Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of body mass index on the outcome of brachial plexus surgery: are there any differences between elbow and shoulder results?

  • Clinical Article - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Body mass index (BMI) has recently been identified as a predictor of outcomes following reconstructive surgery of shoulder palsies. In this study, we sought to determine if the same holds true for the reconstruction of elbow flexion.

Methods

Forty patients who had undergone partial ulnar-to-biceps nerve transfer (Oberlin’s procedure) for shoulder palsy were assessed and compared against18 previously reported patients who had undergone reconstruction for elbow palsies. The British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale and an index dividing shoulder abduction strength in the affected arm by healthy arm were recorded. All patients had undergone surgery within 12 months of injury and had ≥12 months of follow-up.

Results

M4 or M3 biceps strength was obtained in 90 % of patients. Final strength on the affected side averaged 5.8 kg, versus 20.2 kg on the normal side, for a mean recovery index score of 0.30. In this sample of 40 patients, BMI did not predict percentage strength or BMRC grade recovery. Neither did age, number of roots involved, the affected side, nor time to surgery. Comparing patients with elbow versus shoulder reconstruction, there were no differences, except that patients undergoing Oberlin’s procedure had a statistically longer duration of time between injury and surgical repair (7.4 vs 5.1 months, p < 0.006).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that proximal muscle re-innervation is functionally more dependent upon BMI than distal re-innervation, likely because proximal muscles must support the weight of the entire extremity, while more distal muscles do not. BMI should be taken into consideration when planning surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aparecida Leandro-Merhi V, Luiz Braga de Aquino J, Gonzaga Teixeira de Camargo J (2012) Agreement between body mass index, calf circumference, arm circumference, habitual energy intake and the MNA in hospitalized elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 16:128–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooley SM, Donnelly JC, Walsh T, Durnea U, Collins C, Rodeck CH, Hindmarsh PC, Geary MP (2011) The relationship between body mass index and mid-arm circumference in a pregnant population. J Obstet Gynaecol 31:594–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elhassan B, Bishop AT, Hartzler RU, Shin AY, Spinner RJ (2012) Tendon transfer options about the shoulder in patients with brachial plexus injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1391–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Faglioni W Jr, Siqueira MG, Martins RS, Heise CO, Foroni L (2014) The epidemiology of adult traumatic brachial plexus lesions in a large metropolis. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 156:1025–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jivan S, Kumar N, Wiberg M, Kay S (2009) The influence of pre- surgical delay on functional outcome after reconstruction of brachial plexus injuries. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:472–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khadivzadeh T (2002) Mid upper arm and calf circumferences as indicators of nutritional status in women of reproductive age. East Mediterr Health J 8:612–618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JY, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, Shin AY (2012) Factors affecting outcome of triceps motor branch transfer for isolated axillary nerve injury. J Hand Surg [Am] 37:2350–2356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luedemann W, Hamm M, Blömer U, Samii M, Tatagiba M (2002) Brachial plexus neurotization with donor phrenic nerves and its effect on pulmonary function. J Neurosurg 96:523–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malessy MJ, van Duinen SG, Feirabend HK, Thomeer RT (1999) Correlation between histopathological findings in C-5 and C-6 nerve stumps and motor recovery following nerve grafting for repair of brachial plexus injury. J Neurosurg 91:636–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Heise CO, Foroni L, Teixeira MJ (2013) A prospective study comparing single and double fascicular transfer to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury. Neurosurgery 72:709–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merrell GA, Barrie KA, Katz DL, Wolfe SW (2001) Results of nerve transfer techniques for restoration of shoulder and elbow function in the context of a meta-analysis of the English literature. J Hand Surg [Am] 26:303–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Midha R (2004) Nerve transfers for severe brachial plexus injuries: a review. Neurosurg Focus 15:E5

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oberlin C, Beal D, Leechavengvongs S, Salon A, Dauge MC, Sarcy JJ (1994) Nerve transfer to biceps muscle using a part of ulnar nerve for C5-C6 avulsion of the brachial plexus: anatomical study and report of four cases. J Hand Surg [Am] 19:232–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Park JH, Restrepo C, Norton R, Mandel S, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J (2013) Common peroneal nerve palsy following total knee arthroplasty: prognostic factors and course of recovery. J Arthroplasty 28:1538–1542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, Battaglia D (2011) Use of long autologous nerve grafts in brachial plexus reconstruction: factors that affect the outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wein) 153:2231–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, Bonilla G, Malessy M (2014) Spinal to accessory nerve transfer in traumatic brachial plexus palsy: is body mass index a predictor of outcome? Acta Neurochir (Wein) 156:159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Socolovsky M, Paez MD (2013) A literature review of intercostal-to-musculocutaneous-nerve transfers in brachial plexus injury patients: Does body mass index influence results in Eastern versus Western countries? Surg Neurol Int 4:152

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Socolovsky M, Martins RS, Di Masi G, Siqueira M (2012) Upper brachial plexus injuries: grafts vs ulnar fascicle transfer to restore biceps muscle function. Neurosurgery 71(2 Suppl Operative):ons227–ons232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariano Socolovsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Socolovsky, M., Martins, R.S., Di Masi, G. et al. Influence of body mass index on the outcome of brachial plexus surgery: are there any differences between elbow and shoulder results?. Acta Neurochir 156, 2337–2344 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2256-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2256-9

Keywords

Navigation