Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Presurgical visualization of the neurovascular relationship in trigeminal neuralgia with 3D modeling using free Slicer software

  • Clinical Article - Neurosurgical Anatomy
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To explore whether segmentation and 3D modeling are more accurate in the preoperative detection of the neurovascular relationship (NVR) in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) compared to MRI fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA).

Method

Segmentation and 3D modeling using 3D Slicer were conducted for 40 patients undergoing MRI FIESTA and microsurgical vascular decompression (MVD). The NVR, as well as the offending vessel determined by MRI FIESTA and 3D Slicer, was reviewed and compared with intraoperative manifestations using SPSS.

Results

The k agreement between the MRI FIESTA and operation in determining the NVR was 0.232 and that between the 3D modeling and operation was 0.6333. There was no significant difference between these two procedures (χ2 = 8.09, P = 0.088). The k agreement between the MRI FIESTA and operation in determining the offending vessel was 0.373, and that between the 3D modeling and operation was 0.922. There were significant differences between two of them (χ2 = 82.01, P = 0.000). The sensitivity and specificity for MRI FIESTA in determining the NVR were 87.2 % and 100 %, respectively, and for 3D modeling were both 100 %.

Conclusion

The segmentation and 3D modeling were more accurate than MRI FIESTA in preoperative verification of the NVR and offending vessel. This was consistent with surgical manifestations and was more helpful for the preoperative decision and surgical plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Love S, Coakham HB (2001) Trigeminal neuralgia: pathology and pathogenesis. Brain 124:2346–2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barker FG 2nd, Janetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Larkins MV, Jho HD (1996) The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med 334:1077–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sindou M, Leston J, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2007) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. J Neurosurg 106(6):1144–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benes L, Shiratori K, Gurschi M, Sure U, Tirakotai W, Krischek B, Bertalanffy H (2005) Is preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging accurate in predicting neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia? A single-blind study. Neurosurg Rev 28(2):131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeng Q, Zhou Q, Liu Z, Li C, Ni S, Xue F (2013) Preoperative detection of the neurovascular relationship in trigeminal neuralgia using three-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). J Clin Neurosci 20(1):107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the Quan imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chun-Cheng Q, Qing-Shi Z, Ji-Qing Z, Zhi-Gang W (2009) A single-blinded pilot study assessing neurovascular contact by using high-resolution MR imaging inpatients with trigeminal neuralgia. Eur J Radiol 69:459–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ni S, Su W, Li X, Zeng Q, Liu Y, Zhu S, Wu C (2009) Enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient recalled MRI combined with magnetic resonance angiography for preoperative assessment of patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci 16:1555–1559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leal PR, Hermier M, Froment JC, Souza MA, Cristino-Filho G, Sindou M (2010) Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152(5):817–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vergani F, Panaretos P, Penalosa A, English P, Nicholson C, Jenkins A (2011) Preoperative MRI/MRA for microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia: consecutive series of 67 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153(12):2377–2381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chavhan GB, Babyn PS, Jankharia BG, Cheng HL, Shroff MM (2008) Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications. Radiographics 28:1147–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mikami T, Minamida Y, Yamaki T, Koyanagi I, Nonaka T, Houkin K (2005) Cranial nerve assessment in posteriorfossa tumors with fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA). Neurosurg Rev 28:261–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel NK, Aquilina K, Clarke Y, Renowden SA, Coakham HB (2003) How accurate ismagnetic resonance angiography in predicting neurovascular compression inpatientswith trigeminal neuralgia? A prospective, single-blinded comparativestudy. Br J Neurosurg 17(1):60–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Montano N, Conforti G, Di Bonaventura R, Meglio M, Fernandez E, Papacci F (2015) Advances in diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:289–299

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Satoh T, Onoda K, Date I (2007) Preoperative simulation for microvascualr decompression in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: visualization with three-dimensional magnetic cisternogram and angiogram fusion imaging. Neurosurgery 60:104–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu X-h, Chen X-l, Zhang J, Zheng Y, Sun G-c, Yu X-g, Xu B-n (2014) Comparison of the Tada formula with software slicer precise and Low-cost method for volume assessment of intracerebral hematoma. Stroke 45:3433–3435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenzoni J, Davidb P, Levivierc M (2012) Patterns of neurovascular compression in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia: a high-resolution MRI-based study. Eur J Radiol 81:1851–1857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Masur H, Papke K, Bongartz G, Vollbretcht K (1995) The significance of three-dimensional MR-defined neurovascular compression for the pathogenesis of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurol 242:93–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy EI, Jannetta PJ (2002) Microvascular decompression. In: Kim J, Burchiel (eds) Surgical management of pain. Thieme, New York, pp 878–886

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nakajima N, Jun W, Tamotsu M, Jo H, Nobuhiko H (2007) Surface rendering-based virtual intraventricular endoscopy: Retrospective feasibility study and comparison to volume rendering-based approach. Neuroimage 37(Suppl 1):S89–S99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Awaji M, Okamoto K, Nishiyama K (2007) Magnetic resonance cisternography for preoperative evaluation of arachnoid cysts. Neuroradiology 49(9):721–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Duffner F, Schiffbauer H, Glemser D, Skalej M, Freudenstein D (2003) Anatomy of the cerebral ventricular system for endoscopic neurosurgery: a magnetic resonance study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145(5):359–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tirakotai W, Tirakotai O, Sure U, Riegel T, Bertalanffy H, Hellwig D (2004) The evolution of stereotactic guidance in neuroendoscopy. Childs Nerv Syst 20(11-12):790–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-jun Hou.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Kai-wei Han, Dan-feng Zhang and Ji-gang Chen contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Kw., Zhang, Df., Chen, Jg. et al. Presurgical visualization of the neurovascular relationship in trigeminal neuralgia with 3D modeling using free Slicer software. Acta Neurochir 158, 2195–2201 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2936-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2936-8

Keywords

Navigation