Skip to main content
Log in

A modified park bench position: the “Dormeuse” position

  • How I Do it - Neurosurgery general
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Because of the restricted volume of the cisternal space, proper patient positioning on the operating table is of utmost importance during surgery by retrosigmoid approaches. Three positions are commonly used: supine, with the head rotated to the side contralateral to the lesion; the semi-sitting position; and the park bench position. Each position has advantages and disadvantages, and the surgeon should choose the one best suited to the individual patient and the pathology to be treated.

Methods

We describe a modified park bench position that we call the Dormeuse position.

Conclusion

The Dormeuse position guarantees decrease in the posterior fossa pressure and allows optimal neural and vascular manipulation and control of any aspect of the cerebellopontine angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feigl GC, Decker K, Wurms M, Krischek B, Ritz R, Unertl K, Tatagiba M (2014) Neurosurgical procedures in the semisitting position: evaluation of the risk of paradoxical venous air embolism in patients with a patent foramen ovale. World Neurosurg 81:159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jadik S, Wissing H, Friedrich K, Beck J, Seifert V, Raabe A (2009) A standardized protocol for the prevention of clinically relevant venous air embolism during neurosurgical interventions in the semisitting position. Neurosurgery 64:533–538; discussion 538-539. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000338432.55235.D3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. King MB, Harmon KR (1994) Unusual forms of pulmonary embolism. Clin Chest Med 15:561–580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mongan PD, Hinman JA (1995) Evaluation of a double-lumen multiorifice catheter for resuscitation of swine from lethal venous air embolism. Anesthesiology 83:1104–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott SM, Mayhew PA, Harris EA (1992) Pressure ulcer development in the operating room. Nursing implications. AORN J 56:242–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimizu S, Sato K, Mabuchi I, Utsuki S, Oka H, Kan S, Fujii K (2009) Brachial plexopathy due to massive swelling of the neck associated with craniotomy in the park bench position. Surg Neurol 71:504–508; discussion 508-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2007.08.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spena G, Sorrentino T, Altieri R, Zinis LR, Stefini R, Panciani PP, Fontanella M (2018) Early-career surgical practice for cerebellopontine angle tumors in the era of radiosurgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 79:269–281. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ture H, Harput MV, Bekiroglu N, Keskin O, Koner O, Ture U (2018) Effect of the degree of head elevation on the incidence and severity of venous air embolism in cranial neurosurgical procedures with patients in the semisitting position. J Neurosurg 128:1560–1569. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.1.JNS162489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshimura M, Iizaka S, Kohno M, Nagata O, Yamasaki T, Mae T, Haruyama N, Sanada H (2016) Risk factors associated with intraoperatively acquired pressure ulcers in the park-bench position: a retrospective study. Int Wound J 13:1206–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Guerrini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Comments

Rotation of the head on the tumor side brings a more horizontal view of the long axis of the posterior petrous bone which you see as an advantage but could be debatable. The consequence of such a line of sight is the need to elevate significantly the level of the operative table specially if the surgeon needs to control what is in the depth around or even in front of the porus of the IAC ; to overcome this issue, there is a need to operate seated. Surgeons who do not seat during the surgery are limited by such constraint, which is a reason why they do not rotate the head and even more rotate the head toward the opposite side. So what you see as an advantage could be seen as not comfortable by others.

Pierre-Hugues Roche

Marseille, France

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurosurgery general

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spena, G., Guerrini, F. & Grimod, G. A modified park bench position: the “Dormeuse” position. Acta Neurochir 161, 1823–1827 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04013-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04013-0

Keywords

Navigation