Skip to main content

Reader comments to media reports on psychiatric neurosurgery: past history casts shadows on the future

Acta Neurochirurgica volume 160, pages 2501–2507 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Comments made by readers in response to news articles about current events can provide profound insights into public understanding of and perspectives on those events. Here, in follow up to a paper published last year in this journal, we examined reader comments to articles in newspapers and magazines about neurosurgical interventions for treating psychiatric illness.

Method

We conducted a thematic analysis of these comments (N = 662 coded units of data) posted in response to 115 newspaper and magazine articles from four countries (Canada, USA, Germany, and Spain) between 2006 and 2017. The comments were coded using an iteratively refined coding scheme that was structured around four a priori categories based on results from the parent study and two new categories that emerged.

Results

We found many references to historical psychosurgery and mostly negative and pessimistic comments about ablative neurosurgical interventions. Comments to deep brain stimulation were more positive, and comments to optogenetics most controversial. We also found many expressions of distrust of medical professionals in the context of interventions on the brain and concerns about social and individual control.

Conclusions

Overall, results suggest there is still much work to be done to raise public awareness about re-emerging and new neurosurgical interventions. Balanced discussion is needed if these approaches are to find a place in health care for psychiatric disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Abdullah T, Brown TL (2011) Mental illness stigma and ethnocultural beliefs, values, and norms: an integrative review. Clin Psychol Rev 31(6):934–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer MW (2005) Public perceptions and mass media in the biotechnology controversy. Int J Public Opinion Res 17(1):5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabrera LY, Reiner PB (2015) Understanding public (mis)understanding of tDCS for enhancement. Frontiers in integrative Neuroscience 9 (art 30)

  5. Cabrera LY, Bittlinger M, Lou H, Müller S, Illes J (2018) The re-emergence of psychiatric neurosurgery: insights from a cross-national study of newspaper and magazine coverage. Acta Neurochir 17(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chi MT (1997) Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. J Learn Sci 6(3):271–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Craig DA (2011) Ethical language and themes in news coverage of genetic testing. J Mass Commun Q 77(1):160–174

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diefenbach GJ, Diefenbach D, Baumeister A, West M (1999) Portrayal of lobotomy in the popular press: 1935-1960. J Hist Neurosci 8(1):60–69

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. European Commission (2013) Eurobarometer: responsible research and innovation (RRI), Science and Technology http://eceuropaeu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_401_enpdf Accessed 24 January 2018

  10. Faridani S, Bitton E, Ryokai K, Goldberg K (2010) Opinion space: a scalable tool for browsing online comments. In: CHI '10, ACM press. ACM press, New York, New York, USA, p 1175

  11. Gilbert F, Ovadia D (2011) Deep brain stimulation in the media: over-optimistic portrayals call for a new strategy involving journalists and scientists in ethical debates. Frontiers in integrative Neuroscience 5 (Art 16)

  12. Happer C, Philo G (2013) The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change. J Soc Polit Psych 1(1):321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henrich N, Holmes B (2011) What the public was saying about the H1N1 vaccine: perceptions and issues discussed in on-line comments during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One 6(4):e18479–e18412

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lauber C, Nordt C, Falcato L, Rössler W (2005) Can a seizure help? The public’s attitude toward electroconvulsive therapy. Psychiatry Res 134(2):205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller S, Riedmüller R, van Oosterhout A (2015) Rivaling paradigms in psychiatric neurosurgery: adjustability versus quick fix versus minimal-invasiveness. Front Integr Neurosci 9(214):165

  16. Nuttin BJ, Cosyns P, Demeulemeester H, Gybels J (1999) Electrical stimulation in anterior limbs of internal capsules in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Lancet 354(9189):1526

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nuttin BJ, Gybels J, Cosyns P, Gabriels L, al E (2002) Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders. Neurosurgery 5(12):519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pressman JD (1998) Last resort. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Racine E, Waldman S, Palmour N, Risse D, Illes J (2007) “Currents of hope”: neurostimulation techniques in U.S. and U.K. print media. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 16(03):312–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Regan Á, Shan L, McConnon Á, Marcu A, Raats M, Wall P, Barnett J (2014) Strategies for dismissing dietary risks: insights from user-generated comments online. Health Risk Soc 16(4):308–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rössler W, Salize HJ (1995) Factors affecting public attitudes towards mental health care. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 245(1):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schläpfer TE, Fins JJ (2010) Deep brain stimulation and the neuroethics of responsible publishing. JAMA 303:775–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schläpfer TE, Lisanby SH, Pallanti S (2010) Separating hope from hype: some ethical implications of the development of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric research and treatment. Brain Stimul 15(5):285–287

    Google Scholar 

  24. Valenstein ES (1986) Great and desperate cures. Basic Books (AZ), Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weiner RD, Reti IM (2017) Key updates in the clinical application of electroconvulsive therapy. Int Rev Psychiatry 29(2):54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Westerman D, Spence PR, Van Der Heide B (2013) Social media as information source: recency of updates and credibility of information. J Comput-Mediat Commun 19(2):171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization (2016) Investing in treatment for depression and anxiety leads to fourfold return. In: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2016/depression-anxiety-treatment/en/. Accessed 24 Jan 2018

  28. Wright KB (2005) Researching internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. J Comput-Mediat Commun 10(3):1–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the support from members of the ERA-NET NEURON psychiatric neurosurgery team, and Caitlin Courchesne (Neuroethics Canada) for the thoughtful comments on previous drafts.

Funding

ERA-NET NEURON Team Grant: Ethical, Legal and Social (ELS) Issues #ERN-144241 (JI) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (01GP1621A) (SM). The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Department of Translational Science and Molecular Medicine, Michigan State University, East Fee Hall, 965 Wilson Road, Rm C211, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Laura Y. Cabrera

  2. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, CCM, Division of Mind and Brain Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany

    Merlin Bittlinger & Sabine Müller

  3. Neuroethics Canada, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Hayami Lou

  4. Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics, Neuroethics Canada, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Koerner S124, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada

    Judy Illes

Authors
  1. Laura Y. Cabrera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Merlin Bittlinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hayami Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabine Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Judy Illes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judy Illes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Functional Neurosurgery - Other

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabrera, L.Y., Bittlinger, M., Lou, H. et al. Reader comments to media reports on psychiatric neurosurgery: past history casts shadows on the future. Acta Neurochir 160, 2501–2507 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3696-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3696-4

Keywords

  • Psychiatric neurosurgery
  • Neuroethics
  • Public perceptions