Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Posterolateral myelotomy for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the other way to do it?

  • Original Article - Spine - Other
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

To evaluate posterolateral myelotomy (PLM) as a surgical method for all cases of intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT) by assessing the surgical and functional outcomes of patients treated in our clinic.

Materials and methods

Patients with IMSCT who underwent surgery using PLM from 2013 to 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Objective and quantitative assessment of the preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up neurological status was performed by using the modified McCormick functional schema and sensory pain scale.

Results

A total of 33 operations were performed on 27 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The mean grade on the McCormick functional schema increased insignificantly from 2.0 preoperatively to 2.3 immediately postoperatively and decreased back to 2.1 at the follow-up examination. Just one patient exhibited a transient proprioception deficit. Significant pain relief was observed as expressed in an improvement of mean grade on the sensory pain scale. Only in two cases was late neuropathic pain reported. A gross total resection/subtotal resection (GTR/STR) was achieved in all cases of hemangioblastoma and cavernoma, while for the majority of astrocytomas, only partial removal was accomplished. For ependymoma, which represents the most common IMSCT, a GTR/STR was realized in 12 cases (86%). A statistically significant difference (p = 0.027) was found when comparing the extent of tumor resection (EOR) between the two most common IMSCT, i.e., ependymoma and astrocytoma.

Conclusion

PLM may be considered a reliable surgical method for IMSCT, as it combines a satisfactory EOR with reduced risk of tissue damage and excellent pain relief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Boström A, Kanther N-C, Grote A, Boström J (2014) Management and outcome in adult intramedullary spinal cord tumours: a 20-year single institution experience. BMC Res Notes 7(1):908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Rubin Grandis J, Takata T, Slootweg PJ, International Agency for Research on Cancer WHO classification of head and neck tumours. https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who-Iarc-Classification-Of-Tumours/Who-Classification-Of-Head-And-Neck-Tumours-2017

  3. Fischer G, Brotchi J (1994) Intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Report. French Society of Neurosurgery. 45th annual congress. Angers, June 12-15 1994. Neurochirurgie 40(Suppl 1):1–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karikari IO, Nimjee SM, Hodges TR et al (2015) Impact of tumor histology on resectability and neurological outcome in primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 76(suppl_1):S4–S13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Klekamp J (2013) Treatment of intramedullary tumors: analysis of surgical morbidity and long-term results. J Neurosurg Spine 19(1):12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kucia EJ, Bambakidis NC, Chang SW, Spetzler RF (2011) Surgical technique and outcomes in the treatment of spinal cord ependymomas, part 1: intramedullary ependymomas. Oper Neurosurg 68(1 Suppl Operative):ons57–ons63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S-H, Chung CK, Kim CH, Yoon SH, Hyun S-J, Kim K-J, Kim E-S, Eoh W, Kim H-J (2013) Long-term outcomes of surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiation therapy for treatment of spinal ependymoma: a retrospective multicenter study by the Korea Spinal Oncology Research Group. Neuro-Oncology 15(7):921–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li T, Chu J, Xu Y, Yang J, Wang J, Huang Y-H, Kwan A-L, Wang G-H (2014) Surgical strategies and outcomes of spinal ependymomas of different lengths: analysis of 210 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 21(2):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manzano G, Green BA, Vanni S, Levi AD (2008) Contemporary management of adult intramedullary spinal tumors-pathology and neurological outcomes related to surgical resection. Spinal Cord 46(8):540–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCormick PC, Torres R, Post KD, Stein BM (1990) Intramedullary ependymoma of the spinal cord. J Neurosurg 72(4):523–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Atiba A, Attenello F, Yao KC, Jallo GI (2008) Resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in children: assessment of long-term motor and sensory deficits. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1(1):63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura M, Tsuji O, Iwanami A, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M (2012) Central neuropathic pain after surgical resection in patients with spinal intramedullary tumor. J Orthop Sci 17(4):352–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nashold BS, Ostdahl RH (1979) Dorsal root entry zone lesions for pain relief. J Neurosurg 51(1):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, Boscia A, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2018) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro Oncol 20(suppl_4):iv1–iv86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Samartzis D, Gillis CC, Shih P, O’Toole JE, Fessler RG (2016) Intramedullary spinal cord tumors: part II-management options and outcomes. Glob Spine J 6(2):176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein BM, McCormick PC (1992) Intramedullary neoplasms and vascular malformations. Clin Neurosurg 39:361–387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takami T, Naito K, Yamagata T, Kawahara S, Ohata K (2017) Surgical outcomes of posterolateral sulcus approach for spinal intramedullary tumors: tumor resection and functional preservation. World Neurosurg 108:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tobin MK, Geraghty JR, Engelhard HH, Linninger AA, Mehta AI (2015) Intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a review of current and future treatment strategies. Neurosurg Focus 39(2):E14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: SK and CB. Acquisition of medical data of the patients: SK and CB. Data analysis and interpretation: SK. Manuscript writing: SK. Revision of the manuscript: AEC, CS, and CB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sotirios Katsigiannis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine - Other

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katsigiannis, S., Carolus, A.E., Schmieder, K. et al. Posterolateral myelotomy for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the other way to do it?. Acta Neurochir 162, 101–107 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04151-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04151-5

Keywords

Navigation