Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 157, Issue 6, pp 1069–1076 | Cite as

Intradural communication between dorsal rootlets of spinal nerves: their clinical significance

  • Bilgehan Solmaz
  • Necati Tatarlı
  • Davut Ceylan
  • Evren Keleş
  • Safiye Çavdar
Clinical Article - Neurosurgical Anatomy

Abstract

Background

Anatomical and surgical textbooks give almost no attention to the intradural communications between dorsal rootlets of adjacent spinal nerves. These communications can be of significance in various neurosurgical procedures and clinical conditions of the region.

Methods

The spinal cord of six formaldehyde-fixed cadavers was dissected from C1–S5. The dorsal rootlets of the spinal nerves were exposed via a posterior approach and communications between adjacent spinal nerves were documented.

Results

The frequency of communication between adjacent dorsal rootlets of the spinal nerves showed variations among spinal levels. Thirty-eight dorsal rootlet communications were observed in six cadavers (12 sides) and 20 (52.6 %) were at cervical levels, 14 (36.8 %) at thoracic levels, and four (10.5 %) at lumbar levels. The majority of communications were observed on the left side (65.8 %). Communications were most frequently observed at cervical (C4–C5, C5–C6) and upper thoracic (T1–T2) levels and seen least frequently at lower thoracic and lumbar levels. No communications were observed at sacral levels. Five types of communication were observed: I. oblique ascending, II. oblique descending III. short Y, IV. long Y and V shaped. None of the communication extended beyond one segment at any spinal level. The occurrence of such dorsal rootlet communications ranged from 3 to 7 for each cadaver and the mean was 4.8 ± 1.3. Histological sections from various levels of the dorsal rootlet communications showed that all consisted of myelinated fibers of varying diameters.

Conclusions

Such communications may lead to misinterpretation of the pathology on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms and also should be considered in rhizotomy.

Keywords

Communication Dorsal rootlet Variations Clinical significance 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria, educational grants, participation in speakers’ bureaus, membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest, and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyer P, Buchheit F, Thiebaut JB, Arrouf L, Rihaoui SA (1981) Anatomy of intradural anastomoses between cervical nerve roots. Neurochirurgie 27(3):191–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedman AH, Nashold BS Jr, Bronec PR (1988) Dorsal root entry zone lesions for the treatment of brachial plexus avulsion injuries: a follow-up study. Neurosurgery 22(2):369–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hagenah R, Kosak M, Freckmann N (1983) Anatomic topographical relationship of the intraspinal accessory root to the upper cervical roots and to the vessels of the cranial cervical region. Acta Anat (Basel) 115(2):158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haldeman S, Shouka M, Robboy S (1988) Computed tomography, electrodiagnostic and clinical findings in chronic workers’ compensation patients with back and leg pain. Spine 13:345–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamilton WJ, Mossman HW (1972) Human embryology, 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, p 445Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hollinshead WH (1982) Anatomy for surgeons. Vol 3. The back and limb, 3rd edn. Harper & Row, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jasper HH, Ballem G (1949) Unipolar electromyograms of normal and denervated human muscle. J Neurophysiol 12:231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khatri BO, Baruah J, McQuillen MP (1984) Correlation of electro-myography with computed tomography in evaluation of lower back pain. Arch Neurol 41:594–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koch D, Wakhloo AK (1992) CT-guided chemical rhizotomy of the C1 root for occipital neuralgia. Neuroradiology 34(5):451–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lang J (1992) Suboccipital approach (and other approaches) to aneurysms at the craniocervical junction. F.K. Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lang J (1993) Clinical anatomy of the cervical spine. Thieme, New York, pp 106–109Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marzo JM, Simmons EH, Kallen F (1987) Intradural connections between adjacent cervical spinal roots. Spine 12(10):964–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nardin RA, Patel MR, Gudas TF, Rutkove SB, Raynor EM (1999) Electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 22(2):151–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oh CS, Chung IH, Koh KS, Kim HJ, Kim SS (2001) Intradural anastomoses between the accessory nerve and the posterior roots of cervical nerves: their clinical significance. Clin Anat 14(6):424–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oh CS, Chung IH, Koh KS, Kim HJ, Nam KI (2002) Morphologic study of the connections between the accessory nerve and the posterior root of the first cervical nerve. Clin Anat 15(4):267–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Orhan M, Yurttaş Saylam C, Aktan Ikiz ZA, Uçerler H, Zileli M (2009) Connections between the accessory nerve and the posterior root of the first cervical nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 31(2):107–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ouaknine G, Nathan H (1973) Anastomotic connections between the eleventh nerve and the posterior root of the first cervical nerve in humans. J Neurosurg 38(2):189–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pallie W (1959) The intersegmental anastomoses of posterior spinal rootlets and their significance. J Neurosurg 16:188–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pallie W, Manuel JK (1968) Intersegmental anastomoses between dorsal spinal rootlets in some vertebrates. Acta Anat 70:341–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perneczky A, Sunder-Plassmann M (1980) Intradural variant of cervical nerve root fibres potential cause of misinterpreting the segmental location of cervical disc prolapses from clinical evidence. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 52:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sadler TW (2012) Langman’s medical embryology, 12th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 359–362Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saylam CY, Orhan M, Aktan Ikiz ZA, Uçerler H, Zileli M (2009) Connection types between the spinal root of the accessory nerve and the posterior roots of the C2–C6 spinal nerves. Surg Radiol Anat 31(6):419–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schwartz HG (1956) Anastomoses between cervical nerve roots. J Neurosurg 13:190–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seker A, Ceylan D, Tatarlı N, Abdullaev T, Gülbar S, Konya D, Bayri Y, Keleş E, Kılıç T, Cavdar S (2013) A unique case of intradural communicating branches between the accessory nerve and the dorsal roots of the cervical spinal nerves. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 74(6):415–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shea PA, Woods WW, Werden DH (1950) Electromyography in diagnosis of nerve root compression syndrome. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 64(1):93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, An HS, Ikuta Y, Yasuda M (2000) The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25(3):286–291Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trojaborg W (1994) Clinical, electrophysiological, and myelographic studies of 9 patients with cervical spinal root avulsions: discrepancies between EMG and X-ray findings. Muscle Nerve 17(8):913–922CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Slappey JB, Shoja MM, Oakes WJ, Salter EG (2007) Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus: a review and anatomical study. Clin Anat 20(6):624–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Ardalan MR, Apaydin N, Myers C, Shokouhi G, Oakes WJ (2008) Contributions of the fourth spinal nerve to the brachial plexus without prefixation. J Neurosurg Spine 8(6):548–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tubbs RS, El-Zammar D, Loukas M, Cömert A, Cohen-Gadol AA (2009) Intradural cervical root adjacent interconnections in the normal, prefixed, and postfixed brachial plexus. J Neurosurg Spine 11(4):413–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH (1989) Gray’s anatomy, 37th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, p 1123Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu Z, Tsai C, Yang D, Chu F, Chang T (1987) Electrophysiologic study and computed tomography in diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Chin Med J 39:119–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bilgehan Solmaz
    • 1
  • Necati Tatarlı
    • 2
  • Davut Ceylan
    • 3
  • Evren Keleş
    • 4
  • Safiye Çavdar
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryIstanbul Education and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryDr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Education and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgerySakarya University School of MedicineSakaryaTurkey
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryKoç University School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
  5. 5.Department of AnatomyKoç University School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations