Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biocompatible heterogeneous porous gel matrix NeuroGelTM promotes regeneration of rat sciatic nerve within tubular silicone prosthesis (experimental study)

  • Experimental Research - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of NeuroGel™ to promote and enhance the regeneration of rat sciatic nerve within a 10-mm gap using silicone tubular prosthesis, and to evaluate and compare the regeneration outcomes versus autologous grafting.

Methods

The 10-mm gap of rat sciatic nerve was bridged through silicone tubular prosthesis filled with dehydrated NeuroGel™, and NeuroGel™ saturated with rat NGF-B (NG30-NGG60, NGgfB30-NGgfB60). To assess the regeneration of the peripheral nerve we utilized three general and most commonly applied methods: electrophysiologic, hystomorphometric, and functional methods.

Results

The average M-wave amplitude (AMW index), or the intermediary index of the number of regenerated axons, in animal groups NGG60 and NGgfB60 60 days post-op was: 2.44 ± 0.57 mV and 1.87 ± 0.48 mV. These indices were statistically lower compared to the indices obtained after autologous grafting. The average impulse conduction velocity along motor fibers (VMF index), or the intermediary index of myelination rate, was: 13.3 mm/ms and 13.3 mm/ms, respectively, statistically equal to indices obtained after autologous grafting. The average density (D) of regenerated fibers (direct numerical indicator in contrast to intermediary AMW index) in animal groups NGG60 and NGgfB60 was: 4,920 ± 178.88 and 5,340 ± 150.33 per mm2, respectively. These indices were statistically higher versus indices obtained after autologous grafting. Myelination rates of regenerated fibers in animal groups NGG60 and NGgfB60 were 73 and 86 %, respectively. They were also statistically higher. The average sciatic functional index (SFI) in NGG60 and NGgfB60 was: −25.57 ± 3.05 and −24.124 ± 4.8, respectively, which is statistically equal to indices obtained after autologous grafting.

Conclusions

Neurogel™ strongly promotes the regeneration of rat sciatic nerve within silicone tubular prosthesis. After bridging a 10-mm gap through silicone prosthesis with Neurogel™ or Neurogel™ +NGF-B-modified intraluminal space, the myelination rate of regenerated axons of rat sciatic nerve appeared to be higher, and the axon count and functional recovery is similar to results seen with the autografting technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA (1989) Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:129–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlton JM, Goldberg NH (1987) Quantitating integrated muscle function following reinnervation. Surg Forum 37:611–614

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE (1989) Selection of the appropriate parameter to measure neural regeneration. Ann Plast Surg 23:197–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grigorovich KA (1981) Surgical treatment of nerve injuries Medicine, Leningrad (in Russian)

  5. Ijpma FFA, Van De Graaf RC, Meek MFJ (2008) The early history of tubulation in nerve repair. J Hand Surg (Eur Vol) 33:581–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston RB, Zachary L, Dellon AL, Seiler WA, Teplica DM (1991) Improved imaging of rat hindfoot prints for walking track analysis. J Neurosci Methods 38:111–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mackinnon SE, Hudson AR, Hunter DA (1985) Histologic assessment of nerve regeneration in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:384–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Munro CA, Szalai JP, Mackinnon SE, Midha R (1998) Lack of association between outcome measures of nerve regeneration. Muscle Nerve 21:1095–1097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Olivera ARL, Pierucci A, de Brito PK (2004) Peripheral nerve regeneration through the nerve tubulization technique. Braz J Morphol Sci 21:225–231

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sarikcioglu L, Demirel BM, Utuk A (2009) Walking track analysis: an assessment method for functional recovery after sciatic nerve injury in the rat. Folia Morphol 68:1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsymbaliyk VI, Gay’ko GV, Suliy MM, Strafun SS (2001) Surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries. Ukrmedkniga, Ternopil

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tsymbaliyk VI, Stashkevych AT (1987) Surgical treatment of injuries of peripheral nerves. Vrach Delo 6:47

    Google Scholar 

  13. Woerly S, Doan VD, Sosa N, de Vellis J, Espinosa-Jeffrey A (2004) Prevention of gliotic scar formation by NeuroGel™ allows partial endogenous repair of transected cat spinal cord. J Neurosci Res 75:262–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Woerly S, Petrov P, Sykovа E, Roitbak T, Simonov Z, Harvey AR (1999) Neural tissue formation within porous hydrogels implanted in brain and spinal cord lesions: ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and diffusion studies. Tissue Eng 5:467–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woerly S, Pinet E, de Robertis L, Van Diep D, Bousmina M (2001) Spinal cord repair with PHPMA hydrogel containing RGD peptides (NeuroGel™). Biomaterials 22:1095–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Restorative Neurosurgery Department, The State Institution Institute of Neurosurgery named after A.P.Romodanov of the National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine, 04050, 32 Platon Mayboroda St., Kiev, Ukraine

    Alexander A. Gatskiy, Ihor B. Tretyak & Vitaliy Tsymbaliuk

Authors
  1. Alexander A. Gatskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ihor B. Tretyak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vitaliy Tsymbaliuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander A. Gatskiy.

Additional information

Clinical Trial Registration number: 0112U006514

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gatskiy, A.A., Tretyak, I.B. & Tsymbaliuk, V. Biocompatible heterogeneous porous gel matrix NeuroGelTM promotes regeneration of rat sciatic nerve within tubular silicone prosthesis (experimental study). Acta Neurochir 156, 1591–1598 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2116-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2116-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation