Correlation of pain, functional impairment, and health-related quality of life with radiological grading scales of lumbar degenerative disc disease
- 833 Downloads
It is generally believed that radiological signs of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) are associated with increased pain and functional impairment as well as lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our aim was to assess the association of the Modic and Pfirrmann grading scales with established outcome questionnaires and the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test.
In a prospective two-center study with patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery, visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Roland-Morris Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index and HRQoL, as determined by the Short-Form (SF)-12 and the Euro-Qol, were recorded. Functional mobility was measured with the TUG test. Modic type (MOD) and Pfirrmann grade (PFI) of the affected lumbar segment were assessed with preoperative imaging. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the effect size of the relationship between clinical and radiological findings.
Two hundred eighty-four patients (mean age 58.5, 119 (42 %) females) were enrolled. None of the radiological grading scales were significantly associated with any of the subjective or objective clinical tests. There was a tendency for higher VAS back pain (3.48 vs. 4.14, p = 0.096) and lower SF-12 physical component scale (31.2 vs. 29.4, p = 0.065) in patients with high PFI (4–5) as compared to patients with low PFI (0–3). In the multivariate analysis, patients with MOD changes of the vertebral endplates were 100 % as likely as patients without changes to show an impaired TUG test performance (odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.56–1.80, p = 0.982). Patients with high PFI were 145 % as likely as those with low PFI to show an impaired TUG test performance (OR 1.45, 95 % CI 0.79–2.66, p = 0.230).
There was no association between established outcome questionnaires of symptom severity and two widely used radiological classifications in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar DDD.
KeywordsDegenerative disc disease Modic type Pfirrmann grade Timed-up-and-go test Functional mobility Low back pain Health-related quality of life
The authors thank Cornelia Lüthi (study nurse of the Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen) and Dario Jucker (medical student of the University of Zurich) for their important contribution in the collection of data that are reported in this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
No funding was received for this research.
Conflicts of interest
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Berg L, Hellum C, Gjertsen O, Neckelmann G, Johnsen LG, Storheim K, Brox JI, Eide GE, Espeland A, Norwegian Spine Study G (2013) Do more MRI findings imply worse disability or more intense low back pain? A cross-sectional study of candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis. Skelet Radiol 42:1593–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Gautschi OP, Corniola MV, Smoll NR, Joswig H, Schaller K, Hildebrandt G, Stienen MN (2015) Sex differences in subjective and objective measures of pain, functional impairment and health-related quality of life in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease. Pain in pressGoogle Scholar
- 9.Gautschi OP, Smoll NR, Corniola MV, Joswig H, Chau I, Hildebrandt G, Schaller K, Stienen MN (2015) Validity and reliability of a measurement of objective functional impairment in lumbar degenerative disc disease: the Timed-up-and-Go (TUG) test. Neurosurgery in pressGoogle Scholar
- 18.Vining RD, Potocki E, McLean I, Seidman M, Morgenthal AP, Boysen J, Goertz C (2014) Prevalence of radiographic findings in individuals with chronic low back pain screened for a randomized controlled trial: secondary analysis and clinical implications. J Manip Physiol Ther 37:678–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar