Skip to main content
Log in

How I do it? Lumbar cortical bone trajectory fixation with image-guided neuronavigation

  • How I Do it - Spine degenerative
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cortical bone trajectory was described in 2009 to reduce screw loosening in osteoporotic patients. Since then, it has demonstrated improvements in biomechanical and perioperative results compared to pedicle screws, and it have been described as a minimally invasive technique.

Method

We describe our experience with the technique assisted by 3D neuronavigation and review some of the complications and tools to avoid them together with limitations and pitfalls.

Conclusion

Cortical bone trajectory guided by 3D neuronavigation helps to reduce the need for radiation and incidence of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delgado-Fernandez J, García-Pallero MÁ, Blasco G, Pulido-Rivas P, Sola RG (2017) Review of cortical bone trajectory: evidence of a new technique. Asian Spine J. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.5.817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hung C, Wu M, Hong R, Weng M, Yu G (2016) Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with conventional and cortical bone trajectory. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 145:41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khanna N, Deol G, Poulter G, Ahuja A (2016) Medialized, muscle-splitting approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(8):90–96

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Asazuma T, Chiba K (2016) Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory. J Neurosurg Spine 24(6):910–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, Imabayashi H, Asazuma T, Nemoto K (2014) Cortical bone trajectory for lumbosacral fixation: penetrating S-1 endplate screw technique. J Neurosurg Pediatr 21(August):203–209

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ohkawa T, Iwatsuki K, Ohnishi Y, Ninomiya K (2015) Isthmus-guided cortical bone trajectory reduces postoperative increases in serum creatinine phosphokinase concentrations. Orthop Surg 7(3):232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MAW, Womack WJ, Puttlitz CM (2009) Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 9(5):366–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sellin J, Raskin J, Staggers K, Brayton A, Briceño V, Moreno A, Jea A (2018) Feasibility and safety of using thoracic and lumbar cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws in spinal constructs in children: technical note. J Neurosurg Pediatr 21(2):190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Snyder LA, Martinez-Del-Campo E, Neal MT, Zaidi HA, Awad AW, Bina R, Ponce FA, Kaibara T, Chang SW (2016) Lumbar spinal fixation with cortical bone trajectory pedicle screws in 79 patients with degenerative disease: perioperative outcomes and complications. World Neurosurg 88:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wochna JC, Marciano R, Catanescu I, Katz J, Spalding MC (2018) Cortical trajectory pedicle screws for the fixation of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Cureus 10(6):e2891

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Delgado-Fernández.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

• Preoperative CT scan to measure pedicle diameter and grade of osteoporosis.

• Neuronavigation array is fixed with iliac crest pins.

• 3D fluoroscopy is obtained before opening, reducing the need for localization with radioscopy.

• Wound incision could be limited to 5–7 cm.

• Muscle dissection is limited to the lateral part of the pars without the need of transverse process exposure.

• Insertion point and path is described with the drill and neuronavigation probe with a medial to lateral and caudo-cephalad disposition.

• Use the tap to avoid widening of the path and avoid pedicle fracture.

• Guided-screws of at least 5.5mm diameter should be inserted to avoid breakage.

• Check correct positioning of screws with 3D fluoroscopy.

• Decompression of intervertebral space with laminectomy or hemilaminectomy before attachment of the screw head to the body.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine degenerative

Electronic supplementary material

Demonstration of Neuronavigation set up and surgical procedure, showing intraoperative insertion point and screw implantation. (MP4 393,725 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delgado-Fernández, J., Pulido Rivas, P., Gil-Simoes, R. et al. How I do it? Lumbar cortical bone trajectory fixation with image-guided neuronavigation. Acta Neurochir 161, 2423–2428 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04067-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04067-0

Keywords

Navigation