerebral C-arm CT angiogram for implantation of intracranial depth electrodes in stereotactic electroencephalography procedure. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 94:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1159/000431372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Papademetris X, DeLorenzo C, Flossmann S, Neff M, Vives KP, Spencer DD, Staib LH, Duncan JS (2009) From medical image computing to computer-aided intervention: development of a research interface for image-guided navigation. Int J Med Robot 5:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Savardekar AR, Patra DP, Narayan V, Thakur JD, Nanda A (2018) Incidence, pathophysiology, and prevention strategies for cerebral venous complications after neurologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg 119:294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sayhan S, Guvencer M, Ozer E, Arda MN (2012) Morphometric evaluation of parasagittal venous anatomy for intracranial approaches: a cadaveric study. Turk Neurosurg 22:540–546. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.Jtn.4086-11.3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spetzger U, Hubbe U, Struffert T, Reinges MH, Krings T, Krombach GA, Zentner J, Gilsbach JM, Stiehl HS (2002) Error analysis in cranial neuronavigation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-23583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tamura M, Sato I, Maruyama T, Ohshima K, Mangin JF, Nitta M, Saito T, Yamada H, Minami S, Masamune K, Kawamata T, Iseki H, Muragaki Y (2019) Integrated datasets of normalized brain with functional localization using intra-operative electrical stimulation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14:2109–2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01957-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanriverdi T, Ajlan A, Poulin N, Olivier A (2009) Morbidity in epilepsy surgery: an experience based on 2449 epilepsy surgery procedures from a single institution. J Neurosurg 110:1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.8.Jns08338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei PH, Cong F, Chen G, Li MC, Yu XG, Bao YH (2017) Neuronavigation based on track density image extracted from deterministic high-definition fiber tractography. World Neurosurg 98:880.e889–880.e815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81801288 and 81871009). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong-Zhi Shan or Guo-Guang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical committee of Xuanwu Hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Functional Neurosurgery - Epilepsy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, PH., Yu, ZY., Zhao, C. et al. Detecting small conflicting drainages with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography for surgical planning: a technical description and quantified analysis. Acta Neurochir 162, 2519–2526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04345-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04345-2

Keywords

Navigation