Glioma surgery with intraoperative mapping—balancing the onco-functional choice
- 143 Downloads
Balancing survival versus risk of inducing functional deficits is a challenge when resecting gliomas in or near eloquent areas. Our objectives were to assess deficits prior to and at 6 and 12 months after awake craniotomies with cortical and subcortical mapping in patients with suspected grade 2 gliomas in eloquent areas. We analyzed whether pre- and intraoperative factors were linked to an increased risk of postoperative deficits.
Retrospective study of 92 consecutive patients operated between January 2010 and June 2014. All deficits reported by any healthcare professional and KPS-score preoperatively, immediately postoperatively (day 1–10), at 6 months and 12 months, were analyzed.
A decrease in neurological and or cognitive function was common in the first days after surgery, with a significant improvement at 6 months after surgery and further improvement at 12 months. Immediately after surgery, 33% of the patients had severe deficits compared to 2% prior to surgery; this improved to 9% at 6 months and 3% at 12 months. However, at 12 months, 18% of the patients had new or worsened minor or moderate deficits and only 10% had no deficits compared to 39% prior to surgery. There were only minor changes in KPS. None of the recorded pre/intraoperative factors were found significantly to influence the risk of moderate/severe late postoperative deficits.
A significant amount of the patients in this study experienced new or worsened neurological and or cognitive deficits during follow-up. We found a higher frequency of deficits than normally reported. This is due to the inclusion of mild deficits, the use of patient-reported data, and our focus on cognitive deficits. Our study indicates that the impact of awake craniotomy with mapping on patient outcome is larger than expected. This in no way negates the use of the technique.
KeywordsGlioma Neurosurgery Brain mapping Awake craniotomy
Thank you to the following people who have helped in gathering and analyzing the data presented in this article: Almdal K, Grøndal O, Johannsen M, and Azam A.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 3.Bello L, Gallucci M, Fava M, Carrabba G, Giussani C, Acerbi F, Baratta P, Songa V, Conte V, Branca V, Stocchetti N, Papagno C, Gaini SM (2007) Intraoperative subcortical language tract mapping guides surgical removal of gliomas involving speech areas. Neurosurgery 60(1):67–80 discussion 80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ius T, Isola M, Budai R, Pauletto G, Tomasino B, Fadiga L, Skrap M (2012) Low-grade glioma surgery in eloquent areas: volumetric analysis of extent of resection and its impact on overall survival. A single-institution experience in 190 patients. J Neurosurg 117(6):1039–1052CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Jakola AS, Unsgard G, Myrmel KS, Kloster R, Torp SH, Lindal S, Solheim O (2012) Low grade gliomas in eloquent locations - implications for surgical strategy, survival and long term quality of life. PLoS One 7(12):e51450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051450 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Pessina F, Navarria P, Cozzi L, Ascolese AM, Simonelli M, Santoro A, Tomatis S, Riva M, Fava E, Scorsetti M, Bello L (2016) Value of surgical resection in patients with newly diagnosed grade III glioma treated in a multimodal approach: surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 23(9):3040–3046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Pignatti F, van den Bent M, Curran D, Debruyne C, Sylvester R, Therasse P, Afra D, Cornu P, Bolla M, Vecht C, Karim AB, European OFRATOCBTCG, European OFRATOCRCG (2002) Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with cerebral low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol 20(8):2076–2084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.van den Bent MJ, Wefel JS, Schiff D, Taphoorn MJ, Jaeckle K, Junck L, Armstrong T, Choucair A, Waldman AD, Gorlia T, Chamberlain M, Baumert BG, Vogelbaum MA, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Wen PY, Chang SM, Jacobs AH (2011) Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Lancet Oncol 12(6):583–593CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar