Skip to main content
Log in

Interobserver variability in the characterization of giant intracranial aneurysms with special emphasis on aneurysm diameter and shape

  • Clinical Article - Vascular
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Giant Intracranial Aneurysm Registry is a multicenter observational trial exclusively focusing on giant intracranial aneurysms (GIA). As no data exist on the interobserver variability in the radiological description of GIA, there is some uncertainty concerning the reliability of the GIA characteristics included in the registry. We have therefore designed a study to test the interobserver variability in the description of the specific GIA characteristics that are examined in the GIA registry.

Methods

Six different raters analyzed imaging of five GIA concerning GIA location, GIA size, GIA shape, GIA thrombosis, and the presence of perianeurysmal edema. Interobserver variability was examined using intraclass correlation and Fleiss’ kappa analysis.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.99 (95 % CI 0.97–1.0) for the largest GIA diameter and 0.98 (95 % CI 0.94–1.0) for the largest GIA diameter in an axial imaging slice. We found perfect interobserver agreement (Fleiss’ kappa 1.00) in the characterization of GIA location and the presence of perianeurysmal edema and almost perfect interobserver agreement for GIA thrombosis (Fleiss’ kappa 0.86, 95 % CI 0.63–1.00). Only moderate interobserver agreement was found in the description of GIA shape (Fleiss’ kappa 0.50, 95 % CI 0.27–0.73).

Conclusions

While GIA size, location, thrombosis, and the presence of perianeurysmal edema showed excellent interobserver agreement, the description of GIA shape was achieved with only moderate agreement. Data on GIA shape in multicenter studies, like the GIA registry, should therefore be discussed with caution and potentially reassessed in a centralized fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez H (2009) Etiology of giant aneurysms and their treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:E8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Backes D, Vergouwen MD, Velthuis BK, van der Schaaf IC, Bor AS, Algra A, Rinkel GJ (2014) Difference in aneurysm characteristics between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 45:1299–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baharoglu MI, Lauric A, Safain MG, Hippelheuser J, Wu C, Malek AM (2014) Widening and high inclination of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation are associated with presence of aneurysms. Stroke 45:2649–2655

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bor AS, Tiel Groenestege AT, terBrugge KG, Agid R, Velthuis BK, Rinkel GJ, Wermer MJ (2015) Clinical, radiological, and flow-related risk factors for growth of untreated, unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 46:42–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dengler J, Heuschmann PU, Endres M, Meyer B, Rohde V, Rufenacht DA, Vajkoczy P (2011) The rationale and design of the Giant Intracranial Aneurysm Registry: a retrospective and prospective study. Int J Stroke 6:266–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dengler J, Maldaner N, Bijlenga P, Burkhardt JK, Graewe A, Guhl S, Hong B, Hohaus C, Kursumovic A, Mielke D, Schebesch KM, Wostrack M, Rufenacht D, Vajkoczy P, Schmidt NO (2015) Perianeurysmal edema in giant intracranial aneurysms in relation to aneurysm location, size, and partial thrombosis. J Neurosurg. doi:10.3171/2014.10.JNS141560

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dengler J, Maldaner N, Bijlenga P, Burkhardt JK, Graewe A, Guhl S, Nakamura M, Hohaus C, Kursumovic A, Schmidt NO, Schebesch KM, Wostrack M, Vajkoczy P, Mielke D (2015) Quantifying unruptured giant intracranial aneurysms by measuring diameter and volume—a comparative analysis of 69 cases. Acta Neurochir 157:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dimmick S, Jones M, Steinfort B, Pines C, Faulder K (2009) Accuracy and interobserver reliability of three-dimensional rotational angiography versus mathematical models for volumetric measurement of intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 16:1195–1198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Forbes G, Fox AJ, Huston J 3rd, Wiebers DO, Torner J (1996) Interobserver variability in angiographic measurement and morphologic characterization of intracranial aneurysms: a report from the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1407–1415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Froesen J, Piippo A, Paetau A, Kangasniemi M, Niemelä M, Hernesniemi J, Jääskeläinen J (2004) Remodeling of saccular cerebral artery aneurysm wall is associated with rupture: histological analysis of 24 unruptured and 42 ruptured cases. Stroke 35:2287–2293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzalez NR, Duckwiler G, Jahan R, Murayama Y, Viñuela F (2008) Challenges in the endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 62(6 Suppl 3):1324–1335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, Morita A, Juvela S, Yonekura M, Ishibashi T, Torner JC, Nakayama T, Rinkel GJ, Algra A (2014) Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 13:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maldaner N, Guhl S, Mielke D, Musahl C, Schmidt NO, Wostrack M, Rüfenacht DA, Vajkoczy P, Dengler J (2015) Changes in volume of giant intracranial aneurysms treated by surgical strategies other than direct clipping. Acta Neurochir. doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2448-y

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rezek I, Lingineni RK, Sneade M, Molyneux AJ, Fox AJ, Kallmes DF (2014) Differences in the angiographic evaluation of coiled cerebral aneurysms between a core laboratory reader and operators: results of the Cerecyte Coil Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:124–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Suh SH, Cloft HJ, Huston J 3rd, Han KH, Kallmes DF (2014) Interobserver variability of aneurysm morphology: discrimination of the daughter sac. J Neurointerv Surg. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tulamo R, Frösen J, Hernesniemi J, Niemelä M (2010) Inflammatory changes in the aneurysm wall: a review. J Neurointerv Surg 2:120–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, Forbes GS, Thielen K, Nichols D, O’Fallon WM, Peacock J, Jaeger L, Kassell NF, Kongable-Beckman GL, Torner JC (2003) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 362:103–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Giant Intracranial Aneurysm Registry is funded by the Center for Stroke Research – Berlin.

Statement

All trials based on data from the Giant Intracranial Aneurysm Registry were approved by the ethics committees of all participating centers and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All patients included gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julius Dengler.

Additional information

No parts of this project have been presented anywhere before.

Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02066493.

Appendix

Appendix

Giant intracranial aneurysm study group members

Vajkoczy P, Maldaner N, Uebelacker A, Dengler J

Department of Neurosurgery, Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin

Endres M

Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin

Bohner G, Wiener E, Bauknecht HC

Department of Neuroradiology, Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin

Heuschmann PU, Malzahn U

Institute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg

Gläsker S, Zentner J, Van Velthoven V

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany

Guhl S, Schroeder HWS

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Greifswald, Germany

Strowitzki M

Department of Neurosurgery, Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany

Etminan N, Haengghi D, Eicker S, Turowski B

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Düsseldorf, Germany

Schebesch KM, Brawanski A

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg, Germany

Wrede K, Sure U

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Essen, Germany

Schmidt NO, Regelsberger J, Westphal M

Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Hamburg Eppendorf, Germany

Mielke D, Rohde V

Department of Neurosurgery, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany

Hosch H, Moskopp D

Department of Neurosurgery Vivantes-Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany

Joedicke A

Department of Neurosurgery Vivantes-Klinikum Neukoelln, Berlin, Germany

Hohaus C, Meisel HJ

Department of Neurosurgery, BG-Clinic Bergmannstrost, Halle, Germany.

Wostrack M, Meyer B, Lehmberg J

Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Germany

Musahl C, Hopf N

Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

Winkler G, Spetzger U

Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Germany

Graewe A, Meier U

Department of Neurosurgery, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Germany

Hong B, Nakamura M, Krauss J

Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

Grote A, Simon M, Schramm J

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Kursumovic A, Rath SA

Department of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Donau-Isar-Klinikum,

Deggendorf, Germany

Marbacher S, Fathi A, Fandino J

Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland,

Familiari P, Raco A

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Rome, Italy

BijlengaP, Schaller K

Service de Neurochirurgie, Faculté de Médecine de Genève and Hôpitaux Universitaire de Genève, Switzerland

Gruber A, Wang WT, Knosp E

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Hoffmann KT, Boxhammer E

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Rüfenacht DA

Department of Neuroradiology, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland

Boccardi E, Piano M

Department of Neuroradiology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milano, Italy

Niemelä M, Nurminen V, Lehecka M, Hernesniemi J

Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Burkhardt JK, Bozinov O, Regli L

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland

Shekhtman OD, Eliava SS

Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia

N Kato, Irie K, Nishimura K, Kaku S, Arakawa H, Yuki I, Ishibashi T, Murayama Y

Department of Neurosurgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Fiss I, Kombos T

Department of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Helios Klinikum Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany

Pedro MT, König R, Wirtz R

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Ulm, Germany

Helthuis J, van der Zwan A

Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Cognard C, Gawlitza M

Department of Neuroradiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wostrack, M., Mielke, D., Kato, N. et al. Interobserver variability in the characterization of giant intracranial aneurysms with special emphasis on aneurysm diameter and shape. Acta Neurochir 157, 1859–1865 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2587-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2587-1

Keywords

Navigation