Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during resection of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors: experience with 100 cases

  • Clinical Article - Spine
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intradural-extramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery is common. Unlike intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, where intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been described extensively, the application of IONM has not been described in this context, and its relevance has not been investigated.

Methods

From 2001 to 2012, 100 patients underwent intradural-extramedullary spinal cord tumor resection with IONM. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations were completed retrospectively, using a modified McCormick grading scale and correlated with IONM monitorability and dynamics. IONM consisted of transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEP), spinal (D wave) and muscle generators, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), and electromyography (EMG). Both short-term and long-term clinical evaluations were performed. Patient demographics, tumor type, span, location, and morphologic complexity were analyzed.

Results

Surgeries were performed for resection of schwannomas (33 %), meningiomas (22 %), ependymomas (12 %), and other pathologies (20 %); pathology was unknown in 13 % of patients. Tumor locations were cervical in 21 %, thoracic in 46 %, thoracolumbar in 7 %, lumbar 20 %, and not specified in 6 %. Tumors spanned an average of 2.2 spinal levels. Monitorability was 97 and 67 % with tcMEP and SSEP modalities respectively. D waves were monitorable in 73 % of attempts. Intraoperative tcMEP changes were reported in 29 cases with 14 resolved intraoperatively, There were one false-negative outcome and five true-positive outcomes. For SSEP, 13 changes were noted and three resolved; there were three false-negative results and one true-positive result. For D wave monitoring there were two intraoperative changes with none resolved leading to one false negative and one true positive result. With a multimodality approach incorporating any change in evoked potential, IONM demonstrated sensitivity of 0.82, specificity of 0.95, positive predictive value of 0.82, and a negative predictive value of 0.95.

Conclusions

IONM is feasible and useful in the context of intradural-extramedullary spinal cord surgery for identifying iatrogenic injury to the spinal cord.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Accadbled F, Henry P, de Gauzy JS, Cahuzac JP (2006) Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery using an epidural electrode. Results of a prospective, consecutive series of 191 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2614–2623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Constantini S, Miller DC, Allen JC, Rorke LB, Freed D, Epstein FJ (2000) Radical excision of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: surgical morbidity and long-term follow-up evaluation in 164 children and young adults. J Neurosurg 93:183–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong CC, MacDonald DB, Janusz MT (2002) Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1873–S1876, discussion S1892-1878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobs MJ, Mess WH (2003) The role of evoked potential monitoring in operative management of type I and type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15:353–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs MJ, Meylaerts SA, de Haan P, de Mol BA, Kalkman CJ (1999) Strategies to prevent neurologic deficit based on motor-evoked potentials in type I and II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 29:48–57, discussion 57-49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luk KD, Hu Y, Wong YW, Cheung KM (2001) Evaluation of various evoked potential techniques for spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1772–1777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. MacDonald DB, Janusz M (2002) An approach to intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring of thoracoabdominal aneurysm surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:43–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meylaerts SA, Jacobs MJ, van Iterson V, De Haan P, Kalkman CJ (1999) Comparison of transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Surg 230:742–7499

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morota N, Deletis V, Constantini S, Kofler M, Cohen H, Epstein FJ (1997) The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 41:1327–1336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sala F, Palandri G, Basso E, Lanteri P, Deletis V, Faccioli F, Bricolo A (2006) Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. Neurosurgery 58:1129–1143, discussion 1129–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sala F, Bricolo A, Faccioli F, Lanteri P, Gerosa M (2007) Surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the role of intraoperative (neurophysiological) monitoring. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 2):S130–S139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutter M, Deletis V, Dvorak J, Eggspuehler A, Grob D, Macdonald D, Mueller A, Sala F, Tamaki T (2007) Current opinions and recommendations on multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 2):S232–S237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutter M, Eggspuehler A, Muller A, Dvorak J (2007) Multimodal intraoperative monitoring: an overview and proposal of methodology based on 1,017 cases. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 2):S153–S161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Szelenyi A, Kothbauer K, de Camargo AB, Langer D, Flamm ES, Deletis V (2005) Motor evoked potential monitoring during cerebral aneurysm surgery: technical aspects and comparison of transcranial and direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 57:331–338, discussion 331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamaki T, Kubota S (2007) History of the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 2):S140–S146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weigang E, Hartert M, von Samson P, Sircar R, Pitzer K, Genstorfer J, Zentner J, Beyersdorf F (2005) Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: interplay of spinal cord protecting modalities. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30:624–6311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, Sandalcioglu IE, Schafer H, Stolke D (2002) The impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring on surgical decisions: a critical analysis of 423 cases. J Neurosurg 96:255–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    A. Korn, Z. Lidar, T. Biron & S. Constantini

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

    D. Halevi

  3. Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Tel Aviv Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    P. Ekstein

  4. Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children’s Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, 6, Weizman Street, Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel

    A. Korn, T. Biron & S. Constantini

Authors
  1. A. Korn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Halevi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Z. Lidar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Biron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Ekstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Constantini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Constantini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korn, A., Halevi, D., Lidar, Z. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during resection of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors: experience with 100 cases. Acta Neurochir 157, 819–830 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2307-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2307-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation