Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resective surgery combined with corpus callosotomy for children with non-focal lesional Lennox–Gastaut syndrome

  • Clinical Article - Functional
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The first prospective trial for resective surgery combined with corpus callosotomy (CCT) was performed to investigate the outcomes of the combined surgery in children with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) without focal lesion on brain MRI.

Methods

This study enrolled 68 children with LGS and without focal lesion on brain MRI, of which 25 received medicine (medicine group) and 43 underwent surgery (surgery group), including 20 with exclusively resective surgery (exclusively resection subgroup) and 23 with resective surgery combined with CCT (combined CCT subgroup). All patients were followed for 3–5 years.

Results

Significant differences in seizure control were observed between the medicine group and the exclusively resection subgroup and combined CCT subgroup at the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-ups. There was a trend that the children with resection combined with CCT had better seizure control than those with exclusively resection at the three follow-ups, but this could not be verified by the statistical method used. Furthermore, significant differences were not observed in seizure control between children with different MRI findings, age at surgery, or pathology in the surgery group. The percentage of long-term seizure-free did not remain as high as the percentage of early stage seizure-free at 1-year follow-up. However, the children with combined CCT surgery demonstrated more postoperative improvement than the children with resective surgery alone based on the mean QOL score (10.78 vs. 5.75, p = 0.0152) and full-scale IQ (7.91 vs. 4.55, p = 0.0446).

Conclusions

Resective surgery combined with CCT can provide favorable seizure control and obvious improvements in QOL and IQ in children with LGS. This combined approach can be performed in carefully selected LGS children without focal lesions and can localize the epileptogenic zone following a comprehensive preoperative evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archer JS, Warren AEL, Stagnitti MR, Masterton RAJ, Abbott DF, Jackson GD (2014) Lennox–Gastaut syndrome and phenotype: secondary network epilepsies. Epilepsia 55:1245–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crumrine PK (2011) Management of seizures in Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. Paediatr Drugs 13:107–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Douglass LM, Salpekar J (2014) Surgical options for patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia 55:18–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hur YJ, Kang HC, Kim DS, Choi SR, Kim HD, Lee JS (2011) Uncovered primary seizure foci in Lennox–Gastaut syndrome after corpus callosotomy. Brain Dev 33:672–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kayyali HR, Abdelmoity A, Baeesa S (2013) The role of epilepsy surgery in the treatment of childhood epileptic encephalopathy. Epilepsy Res Treat 2013:983049

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JY, Kang HC, Cho JH, Lee JH, Kim HD, Im CH (2014) Combined use of multiple computational intracranial EEG analysis techniques for the localization of epileptogenic zones in Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. Clin EEG Neurosci 45:169–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kossoff EW, Shields WD (2014) Nonpharmacologic care for patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: ketogenic diets and vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia 55:29–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lancman J, Virk M, Shao H, Mazumdar M, Greenfield GP, Weinstein S, Schwartz TH (2013) Vagus nerve stimulation vs. corpus callosotomy in the treatment of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: a meta-analysis. Seizure 22:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee YJ, Kang HC, Lee JS, Kim SH, Kim DS, Shim KW, Lee YH, Kim TS, Kim HD (2010) Resective pediatric epilepsy surgery in Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. Pediatrics 125:e58–e66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang SL, Li AM, Zhao M, Jiang H, Meng XL, Sun YJ (2010) Combined anterior corpus callosotomy in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and mental retardation. Seizure 19:330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang SL, Zhang S, Hu X, Zhang Z, Fu X, Jiang H, Yu XM (2014) Anterior corpus callosotomy in school-aged children with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome: a prospective study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 18:670–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu SY, An N, Fang X, Singh P, Oommen J, Yin Q, Yang MH, Liu Y, Liao W, Gao CQ, Yang H (2012) Surgical treatment of patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome phenotype. Sci World J 2012:614263

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baldeweg T, Skirrow C (2015) Long-term cognitive outcomes after epilepsy surgery in children. In: Malmgren K, Baxendale S, Cross JH (eds) Long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children. Springer, New York, pp 85–102

  14. Montouris GD (2011) Rational approach to treatment options for Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia 52:10–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ng YT, Hastriter EV, Wethe J, Chapman KE, Prenger EC, Prigatano GP, Oppenheim T, Varland M, Rekate HL, Kerrigan JF (2011) Surgical resection of hypothalamic hamartomas for severe behavioral symptoms. Epilepsy Behav 20:75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park SY, Kwon HE, Kang HC, Lee JS, Kim DS, Kim HD (2013) Epilepsy surgery in pediatric intractable epilepsy with destructive encephalopathy. J Epilepsy Res 3:48–53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. You SJ, Lee JK, Ko TS (2007) Epilepsy surgery in a patient with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome and cortical dysplasia. Brain Dev 29:167–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vigevano F, Arzimanoglou A, Plouin P, Specchio N (2013) Therapeutic approach to epileptic encephalopathies. Epilepsia 54:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the patients and their families for their long-term cooperation. We also appreciate the contribution provided by the following persons: Dr. HB Kong, XP Wang, from the Neurosurgery Department; and Dr. SS Liang, Dr. N. Liu and all technicians in the Neurophysiologic Laboratory of Capital Epilepsy Therapy Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuli Liang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose. We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Funding

This research was funded by Beijing Technology & Science Nova Training Project (2010B084).

Ethical approval

This study was specifically approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, and all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All patients provided written informed consent prior to treatments.

Additional information

Comments

The authors present an impressive work in a prospective series of Lennox–Gastaut patients. They report on patients included from March 2004 to October 2009. They focus on the surgical group, finally including 43 patients. They were divided into one group of 20 children who underwent a focal resection determined by the presurgical epilepsy work-up, and another group of 23 children that in addition to the focal resection also underwent an anterior corpus callosotomy. They also report on 25 patients who were exclusively treated by AED, however not fully comparable with the surgical group. Even if they do not find statistically verifiable differences they report on a trend of better seizure outcomes in the combined group. They report for the total (n = 43) surgical group of patients rather good (regarding the Lennox–Gastaut syndrome) seizure outcomes; 69.8 % at 1 year, 60.5 % at 3 years, and 54.5 % at 5-year follow-up. The AED exclusive group had corresponding figures of 1, 0, and 0 %. However, the combined surgery group did perform better in full-scale IQ and overall QOL compared to the focal resection-only group. They also give individual details for each patient. This is a valuable addition to the literature, and it represents a work that is demanding, and requires a large epilepsy surgery program.

Bertil Rydenhag

Gothenburg, Sweden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, P., Liang, S., Zhang, S. et al. Resective surgery combined with corpus callosotomy for children with non-focal lesional Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. Acta Neurochir 158, 2177–2184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2947-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2947-5

Keywords

Navigation