Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intravestibular and intracochlear schwannomas

  • Original Article - Functional Neurosurgery - Other
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Schwannomas of the VIIIth cranial nerve are benign tumours, with vast majority occurring in vestibular division. Rarely, they can also arise from distal branches of cochlear, superior or inferior vestibular. We review our experience with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKR), as first intention treatment for intracochlear (ICS) and intravestibular (IVS) schwannomas.

Methods

A total number of five patients were analysed, treated over 8 years, between June 2010 and September 2018, with Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion or Icon (Elekta Instruments, AB, Sweden). The marginal dose prescribed was 12 Gy at a mean prescription isodose line of 61.4% (range 50–70). Clinical evaluation included auditory and facial function.

Results

The mean age was 49.9 (range 34–63). The mean follow-up period was 52.8 months (range 12–84). The mean target volume (TV) was 0.087 ml (range 0.014–0.281). The mean maximal dose received by the cochlea was 11.2 Gy (range 2.6–20.3). The mean marginal dose received by the vestibule (e.g. utricula) was 14.2 Gy (range 3.8–17.5). No patient experienced an acute or subacute clinical adverse radiation effect after GKR. Four cases had overall symptom stability. In one patient (1/5), the vertigo, which was the main clinical complain, disappeared 1 year after GKR. However, it reappeared 3 years later, with same pretherapeutic characteristics and is currently fluctuating. One patient experienced hearing decrease after GKR, during the first 12 months. This case received 11.2 Gy to the cochlea. Follow-up MRI course showed a decrease in size in four patients, and stability in one.

Conclusions

Gamma Knife radiosurgery is a valuable first intention treatment for ICS or IVS, in selected cases. Special attention should be paid for the dose delivered to the cochlea and the vestibular apparatus. Acute and subacute clinical effects are exceptional, while tumour control was achieved in all cases in our small series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bittencourt AG, Alves RD, Ikari LS, Burke PR, Gebrim EM, Bento RF (2014) Intracochlear schwannoma: diagnosis and management. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 18:322–324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Lella F, Dispenza F, De Stefano A, Falcioni M, Sanna M (2007) Management of intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Auris Nasus Larynx 34:459–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gardner G, Robertson JH (1988) Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 97:55–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gosselin E, Maniakas A, Saliba I (2016) Meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes in patients with intralabyrinthine schwannomas: conservative management vs. microsurgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:1357–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grayeli AB, Fond C, Kalamarides M, Bouccara D, Cazals-Hatem D, Cyna-Gorse F, Sterkers O (2007) Diagnosis and management of intracochlear schwannomas. Otol Neurotol 28:951–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Green JD Jr, McKenzie JD (1999) Diagnosis and management of intralabyrinthine schwannomas. Laryngoscope 109:1626–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamed A, Linthicum FH Jr (2005) Intralabyrinthine schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 26:1085–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayashi M, Chernov M, Tamura N, Izawa M, Muragaki Y, Iseki H, Okada Y, Takakura K (2011) Gamma knife robotic microradiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas: tumor shrinkage may depend on the amount of radiation energy delivered per lesion volume (unit energy). Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 89:6–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayashi M, Ochiai T, Nakaya K, Chernov M, Tamura N, Yomo S, Izawa M, Hori T, Takakura K, Regis J (2006) Image-guided microradiosurgery for skull base tumors: advantages of using gadolinium-enhanced constructive interference in steady-state imaging. J Neurosurg 105(Suppl):12–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoshino T, Ishii D (1972) Intralabyrinthine neurilemmoma. Histopathol Rep ORL 34:117–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 93:146–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy RJ, Shelton C, Salzman KL, Davidson HC, Harnsberger HR (2004) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: diagnosis, management, and a new classification system. Otol Neurotol 25:160–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Massager N, Drogba L, Delbrouck C, Benmebarek N, Desmedt F, Devriendt D (2011) Gamma knife radiosurgery for intralabyrinthine schwannomas. J Radiosurg SBRT 1:237–245

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Massager N, Nissim O, Delbrouck C, Delpierre I, Devriendt D, Desmedt F, Wikler D, Brotchi J, Levivier M (2007) Irradiation of cochlear structures during vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery and associated hearing outcome. J Neurosurg 107:733–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller ME, Moriarty JM, Linetsky M, Lai C, Ishiyama A (2012) Intracochlear schwannoma presenting as diffuse cochlear enhancement: diagnostic challenges of a rare cause of deafness. Ir J Med Sci 181:131–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Plontke SK, Rahne T, Pfister M, Gotze G, Heider C, Pazaitis N, Strauss C, Caye-Thomasen P, Kosling S (2017) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas : surgical management and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants. Hno 65:136–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Salzman KL, Childs AM, Davidson HC, Kennedy RJ, Shelton C, Harnsberger HR (2012) Intralabyrinthine schwannomas: imaging diagnosis and classification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:104–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin YR, Choi SJ, Park K, Choung YH (2009) Intralabyrinthine schwannoma involving the cochlea, vestibule, and internal auditory canal: ‘canalolabyrinthine schwannoma’. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:143–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamura M, Carron R, Yomo S, Arkha Y, Muraciolle X, Porcheron D, Thomassin JM, Roche PH, Regis J (2009) Hearing preservation after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas presenting with high-level hearing. Neurosurgery 64:289–296 discussion 296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsao MN, Sahgal A, Xu W, De Salles A, Hayashi M, Levivier M, Ma L, Martinez R, Regis J, Ryu S, Slotman BJ, Paddick I (2017) Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guideline. J Radiosurg SBRT 5:5–24

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tuleasca C, George M, Faouzi M, Schiappacasse L, Leroy HA, Zeverino M, Daniel RT, Maire R, Levivier M (2016) Acute clinical adverse radiation effects after gamma knife surgery for vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 125:73–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuleasca C, Levivier M (2018) A virtual musician quartet with vestibular schwannoma. Lancet Oncol 19:1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshida T, Sone M, Naganawa S, Nakashima T (2011) Accuracy of 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of intracochlear schwannoma. Auris Nasus Larynx 38:551–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu AF, McKinnon BJ (2012) Transcanal surgical excision of an intracochlear schwannoma. Am J Otolaryngol 33:779–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Lausanne University Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantin Tuleasca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Inform consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Functional Neurosurgery - Other

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tuleasca, C., George, M., Schiappacasse, L. et al. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intravestibular and intracochlear schwannomas. Acta Neurochir 161, 63–67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3762-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3762-y

Keywords

Navigation