Skip to main content
Log in

Optional real-time display of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in the microscopic field of view: avoiding communication failures in the operating room

  • Technical Note - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in neurosurgery has improved patient safety and outcomes. However, a pitfall in the use of IONM remains unsolved. Currently, there is no feasible way for surgeons to interpret IONM waves themselves during operations. Instead, they have to rely on verbal feedback from a neurophysiologist. This method is prone to communication failures, which can lead to delayed or false interpretation of the data. Direct visualization of IONM waves is a way to alleviate this problem and make IONM more effective.

Methods

Microscope-integrated IONM (MI-IONM) was used in 163 cranial and spinal cases. We evaluated the feasibility, system stability and how well the system integrated into the surgical workflow. We used an IONM system that was connected to a surgical microscope. All IONM modalities used at our institution could be visualized as required, superimposed on the surgical field in the eyepiece of the microscope without obstructing the surgeon’s field of vision.

Results

Use of MI-IONM was safe and reliable. It furthermore provided valuable intraoperative information. The system merely required a short learning curve. Only minor system problems without impact on surgical workflow occurred. MI-IONM proved to be especially useful in surgical cases where careful monitoring of nerve function is required, e.g., cerebellopontine angle surgery. Here, direct assessment of surgical action and IONM wave change was provided to the surgeon, if necessary (on-off control).

Conclusion

MI-IONM is a useful extension of conventional IONM that provides optional real-time functional information to the surgeon on demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Acioly MA, Liebsch M, de Aguiar PH, Tatagiba M (2013) Facial nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle and skull base tumor surgery: a systematic review from description to current success on function prediction. World Neurosurg 80:e271–e300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine 35:S37–S46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo L, Gelb AW (2011) The use of motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery to predict pure motor deficits due to subcortical ischemia. Clin Neurophysiol 122:648–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagpal K, Vats A, Ahmed K, Vincent C, Moorthy K (2010) An evaluation of information transfer through the continuum of surgical care: a feasibility study. Ann Surg 252:402–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, Ritchie R, Jones R, Bush M, Shinn JB (2013) Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 216:933–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kircher ML, Kartush JM (2012) Pitfalls in intraoperative nerve monitoring during vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurg Focus 33:E5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nuwer MR, Cohen BH, Shepard KM (2013) Practice patterns for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. Neurology 80:1156–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prell J, Rachinger J, Scheller C, Alfieri A, Strauss C, Rampp S (2010) A real-time monitoring system for the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 66:1064–1073, discussion 1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

R.M. and A.S. are employees of Inomed Medizintechnik GmbH, Emmendingen, Germany, F.R. of Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oberkochen, Germany.

All other authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Schichor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stoecklein, V.M., Faber, F., Koch, M. et al. Optional real-time display of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in the microscopic field of view: avoiding communication failures in the operating room. Acta Neurochir 157, 1843–1847 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2518-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2518-1

Keywords

Navigation