Abstract
Background
Recent studies have shown the challenges involved in detecting small conflicting vessels (1.0–1.5 mm) on contrast-enhanced (CE) T1 images during stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) planning. Improving the resolution of non-invasive approaches to identify these vessels is possible and important. We present a superior sagittal sinus mapping–based CE-magnetic resonance venography (CE-MRV) protocol calibrated by craniotomies.
Method
Seven patients with epileptic symptoms who received craniotomy were enrolled. CE-MRV was acquired with a bolus mapping of the superior sagittal sinus. Together with the T1 image, 3D veins and the brain surface were visualized. The resolution of the CE-MRV was quantified by measuring the diameter of superficial drainages after exposure of the brain surface during craniotomy.
Results
A total of 37 superficial drainages were exposed in the bone windows. CE-MRV visualized all these drainages. On average, one superficial drainage could be found in every 13.2 mm diameter of the bone window. The boundary resolution of the CE-MRV was 0.58–0.8 mm in vessel diameter, while drainages larger than 0.8 mm were visualized consistently.
Conclusions
The resolution of the CE-MRV in the present study met the requirement for detection of small conflicting vessels during SEEG planning. The visualized venous landmarks could be used for visual guidance to the surgical zone. As a non-invasive approach, CE-MRV is practical to use in the clinical setting.
Abbreviations
- CE:
-
Contrast-enhanced
- SEEG:
-
Stereoelectroencephalography
- CE-MRV:
-
CE-magnetic resonance venography
- DSA:
-
Digital subtraction angiography
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- SSS:
-
Superior sagittal sinus
- BRAVO:
-
Brain volume imaging
- SPM:
-
Statistical Parametric Mapping toolkits
- TPM:
-
Tissue probability maps
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- FMRIB:
-
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain
- FSL:
-
FMRIB Software Library
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- SCV:
-
Superior cerebral veins
- SMCF:
-
Superficial middle cerebral vein
- ICV:
-
Inferior cerebral veins
References
Agrawal D, Naik V (2015) Postoperative cerebral venous infarction. J Pediatr Neurosci 10:5–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-1745.154314
Balanescu B, Franklin R, Ciurea J, Mindruta I, Rasina A, Bobulescu RC, Donos C, Barborica A (2014) A personalized stereotactic fixture for implantation of depth electrodes in stereoelectroencephalography. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 92:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360226
Bayer S, Maier A, Ostermeier M, Fahrig R (2017) Intraoperative imaging modalities and compensation for brain shift in tumor resection surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging 2017:6028645. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6028645
Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, Casaceli G, Schiariti MP, Miserocchi A, Fuschillo D, Moscato A, Caborni C, Arnulfo G, Lo Russo G (2013) Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery 72:353–366; discussion 366. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827d1161
Cardinale F, Pero G, Quilici L, Piano M, Colombo P, Moscato A, Castana L, Casaceli G, Fuschillo D, Gennari L, Cenzato M, Lo Russo G, Cossu M (2015) Cerebral angiography for multimodal surgical planning in epilepsy surgery: description of a new three-dimensional technique and literature review. World Neurosurg 84:358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.028
Gilard V, Proust F, Gerardin E, Lebas A, Chastan N, Freger P, Parain D, Derrey S (2016) Usefulness of multidetector-row computerized tomographic angiography for the surgical planning in stereoelectroencephalography. Diagn Interv Imaging 97:333–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.10.001
Guénot M (2012) SEEG electrodes implantation using flat-panel X-ray detectors and robot. Stereotaxy and Epilepsy Surgery Montrouge. John Libbey Eurotext, France, pp 219–244
Han H, Yao Z, Wang H, Deng X, Yu Fong AH, Zhang M (2008) Dural entrance of the bridging vein into the transverse sinus provides a reliable measure for preoperative planning: an anatomic comparison between cadavers and neuroimages. Neurosurgery 62:ONS289–ONS295; discussion ONS295-286. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000326009.46197.ab
Kallmes DF, Layton K, Marx WF, Tong F (2007) Death by nondiagnosis: why emergent CT angiography should not be done for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1837–1838. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0809
Li K, Vakharia VN, Sparks R, Rodionov R, Vos SB, McEvoy AW, Miserocchi A, Wang M, Ourselin S, Duncan JS (2019) Stereoelectroencephalography electrode placement: detection of blood vessel conflicts. Epilepsia 60:1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16294
Minkin K, Gabrovski K, Penkov M, Todorov Y, Tanova R, Milenova Y, Romansky K, Dimova P (2017) Stereoelectroencephalography using magnetic resonance angiography for avascular trajectory planning: technical report. Neurosurgery 81:688–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx166
Mirzayan MJ, von Roden M, Bulacio J, von Podewils F, Gonzalez-Martinez J (2016) The usefulness of intraoperative cerebral C-arm CT angiogram for implantation of intracranial depth electrodes in stereotactic electroencephalography procedure. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 94:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1159/000431372
Papademetris X, DeLorenzo C, Flossmann S, Neff M, Vives KP, Spencer DD, Staib LH, Duncan JS (2009) From medical image computing to computer-aided intervention: development of a research interface for image-guided navigation. Int J Med Robot 5:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.241
Savardekar AR, Patra DP, Narayan V, Thakur JD, Nanda A (2018) Incidence, pathophysiology, and prevention strategies for cerebral venous complications after neurologic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg 119:294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.231
Sayhan S, Guvencer M, Ozer E, Arda MN (2012) Morphometric evaluation of parasagittal venous anatomy for intracranial approaches: a cadaveric study. Turk Neurosurg 22:540–546. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.Jtn.4086-11.3
Spetzger U, Hubbe U, Struffert T, Reinges MH, Krings T, Krombach GA, Zentner J, Gilsbach JM, Stiehl HS (2002) Error analysis in cranial neuronavigation. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-23583
Tamura M, Sato I, Maruyama T, Ohshima K, Mangin JF, Nitta M, Saito T, Yamada H, Minami S, Masamune K, Kawamata T, Iseki H, Muragaki Y (2019) Integrated datasets of normalized brain with functional localization using intra-operative electrical stimulation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14:2109–2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01957-7
Tanriverdi T, Ajlan A, Poulin N, Olivier A (2009) Morbidity in epilepsy surgery: an experience based on 2449 epilepsy surgery procedures from a single institution. J Neurosurg 110:1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.8.Jns08338
Wei PH, Cong F, Chen G, Li MC, Yu XG, Bao YH (2017) Neuronavigation based on track density image extracted from deterministic high-definition fiber tractography. World Neurosurg 98:880.e889–880.e815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.029
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81801288 and 81871009). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical committee of Xuanwu Hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publish
All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Functional Neurosurgery - Epilepsy
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, PH., Yu, ZY., Zhao, C. et al. Detecting small conflicting drainages with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography for surgical planning: a technical description and quantified analysis. Acta Neurochir 162, 2519–2526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04345-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04345-2