Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elective ICP monitoring: how long is long enough?

  • Original Article - Brain Injury
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intracranial pressure monitoring is commonly undertaken to assess and manage acute patients following head injury. However, ICP monitoring can also be a useful diagnostic tool in the management of CSF dynamics in elective patients. To date, there is little published research to suggest how long these elective patients require ICP monitoring in order to gain an accurate picture of a patient’s ICP dynamics. At the author’s institution, a minimum of 48-h data collection is currently undertaken in patients with a suspected ICP abnormality.

Methods

A retrospective audit was undertaken comparing overall median ICP and overall median pulse amplitude data at three time points, 24 h, 48 h and total time analysed (if longer than 48 h). Paired T-test was used to assess if there were statistically significant differences between 24-h versus 48-h monitoring and total duration of monitoring. All patients admitted over a 6-month period for ICPM who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

Results

Eighteen patients met the criteria. Median age was 45.8 years, range 22–83 years, 12 female and 6 male. No complications were experienced as a result of ICPM. Diagnosis included NPH, IIH, suspected shunt malfunction and Chiari malformation. The results demonstrated that there is no statistical difference between 24 h and 48 h or longer for both overall median ICP and pulse amplitude.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate that ICP monitoring of elective adult patients using a Spiegelberg intraparenchymal bolt for 24 h gives an accurate picture of a patient’s ICP dynamics compared with longer periods of monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

ICP:

Intracranial pressure

ICPM:

Intracranial pressure monitoring

IIH:

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension

iNPH:

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

References

  1. Al-Tamimi YZ, Helmy A, Bavette S, Prive SJ (2009) Assessment of zero drift in the Codman intracranial pressure monitor: a study from 2 neurointensive care units. Neurosurgery 64(1):94–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allin D, Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z (2008) Laboratory testing of the Pressio intracranial pressure monitor. Neurosurgery 62:1158–1161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burrows G (1848) On disorders of the cerebral circulation and on the connection between affections of the brain and diseases of the heart. Lea & Blanchard, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cushing H (1926) The third circulation in studies in intracranial physiology and surgery. Oxford Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dimitriou J, Levivier M, Gugliotta M (2015) Comparison of complications in patients receiving different types of intracranial pressure monitoring: a retrospective study in single centre in Switzerland. World Neurosurg 89:641–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eide PK (2003) Quantitative analysis of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in symptomatic patients with extracranial shunts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:231–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Eide PK (2006) Intracranial pressure paramiters in indiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir 148:21–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2010) Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6 year review of 214 patients. Neurosurgery 66:80–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelabert-Gonzalez M, Ginesta-Galan V, Sernamito-Garcia R, Allut AG, Bandin-Dieguez J, Rumbo RM (2006) The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in 1000 cases. Acta Neurosur 148(4):435–441

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Horcajadas A, Roman A, Olivares G, Saura E, Jorques A, Cordero N, Ibanez B, Sanchez C, Roldan MA (2011) Usefulnes of IPC continuous monitoring in shunt dysfunction. Neurocirugia (Asturias, Spain) 22(4):310–323

  11. Lofgren J, von Essen C, Zwetnow NN (1973) The pressure-volume curve of the cerebrospinal fluid space in dogs. Acta Neurol Scand 49:557–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand 36(supplement 149):1–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mokri B (2001) The Monro-Kellie hypothesis. Neurology 56(12):1746–1748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Monro A (1783) Observations on structure and functions of the nervous system. Edinburgh, Creech and Johnson

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poca MA, Mataro M, Matarin M, Arikan F, Junque C, Sahuquillo J (2004) Is the placement of shunts in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus worth the risk? Results of a study based on continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 100:855–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Poca MA, Martinez-Ricarte F, Sahuquillo J, Lastra R, Torne R, Armengol MS (2008) Intracranial presaure monitoring with the Neurodur-P epidural sensor: a prospective study in patients with adult hydrocephalus or idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 108:934–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raboel PH, Bartek J Jr, Andersen M, Bellander BM, Romner B (2012) Intracranial pressure monitoring: invasive versus non-invasive methods—a review. Critical Care Research and Practice 2112:950393

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sæhle T, Eide PK (2015) Intracranial pressure monitoring in paediatric and adult patients with hydrocephalus and tentative shunt failure: a single centre experience over 10 years in 146 patients. J Neurosurg 122(5):1076–1086

  19. Smith M (2008) Monitoring intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg 106(1):204–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD (2010) Continuous intracranial pressure monitoring in pseudotumour cerebri: single centre experience. Br J Neurosurg 24(5):584–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Warden KF, Alizai AM, Trobe JD, Hoff JT (2011) Short-term continuous intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitoring in presumed idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 31(3):202–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhong J, Dujovny M, Park HK, Perez E, Perlin AR, Diaz FG (2003) Advances in ICP monitoring techniques. Neurol Res 25(4):339–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. D. Thompson.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thompson, S.D., Coutts, A., Craven, C.L. et al. Elective ICP monitoring: how long is long enough?. Acta Neurochir 159, 485–490 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-3074-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-3074-z

Keywords

Navigation