Abstract
Background
Intracranial pressure monitoring is commonly undertaken to assess and manage acute patients following head injury. However, ICP monitoring can also be a useful diagnostic tool in the management of CSF dynamics in elective patients. To date, there is little published research to suggest how long these elective patients require ICP monitoring in order to gain an accurate picture of a patient’s ICP dynamics. At the author’s institution, a minimum of 48-h data collection is currently undertaken in patients with a suspected ICP abnormality.
Methods
A retrospective audit was undertaken comparing overall median ICP and overall median pulse amplitude data at three time points, 24 h, 48 h and total time analysed (if longer than 48 h). Paired T-test was used to assess if there were statistically significant differences between 24-h versus 48-h monitoring and total duration of monitoring. All patients admitted over a 6-month period for ICPM who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.
Results
Eighteen patients met the criteria. Median age was 45.8 years, range 22–83 years, 12 female and 6 male. No complications were experienced as a result of ICPM. Diagnosis included NPH, IIH, suspected shunt malfunction and Chiari malformation. The results demonstrated that there is no statistical difference between 24 h and 48 h or longer for both overall median ICP and pulse amplitude.
Conclusion
The results of this study demonstrate that ICP monitoring of elective adult patients using a Spiegelberg intraparenchymal bolt for 24 h gives an accurate picture of a patient’s ICP dynamics compared with longer periods of monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- ICP:
-
Intracranial pressure
- ICPM:
-
Intracranial pressure monitoring
- IIH:
-
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- iNPH:
-
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
References
Al-Tamimi YZ, Helmy A, Bavette S, Prive SJ (2009) Assessment of zero drift in the Codman intracranial pressure monitor: a study from 2 neurointensive care units. Neurosurgery 64(1):94–98
Allin D, Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z (2008) Laboratory testing of the Pressio intracranial pressure monitor. Neurosurgery 62:1158–1161
Burrows G (1848) On disorders of the cerebral circulation and on the connection between affections of the brain and diseases of the heart. Lea & Blanchard, Philadelphia
Cushing H (1926) The third circulation in studies in intracranial physiology and surgery. Oxford Press, London
Dimitriou J, Levivier M, Gugliotta M (2015) Comparison of complications in patients receiving different types of intracranial pressure monitoring: a retrospective study in single centre in Switzerland. World Neurosurg 89:641–646
Eide PK (2003) Quantitative analysis of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in symptomatic patients with extracranial shunts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:231–237
Eide PK (2006) Intracranial pressure paramiters in indiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients treated with ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Acta Neurochir 148:21–29
Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2010) Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6 year review of 214 patients. Neurosurgery 66:80–91
Gelabert-Gonzalez M, Ginesta-Galan V, Sernamito-Garcia R, Allut AG, Bandin-Dieguez J, Rumbo RM (2006) The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Assessment in 1000 cases. Acta Neurosur 148(4):435–441
Horcajadas A, Roman A, Olivares G, Saura E, Jorques A, Cordero N, Ibanez B, Sanchez C, Roldan MA (2011) Usefulnes of IPC continuous monitoring in shunt dysfunction. Neurocirugia (Asturias, Spain) 22(4):310–323
Lofgren J, von Essen C, Zwetnow NN (1973) The pressure-volume curve of the cerebrospinal fluid space in dogs. Acta Neurol Scand 49:557–574
Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand 36(supplement 149):1–193
Mokri B (2001) The Monro-Kellie hypothesis. Neurology 56(12):1746–1748
Monro A (1783) Observations on structure and functions of the nervous system. Edinburgh, Creech and Johnson
Poca MA, Mataro M, Matarin M, Arikan F, Junque C, Sahuquillo J (2004) Is the placement of shunts in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus worth the risk? Results of a study based on continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 100:855–866
Poca MA, Martinez-Ricarte F, Sahuquillo J, Lastra R, Torne R, Armengol MS (2008) Intracranial presaure monitoring with the Neurodur-P epidural sensor: a prospective study in patients with adult hydrocephalus or idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 108:934–942
Raboel PH, Bartek J Jr, Andersen M, Bellander BM, Romner B (2012) Intracranial pressure monitoring: invasive versus non-invasive methods—a review. Critical Care Research and Practice 2112:950393
Sæhle T, Eide PK (2015) Intracranial pressure monitoring in paediatric and adult patients with hydrocephalus and tentative shunt failure: a single centre experience over 10 years in 146 patients. J Neurosurg 122(5):1076–1086
Smith M (2008) Monitoring intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg 106(1):204–208
Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD (2010) Continuous intracranial pressure monitoring in pseudotumour cerebri: single centre experience. Br J Neurosurg 24(5):584–588
Warden KF, Alizai AM, Trobe JD, Hoff JT (2011) Short-term continuous intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitoring in presumed idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuroophthalmol 31(3):202–205
Zhong J, Dujovny M, Park HK, Perez E, Perlin AR, Diaz FG (2003) Advances in ICP monitoring techniques. Neurol Res 25(4):339–350
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No funding was received for this research.
Conflict of interest
All authors certify they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical approval
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, S.D., Coutts, A., Craven, C.L. et al. Elective ICP monitoring: how long is long enough?. Acta Neurochir 159, 485–490 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-3074-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-3074-z