Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurointerventional procedures

  • Original Article - Vascular
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Operating rooms account for 70% of hospital waste, increasing healthcare costs and creating environmental hazards. Endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular pathologies has become prominent, and associated products highly impact the total cost of care. We investigated the costs of endovascular surgical waste at our institution.

Methods

Data from 53 consecutive endovascular procedures at the Radboud UMC Nijmegen from May to December 2016 were collected. “Unused disposable supply” was defined as one-time use items opened but not used during the procedure. Two observers cataloged the unused disposable supply for each case. The cost of each item was determined from the center supply catalog, and these costs were summed to determine the total cost of unused supply per case.

Results

Thirteen diagnostic cerebral digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) (24.5%) and 40 endovascular procedures (75.5%) were analyzed. Total interventional waste was 27,299.53 € (mean 515.09 € per procedure). While total costs of unused disposable supply were almost irrelevant for DSAs, they were consistent for interventional procedures (mean 676.49 € per case). Aneurysm standard coiling had the highest impact on total interventional waste (mean 1061.55 €). Disposable interventional products had a very high impact on the surgical waste costs in the series of the neurointerventional procedures (95% of total waste).

Conclusions

This study shows the impact of neurointerventional waste on the total care costs for cerebrovascular patients. This might reflect the tendency to anticipate needs and emergencies in neurointervention. Responsible use of disposable material can be achieved by educating operators and nurses and creating operator preference cards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert MG, Rothkopf DM (2015) Operating room waste reduction in plastic and hand surgery. Plast Surg (Oakv) 23(4):235–238

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ast MP, Mayman DJ, Su EP, Gonzalez Della Valle AM, Parks ML, Haas SB (2014) The reduction of implant-related errors and waste in total knee arthroplasty using a novel, computer based, e.Label and compatibility system. J Arthroplast 29(1):132–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atcheson CL, Spivack J, Williams R, Bryson EO (2016) Preventable drug waste among anesthesia providers: opportunities for efficiency. J Clin Anesth 30:24–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Vries J, Boogarts HD (2014) Treatment of patients with ruptured aneurysm by neurosurgeons that perform both open surgical and endovascular techniques is safe and effective: results of a single centre in Europe. Acta Neurochir 156(7):1259–1266 discussion 1266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Payne A, Slover J, Inneh I, Hutzler L, Iorio R, Bosco JA 3rd (2015) Orthopedic implant waste: analysis and quantification. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 44(12):554–560

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sorkin GC, Dumont TM, Eller JL et al (2014) Cerebrovascular neurosurgery in evolution: the endovascular paradigm. Neurosurgery 74(Suppl 1):S191–S197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Soroceanu A, Canacari E, Brown E, Robinson A, McGuire KJ (2011) Intraoperative waste in spine surgery: incidence, cost, and effectiveness of an educational program. Spine 36(19):E1270–E1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zygourakis CC, Yoon S, Valencia V, Boscardin C, Moriates C, Gonzales R et al (2017) Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurosurgical procedures. J Neurosurg 126(2):620–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Rigante.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rigante, L., Moudrous, W., de Vries, J. et al. Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurointerventional procedures. Acta Neurochir 159, 2337–2340 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3366-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3366-y

Keywords

Navigation