Effect of spinal anterior root stimulation and sacral deafferentation on bladder and sexual dysfunction in spinal cord injury
- 127 Downloads
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a highly devastating injury with a variety of complications; among them are neurogenic bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. We aimed to evaluate the effect of sacral anterior root stimulation with sacral deafferentation (SARS-SDAF) on neurogenic bladder and sexual dysfunction in a large well-defined spinal cord injury cohort.
In the manner of cross-sectional study, subjects undergone SARS-SDAF between September 1986 and July 2011 answered a questionnaire concerning conditions before and after surgery in the department of Neuro-Urology, Bad Wildungen, Germany.
In total 287 of 587 subjects were analyzed. Median age was 49 years (range 19–80), median time from SCI to surgery was 10 years (range 0–49), and from surgery to follow-up 13 years (range 1–25). Of the analyzed subjects, 100% of both gender used SARS for bladder emptying. On the visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 (best), satisfaction with SARS-SDAF was 10 concerning bladder emptying, however 5 and 8 regarding sexual performance, for female and male users, respectively. Baseline and follow-up comparison showed a decline in self-intermittent catheterization (p < 0.0001), partial catheterization by attendant (p = 0.0125), complete catheterization and suprapubic catheterization (p < 0.0001), transurethral catheterization (p < 0.0011), and fewer cases of involuntary urine leakage (p < 0.0001).
The SARS-SDAF is a beneficial multi-potential treatment method with simultaneous positive effect on multi-organ dysfunction among SCI subjects.
KeywordsSpinal cord injury Spinal anterior root stimulation Neurogenic bladder Bladder rehabilitation Spinal deafferentation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (name of institute/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 5.Brose SW, Bourbeau DJ, Gustafson KJ (2017) Genital nerve stimulation is tolerable and effective for bladder inhibition in sensate individuals with incomplete SCI. J Spinal Cord Med 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2017.1279817
- 8.Emmons RR, Garber CE, Cirnigliaro CM, Kirshblum SC, Spungen AM, Bauman WA (2011) Assessment of measures for abdominal adiposity in persons with spinal cord injury. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:734–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.02.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Huang Q, Oya H, Flouty OE, Reddy CG, Howard MA 3rd, Gillies GT, Utz M (2014) Comparison of spinal cord stimulation profiles from intra- and extradural electrode arrangements by finite element modelling. Med Biol Eng Comput 52:531–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-014-1157-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Krasmik D, Krebs J, van Ophoven A, Pannek J (2014) Urodynamic results, clinical efficacy, and complication rates of sacral intradural deafferentation and sacral anterior root stimulation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction resulting from complete spinal cord injury. Neurourol Urodyn 33:1202–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22486 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kutzenberger J (2007) Surgical therapy of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (hyperreflexia) in paraplegic patients by sacral deafferentation and implant driven micturition by sacral anterior root stimulation: methods, indications, results, complications, and future prospects. Acta Neurochir Suppl 97:333–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Vastenholt JM, Snoek GJ, Buschman HP, van der Aa HE, Alleman ER, Ijzerman MJ (2003) A 7-year follow-up of sacral anterior root stimulation for bladder control in patients with a spinal cord injury: quality of life and users’ experiences. Spinal Cord 41:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101465 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar