Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Completion of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for AVM treatment after unplanned interruption—technical note

  • Technical Note - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and importance

Gamma Knife radiosurgery is an established technique for non-urgent treatment of various intracranial pathologies. Intra-procedural dislodgement of the stereotactic frame is an uncommon occurrence that could lead to abortion of ongoing treatment and necessitate more invasive treatment strategies.

Clinical presentation

In this case report, we describe a novel method for resumption of Gamma Knife treatment after an unplanned intra-procedural interruption. The case example involves a radiosurgical treatment of a Spetzler-Martin grade I arteriovenous malformation.

Conclusion

Our technique involves integration of scans and coordinate systems from two imaging sessions using the composite isodose line to resolve translational differences, thereby limiting delivery of remaining shots to the untreated region of the lesion. MRI follow-up at 13 months showed a reduction in the nidus size with no evidence of any radiation injury to the surrounding brain parenchyma. We believe this technique will allow care teams to effectively salvage interrupted Gamma Knife procedures and reduce progression to more invasive treatment options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Halim AX, Johnston SC, Singh V, McCulloch CE, Bennett JP, Achrol AS, Sidney S, Young WL (2004) Longitudinal risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with arteriovenous malformation of the brain within a defined population. Stroke 35:1697–1702. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000130988.44824.29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim EJ, Vermeulen S, Li FJ, Newell DW (2014) A review of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery. Transl Cancer Res 3:399–410

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mohr JP, Parides MK, Stapf C, Moquete E, Moy CS, Overbey JR, Salman RA-S, Vicaut E, Young WL, Houdart E, Cordonnier C, Stefani MA, Hartmann A, von Kummer R, Biondi A, Berkefeld J, Klijn CJM, Harkness K, Libman R, Barreau X, Moskowitz AJ (2014) Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet 383:614–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62302-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Monteith SJ, Yen CP, Sheehan JP (2011) Gamma knife surgery for pediatric arteriovenous malformations: a review. Clin Neurosurg 58:126–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ondra SL, Troupp H, George ED, Schwab K (1990) The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24-year follow-up assessment. J Neurosurg 73:387–391. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1990.73.3.0387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stapf C, Mast H, Sciacca RR, Choi JH, Khaw AV, Connolly ES, Pile-Spellman J, Mohr JP (2006) Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 66:1350–1355. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000210524.68507.87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Connolly ES (2013) A randomized trial of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 73:N13–N15. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000435114.33768.e3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Hwang BY, Fischer LE, Otten ML, Merkow MB, Garrett MC, Isaacson SR, Connolly ES Jr (2008) A comprehensive review of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: outcomes, predictive factors, and grading scales. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1159/000126945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vachhrajani S, Fawaz C, Mathieu D, Menard C, Cusimano MD, Gentili F, Hodaie M, Kenny B, Kulkarni AV, Laperriere N, Schwartz M, Tsao M, Bernstein M (2008) Complications of Gamma Knife surgery: an early report from 2 Canadian centers. J Neurosurg 109:Suppl 2–Suppl 7. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns/2008/109/12/s2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory J. Zipfel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of their treatment course.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raman, H.S., Santanam, L., Vellimana, A.K. et al. Completion of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for AVM treatment after unplanned interruption—technical note. Acta Neurochir 160, 1343–1347 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3493-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3493-0

Keywords

Navigation