Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The importance of aspirin, catheterization accuracy, and catheter design in external ventricular drainage-related hemorrhage: a multicenter study of 1002 procedures

  • Original Article - Neurosurgery general
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is the commonest neurosurgical procedure performed in daily neurosurgical practice, but relatively few studies have investigated the incidence and risk factors of its related hemorrhagic complications.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective review of consecutive EVD procedures. Patients 18 years or older who underwent EVD and had a routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan performed within 24 hours were included. EVD-related hemorrhage was defined as new intracranial hemorrhage immediately adjacent or within the ventricular catheter trajectory. The volume of hemorrhage and the position of the catheter tip were assessed. A review of patient-, disease-, and surgery-related factors including the ventricular catheter design utilized was conducted. The Bonferroni correction was applied to the alpha level of significance (0.05) for multivariable analysis.

Results

Nine hundred sixty-two patients underwent 1002 EVD performed by neurosurgeons in the operating theater. Sixteen percent (154) of patients were on aspirin before the procedure. Thirty-four percent (333) of patients had intracerebral hemorrhage, 25% (251) had aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and 16% (158) had traumatic brain injury. The mean duration from EVD to the first postoperative CT scan was 20 ± 4 h. EVD-related hematomas were detected after 81 procedures with a per-catheter risk of 8.1%. Mean hematoma volume was 1.2 ± 3.3 ml. Most were less than 1 ml (grade I, 79%, 64), 1 to 15 ml (grade II) in 20% (16) and a single clot larger than 15 ml (grade III, 1%) were detected. Clinically significant hemorrhage that resulted in catheter occlusion occurred in 1.7% (17) of procedures. Most catheters (62%, 625) were optimally placed, i.e., its tip being within the ipsilateral frontal horn or third ventricle. Three non-antibiotic-impregnated ventricular catheter designs were used with 55% (550) being the 2.2-mm Integra™ catheter, 14% (137) being the 2.8-mm Medtronic™ catheter, and 31% (315) being the 3.1-mm Codman™ catheter. Independent significant predictors for EVD-related hemorrhage were the preoperative prescription of aspirin (adjusted OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.10–3.44), catheter malposition (aOR 1.99; 95% CI 1.22–3.23), and use of the 2.8-mm Medtronic™ catheter (aOR 4.22; 95% CI 2.39–7.41).

Conclusions

The per-catheter risk of hemorrhage was 8.1%, but the incidence of symptomatic hemorrhage was low. The only patient risk factor was aspirin intake. This is the first study to evaluate and establish an association between catheter malposition and catheter design with EVD-related hemorrhage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

CT:

Computed tomography

DICOM:

Digital images for communications in medicine

EVD:

External ventricular drainage

ICH:

Intracerebral hematoma

OD:

Outer diameter

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Bauer DF, McGwin G Jr, Melton SM, George RL, Markert JM (2011) The relationship between INR and development of hemorrhage with placement of ventriculostomy. J Trauma 70:1112–1117. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e7c2ae

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer DF, Razdan SN, Bartolucci AA, Markert JM (2011) Meta-analysis of hemorrhagic complications from ventriculostomy placement by neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery 69:255–260. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31821a45ba

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Binz DD, Toussaint LG 3rd, Friedman JA (2009) Hemorrhagic complications of ventriculostomy placement: a meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care 10:253–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9193-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Foreman PM, Hendrix P, Griessenauer CJ, Schmalz PG, Harrigan MR (2015) External ventricular drain placement in the intensive care unit versus operating room: evaluation of complications and accuracy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 128:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.09.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galarza M, Gimenez A, Pellicer O, Valero J, Amigo JM (2015) New designs of ventricular catheters for hydrocephalus by 3-D computational fluid dynamics. Childs Nerv Syst 31:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2477-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghajar JB (1985) A guide for ventricular catheter placement. Technical Note. J Neurosurg 63:985–986. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1985.63.6.0985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hudson JS, Prout BS, Nagahama Y, Nakagawa D, Guerrero WR, Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Dandapat S, Allan L, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Samaniego EA, Hasan D (2019) External ventricular drain and hemorrhage in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients on dual antiplatelet therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 84:479–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huh J, Joo WI, Chough CK, Park HK, Lee KJ, Rha HK (2011) Hemorrhagic complications induced by external ventricular draining catheters. Kor J Cerebrovasc Surg 13:256–262

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huyette DR, Turnbow BJ, Kaufman C, Vaslow DF, Whiting BB, Oh MY (2008) Accuracy of the freehand pass technique for ventriculostomy catheter placement: retrospective assessment using computed tomography scans. J Neurosurg 108:88–91. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/108/01/0088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kakarla UK, Kim LJ, Chang SW, Theodore N, Spetzler RF (2008) Safety and accuracy of bedside external ventricular drain placement. Neurosurgery 63:ONS162–ONS166; discussion ONS166-167. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000335031.23521.d0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ko JK, Cha SH, Choi BK, Lee JI, Yun EY, Choi CH (2014) Hemorrhage rates associated with two methods of ventriculostomy: external ventricular drainage vs. ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedure. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 54:545–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kung DK, Policeni BA, Capuano AW, Rossen JD, Jabbour PM, Torner JC, Howard MA, Hasan D (2011) Risk of ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms treated using stent-assisted coiling. J Neurosurg 114:1021–1027. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.JNS10445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin J, Morris M, Olivero W, Boop F, Sanford RA (2003) Computational and experimental study of proximal flow in ventricular catheters. Technical note. J Neurosurg 99:426–431. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.99.2.0426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Majmundar N, Sarris C, Shastri D, Doran J, Gandhi C, Assina R (2018) Hemorrhagic complications of external ventriculostomy in the aspirin and P2Y12 response assay era. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.181

  16. Maniker AH, Vaynman AY, Karimi RJ, Sabit AO, Holland B (2006) Hemorrhagic complications of external ventricular drainage. Neurosurgery 59:ONS419–ONS424; discussion ONS424-415. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000222817.99752.E6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller C, Tummala RP (2017) Risk factors for hemorrhage associated with external ventricular drain placement and removal. J Neurosurg 126:289–297. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.12.JNS152341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nesvick CL, Khan NR, Mehta GU, Klimo P Jr (2015) Image guidance in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid shunt catheter placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 77:321–331; discussion 331. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Leary ST, Kole MK, Hoover DA, Hysell SE, Thomas A, Shaffrey CI (2000) Efficacy of the Ghajar guide revisited: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 92:801–803. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.5.0801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O'Neill BR, Velez DA, Braxton EE, Whiting D, Oh MY (2008) A survey of ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitor placement practices. Surg Neurol 70:268–273; discussion 273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2007.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park J, Son W, Park KS, Kim MY, Lee J (2016) Calvarial slope affecting accuracy of Ghajar guide technique for ventricular catheter placement. J Neurosurg 124:1429–1433. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.JNS15226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Patil V, Lacson R, Vosburgh KG, Wong JM, Prevedello L, Andriole K, Mukundan S, Popp AJ, Khorasani R (2013) Factors associated with external ventricular drain placement accuracy: data from an electronic health record repository. Acta Neurochir 155:1773–1779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1769-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips SB, Delly F, Nelson C, Krishnamurthy S (2014) Bedside external ventricular drain placement: can multiple passes be predicted on the computed tomography scan before the procedure? World Neurosurg 82:739–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.08.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenbaum BP, Vadera S, Kelly ML, Kshettry VR, Weil RJ (2014) Ventriculostomy: frequency, length of stay and in-hospital mortality in the United States of America, 1988-2010. J Clin Neurosci 21:623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowe AS, Rinehart DR, Lezatte S, Langdon JR (2018) Intracerebral hemorrhage after external ventricular drain placement: an evaluation of risk factors for post-procedural hemorrhagic complications. BMC Neurol 18:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1030-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Saladino A, White JB, Wijdicks EF, Lanzino G (2009) Malplacement of ventricular catheters by neurosurgeons: a single institution experience. Neurocrit Care 10:248–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-008-9154-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Srinivasan VM, O'Neill BR, Jho D, Whiting DM, Oh MY (2014) The history of external ventricular drainage. J Neurosurg 120:228–236. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.6.JNS121577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sussman ES, Kellner CP, Nelson E, McDowell MM, Bruce SS, Bruce RA, Zhuang Z, Connolly ES Jr (2014) Hemorrhagic complications of ventriculostomy: incidence and predictors in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 120:931–936. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.12.JNS131685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tavakoli S, Peitz G, Ares W, Hafeez S, Grandhi R (2017) Complications of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring devices in neurocritical care. Neurosurg Focus 43:E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomale UW, Hosch H, Koch A, Schulz M, Stoltenburg G, Haberl EJ, Sprung C (2010) Perforation holes in ventricular catheters--is less more? Childs Nerv Syst 26:781–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-1055-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Toma AK, Camp S, Watkins LD, Grieve J, Kitchen ND (2009) External ventricular drain insertion accuracy: is there a need for change in practice. Neurosurgery 65:1197–1200; discussion 1200-1191. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000356973.39913.0B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Webb AJ, Ullman NL, Morgan TC, Muschelli J, Kornbluth J, Awad IA, Mayo S, Rosenblum M, Ziai W, Zuccarrello M, Aldrich F, John S, Harnof S, Lopez G, Broaddus WC, Wijman C, Vespa P, Bullock R, Haines SJ, Cruz-Flores S, Tuhrim S, Hill MD, Narayan R, Hanley DF, Mistie, Investigators C (2015) Accuracy of the ABC/2 score for intracerebral hemorrhage: systematic review and analysis of MISTIE, CLEAR-IVH, and CLEAR III. Stroke 46:2470–2476. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007343

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Weisenberg SH, TerMaath SC, Seaver CE, Killeffer JA (2016) Ventricular catheter development: past, present, and future. J Neurosurg 125:1504–1512. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.12.JNS151181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiesmann M, Mayer TE (2001) Intracranial bleeding rates associated with two methods of external ventricular drainage. J Clin Neurosci 8:126–128. https://doi.org/10.1054/jocn.2000.0749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Woo PYM, Wong HT, Pu JKS, Wong WK, Wong LYW, Lee MWY, Yam KY, Lui WM, Poon WS (2017) Moving the goalposts: a comparison of different definitions for primary external ventricular drain infection and its risk factors: a multi-center study of 2575 patients. J Clin Neurosci 45:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.05.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yuen J, Selbi W, Muquit S, Berei T (2018) Complication rates of external ventricular drain insertion by surgeons of different experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100:221–225. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu X (2017) The hemorrhage risk of prophylactic external ventricular drain insertion in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients requiring endovascular aneurysm treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Sci 61:53–63. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03244-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Y. M. Woo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurosurgery general

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woo, P.Y.M., Ng, B.C.F., Xiao, J.X. et al. The importance of aspirin, catheterization accuracy, and catheter design in external ventricular drainage-related hemorrhage: a multicenter study of 1002 procedures. Acta Neurochir 161, 1623–1632 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03978-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03978-2

Keywords

Navigation