Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of bone fragments in nonmissile compound depressed skull fractures

  • Clinical Article - Brain Injury
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is no settled standard of care or even a consensus between neurosurgeons on the replacement of bone fragments in compound depressed skull fractures (CDSF).

Materials and methods

This cohort study retrospectively reviewed the patients with nonmissile CDSF who were admitted to our university hospitals from January 2010 to January 2015. Patients who were managed nonoperatively, polytrauma, comatose patients, and CDSF over the air sinuses were excluded from this study.

Results

This study includes 87 consecutive patients with nonmissile CDSF who were surgically treated from January 2010 to January 2015. Follow-up varied from 12 to 36 months. All of the 87 patients presented within 1 week after injury; 76 patients (87.35 %) had surgery within the first 72 h of trauma, and these patients had primary bone fragment replacement (after decontamination) with or without miniplates and minimesh. The patients who presented after 72 h of trauma with no wound discharge had their bone fragments autoclaved then replaced. The patients who presented after 72 h of trauma and had pus or serous discharge from the wound had their bone fragments discarded and scheduled for delayed cranioplasty. The long-term infection rate in all patients who had a primary bone fragment replacement in this study is 0 %.

Conclusions

Primary bone fragment replacement (after decontamination) is a safe option in the management of nonmissile CDSF within 72 h of trauma in selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akram M, Ahmed I, Qureshi NA, Bhatti SH, Ishfaq A (2007) Outcome of primary bone fragment replacement in compound depressed skull fractures. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 17(12):744–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blankenship JB, Chadduck WM, and Boop FA (1990–1991) Repair of compound depressed skull fractures in children with replacement of bone fragments. Pediatr Neurosurg 16 (6): 297–300

  3. Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, Servadei F, Walters BC, Wilberger J (2006) Surgical management of depressed cranial fractures. Neurosurgery 58(3 Suppl):S 56–60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heary RF, Hunt CD, Krieger AJ, Schulder M, Vaid C (1993) Nonsurgical treatment of compound depressed skull fractures. J Trauma 35(3):441–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jennett B, Miller JD (1972) Infection after depressed fracture of skull. Implications for management of nonmissile injuries. J Neurosurg 36(3):333–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kriss FC, Taren JA, Kahn EA (1969) Primary repair of compound skull fractures by replacement of bone fragments. J Neurosurg 30(6):698–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marbacher S, Andres RH, Fathi AR, Fandino J (2008) Primary reconstruction of open depressed skull fractures with titanium mesh. J Craniofac Surg 19(2):490–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nayak PK, Mahapatra AK (2007) Primary reconstruction of depressed skull fracture—the changing scenario. IJNT 5:35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nnadi MO, Bankole OB, Arigbabu SO (2014) Outcome of surgically treated non-missile traumatic depressed skull fracture. Niger Postgrad Med J 21(4):311–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nnadi MON, Bankole OB, Olatosi JO, Edentekhe TA, Fente BG (2015) Outcome of primary bone replacement in depressed skull fractures: a prospective study. J Med Sci Technol 4(3):216–222

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rehman L, Ghani E, Hussain A, Shah A, Noman MA, Khaleeq-Uz-Zaman (2007) Infection in compound depressed fracture of the skull. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 17(3):140–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shokunbi MT, Komolafe EO, Malomo AO, Amanor-Boadu DS, Sanusi A, Olumide AA, Adeloye A (2000) Scalp closure without fracture elevation does not reduce the risk of infection in patients with compound depressed skull fractures. Afr J Med Med Sci 29(3–4):293–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wylen EL, Willis BK, Nanda A (1999) Infection rate with replacement of bone fragment in compound depressed skull fractures. Surg Neurol 51(4):452–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed AbdelRahman AbdelFatah.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

The author certifies that he has no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest ( such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership; employment; consultancies; stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest ( such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

As this is a retrospective study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AbdelFatah, M.A. Management of bone fragments in nonmissile compound depressed skull fractures. Acta Neurochir 158, 2341–2345 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2976-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2976-0

Keywords

Navigation